← College Football slate
Clemson Tigers
0-1 · #35 Elo
at
Sat, Oct 31, 12:00 AM ET
Doak Campbell Stadium
Florida State Seminoles
1-0 · #50 Elo
Spread CLEM -1.5Total 51.5Moneyline CLEM -112 · FSU -108
The read
On rating alone Clemson Tigers are 3.2 points better (#35 vs #50 of 240), and FSU add 0.0 for home field.
Who has the edge
Rating
Clear edge
CLEM
CLEM rated 3.2 points better on Elo (#50 vs #35).
Home & rest
Even
—
FSU gets 0.0 points for home field.
Passing game
Even
—
CLEM passing ranks #58, FSU defends it at #70; the other way FSU #46 into CLEM's #48.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Even
—
FSU rushing ranks #12, CLEM defends it at #29; the other way CLEM #75 into FSU's #73.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Even
—
FSU third-down conversion ranks #8, CLEM defends it at #13; the other way CLEM #114 into FSU's #59.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
FSU
FSU +17.0 per game over the last five, CLEM −41.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
Slight edge
CLEM
Consensus has CLEM by 1.5.
context · not in the margin
The margin, factor by factor
Clemson TigersFlorida State Seminoles
1646 Elo · #35
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
CLEM +3.2 pts
1590 Elo · #50
road
Home field
not priced
home
—
Rest
even
—
−1.7 pts vs FSU D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
CLEM +6.7 pts
−8.4 pts vs CLEM D
L · −41.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
FSU +29.0 pts
W · +17.0
+9.5
SP+ (last season)Bill Connelly's SP+ from last season, the prior the college model starts each season from.
CLEM +2.3 pts
+7.2
CLEM -1.5
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
CLEM +1.5 pts
FSU +1.5
Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).
Dissect the matchup
CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)Biggest mismatches
- ▸FSU pass explosiveness (#5) against a CLEM defense ranked #118 at stopping it
- ▸FSU power success (#48) against a CLEM defense ranked #127 at stopping it
- ▸FSU defense (#18 rush explosiveness allowed) against a CLEM offense ranked #90
- ▸CLEM stuff rate (#48) against a FSU defense ranked #119 at stopping it
- ▸FSU defense (#28 yards / rush allowed) against a CLEM offense ranked #97
A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.
Clemson Tigers offense vs Florida State Seminoles defense
ranks of 135| CLEM off | FSU def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate faced | 56% | 44% | · |
| Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains). | 71% | 70% | · |
| Plays / game | 64 | 59 | · |
| Possession / game | 31:02 | 31:14 | · |
| Passing | |||
| Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD). | +0.28#58 | +0.25#70 | · |
| Pass success rate | 43%#56 | 43%#79 | · |
| Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are. | 1.50#97 | 1.54#57 | FSU |
| Yards / pass attempt | 7.3#62 | 7.0#60 | · |
| Completion % | 65%#36 | 62%#75 | CLEM |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 1.9%#44 | 2.8%#49 | · |
| Rushing | |||
| Rushing PPA / play | +0.10#75 | +0.11#73 | · |
| Rush success rate | 43%#80 | 42%#66 | · |
| Rush explosiveness | 0.91#90 | 0.86#18 | FSU |
| Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed. | 2.99#59 | 3.12#105 | CLEM |
| Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line. | 18%#48 | 15%#119 | CLEM |
| Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2. | 72%#71 | 76%#104 | CLEM |
| Yards / rush | 3.9#97 | 3.6#28 | FSU |
| Situational | |||
| Standard-down PPA | +0.18#31 | +0.09#66 | CLEM |
| Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+). | +0.21#101 | +0.34#92 | · |
| Third-down conversion | 34%#114 | 38%#59 | FSU |
| Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 3.80#59 | 4.12#110 | CLEM |
| Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play. | 15.1%#59 | 15.5%#72 | · |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 1.15#50 | 1.17#79 | CLEM |
Florida State Seminoles offense vs Clemson Tigers defense
ranks of 135| FSU off | CLEM def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate faced | 44% | 57% | · |
| Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains). | 69% | 63% | · |
| Plays / game | 62 | 63 | · |
| Possession / game | 28:46 | 29:07 | · |
| Passing | |||
| Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD). | +0.32#46 | +0.19#48 | · |
| Pass success rate | 41%#79 | 36%#15 | CLEM |
| Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are. | 1.85#5 | 1.70#118 | FSU |
| Yards / pass attempt | 9.0#11 | 6.8#50 | FSU |
| Completion % | 59%#99 | 61%#54 | CLEM |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 3.5%#105 | 1.4%#122 | · |
| Rushing | |||
| Rushing PPA / play | +0.25#12 | +0.03#29 | · |
| Rush success rate | 50%#10 | 39%#41 | FSU |
| Rush explosiveness | 1.03#45 | 0.94#59 | · |
| Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed. | 3.40#7 | 2.68#27 | · |
| Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line. | 13%#5 | 23%#17 | · |
| Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2. | 75%#48 | 83%#127 | FSU |
| Yards / rush | 5.2#20 | 3.6#24 | · |
| Situational | |||
| Standard-down PPA | +0.17#39 | +0.03#33 | · |
| Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+). | +0.50#11 | +0.23#48 | FSU |
| Third-down conversion | 51%#8 | 32%#13 | · |
| Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 3.95#45 | 2.68#9 | CLEM |
| Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play. | 14.5%#54 | 19.6%#9 | CLEM |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 1.58#105 | 1.31#61 | CLEM |
Season
| CLEM | FSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Record | 1-0 |
| 10.0 | Points for / game | 34.0 |
| 51.0 | Points against / game | 17.0 |
| 0-0 / 0-1 | Home / road | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| 0-1 | Against the spread | 0-1 |
| 1-0 | Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean. | 0-1 |
| L | Last 5 | W |
Power ratings
| CLEM | FSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 1646 | Elo | 1590 |
| #35 of 240 | Rank | #50 of 240 |
| +4.3 | Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted. | +2.2 |
| +10.6 | Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good. | +6.0 |
| — | Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season. | 1270 |
Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.
Advanced
| CLEM | FSU | |
|---|---|---|
| +13.1 | SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average. | +9.1 |
| 0.190 | Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD). | 0.271 |
| 0.107 | Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better. | 0.162 |
| 42% / 37% | Success rate (off / def) | 46% / 42% |
| 1.24 / 1.36 | Explosiveness (off / def) | 1.35 / 1.16 |
| 863 | Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster. | 800 |
| 41% | Returning production | 40% |
Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Head to head
| 2025 | FSU 10 at CLEM 24 | CLEM · CLEM covered |
| 2024 | CLEM 29 at FSU 13 | CLEM · FSU covered |
| 2023 | FSU 31 at CLEM 24 | FSU · FSU covered |
How the margin was built
- Rating gap
- CLEM +3.2 pts
- Home field
- FSU +— pts
- Rest
- Even
- Weather / roof
- — pts on the total
- Model margin
- —
- Model total
- —
Market
- Spread
- CLEM -1.5
- Total
- 51.5
- Moneyline
- CLEM -112 · FSU -108
Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).
Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.