
Clemson Tigers
2026: 0-1 · Elo 1646 · #35 of 240 · 10.0 for, 51.0 against · ATS 0-1
Rating trajectory The model's Elo after each week, this season in blue and last season in grey. 1500 is league average; every 22 (NFL) or 18 (college) points is about one point of spread.
Model on this team
- Winner calls
- 1/1
- Against the spread
- 0-1
- Avg CLV
- 0.00 pts
- SP+ (2026)
- +13.1
- SP+ (2025)
- +9.5
- Talent composite
- 863
- Returning production
- 41%
How they play
- Pass rate
- 56%
- Standard-down share
- 71%
- Plays / game
- 64
- Possession / game
- 31:02
Offense · best and worst (of 135)
- Standard-down PPA
- #31 · +0.18
- Completion %
- #36 · 65%
- Interception rate
- #44 · 1.9%
- Stuff rate
- #48 · 18%
- Third-down conversion
- #114 · 34%
- Passing-down PPA
- #101 · +0.21
- Yards / rush
- #97 · 3.9
- Pass explosiveness
- #97 · 1.50
Defense · best and worst (of 135)
- Points / scoring opportunity
- #9 · 2.68
- Havoc rate
- #9 · 19.6%
- Third-down conversion
- #13 · 32%
- Pass success rate
- #15 · 36%
- Power success
- #127 · 83%
- Interceptions forced
- #122 · 1.4%
- Pass explosiveness
- #118 · 1.70
- Takeaways / game
- #61 · 1.31
2026 schedule
| Date | Opponent | Result | Line | Model | ATS | CLV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5W1 | at | L 10–51 | +10 | LSU 58%✓ | loss | 0.0 |
| Sep 12W2 | vs | — | -26.5 | CLEM 80% | — | — |
| Sep 19W3 | vs | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sep 25W4 | atCalifornia Golden Bears | — | — | — | — | — |
| Oct 3W5 | vs | — | +7 | — | — | — |
| Oct 17W7 | vs | — | — | — | — | — |
| Oct 24W8 | vs | — | — | — | — | — |
| Oct 31W9 | at | — | -1.5 | — | — | — |
| Nov 7W10 | at | — | — | — | — | — |
| Nov 14W11 | vs | — | — | — | — | — |
| Nov 20W12 | at | — | — | — | — | — |
| Nov 28W13 | vs | — | -3 | — | — | — |
Line is this team's spread. Model, ATS and CLV are shown only for picks locked before kickoff; 1 played.