Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Arkansas Razorbacks
1-0 · #78 Elo
at
Sat, Oct 17, 12:00 AM ET
FirstBank Stadium
Vanderbilt Commodores
1-0 · #11 Elo
Spread Total Moneyline

The read

On rating alone Vanderbilt Commodores are 16.7 points better (#11 vs #78 of 240), and VAN add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the rushing game: VAN rushing ranks #1, ARK defends it at #124; the other way ARK #4 into VAN's #32.

Who has the edge

Rating
Clear edge
VAN
VAN rated 16.7 points better on Elo (#11 vs #78).
Home & rest
Even
VAN gets 0.0 points for home field.
Passing game
Slight edge
VAN
VAN passing ranks #1, ARK defends it at #131; the other way ARK #31 into VAN's #114.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Clear edge
VAN
VAN rushing ranks #1, ARK defends it at #124; the other way ARK #4 into VAN's #32.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Slight edge
VAN
VAN third-down conversion ranks #6, ARK defends it at #118; the other way ARK #16 into VAN's #111.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Even
VAN +19.0 per game over the last five, ARK +17.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Arkansas RazorbacksVanderbilt Commodores
1507 Elo · #78
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
VAN +16.7 pts
1807 Elo · #11
road
Home field
not priced
home
Rest
even
−2.6 pts vs VAN D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
VAN +11.9 pts
+9.3 pts vs ARK D
W · +17.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
VAN +1.0 pts
W · +19.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • VAN passing ppa / play (#1) against a ARK defense ranked #131 at stopping it
  • VAN passing-down ppa (#1) against a ARK defense ranked #128 at stopping it
  • VAN rushing ppa / play (#1) against a ARK defense ranked #124 at stopping it
  • VAN rush success rate (#8) against a ARK defense ranked #131 at stopping it
  • VAN yards / pass attempt (#4) against a ARK defense ranked #125 at stopping it

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

Arkansas Razorbacks offense vs Vanderbilt Commodores defense

ranks of 135
ARK offVAN defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced51%54%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).69%66%·
Plays / game6056·
Possession / game29:0128:42·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.37#31+0.35#114ARK
Pass success rate45%#3843%#91ARK
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.70#221.56#75ARK
Yards / pass attempt8.3#237.1#66ARK
Completion %61%#8667%#123ARK
Interception rate / Interceptions forced1.6%#241.7%#105ARK
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.30#4+0.04#32ARK
Rush success rate54%#140%#47ARK
Rush explosiveness1.08#250.93#53ARK
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.43#62.66#24·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.20%#9222%#31VAN
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.65%#10572%#74VAN
Yards / rush5.7#53.7#30·
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.19#28+0.11#78ARK
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.58#5+0.38#108ARK
Third-down conversion47%#1643%#111ARK
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.4.20#313.90#90ARK
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.16.9%#10117.1%#39VAN
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.67#1141.15#89·

Vanderbilt Commodores offense vs Arkansas Razorbacks defense

ranks of 135
VAN offARK defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced52%44%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).74%69%·
Plays / game5762·
Possession / game31:1830:59·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.55#1+0.44#131VAN
Pass success rate54%#346%#117VAN
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.54#741.71#121VAN
Yards / pass attempt9.3#48.5#125VAN
Completion %70%#763%#79VAN
Interception rate / Interceptions forced2.0%#483.2%#31·
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.35#1+0.21#124VAN
Rush success rate50%#850%#131VAN
Rush explosiveness1.21#20.95#60VAN
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.37#93.05#99VAN
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.16%#2519%#63VAN
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.76%#3871%#67VAN
Yards / rush5.7#74.8#107VAN
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.32#2+0.20#122VAN
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.78#1+0.44#128VAN
Third-down conversion51%#644%#118VAN
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.5.00#34.21#119VAN
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.12.9%#2815.4%#73VAN
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game0.92#190.75#122VAN

Season

ARKVAN
1-0Record1-0
31.0Points for / game28.0
14.0Points against / game9.0
1-0 / 0-0Home / road1-0 / 0-0
0-1Against the spread0-1
0-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.0-1
WLast 5W

Power ratings

ARKVAN
1507Elo1807
#78 of 240Rank#11 of 240
+6.1Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.+11.3
+2.1Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+8.8
1436Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1477

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

ARKVAN
SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.+9.8
0.311Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).0.440
0.274Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.203
49% / 47%Success rate (off / def)52% / 42%
1.36 / 1.27Explosiveness (off / def)1.39 / 1.31
Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.727
Returning production35%

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
VAN +16.7 pts
Home field
VAN +— pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
— pts on the total
Model margin
Model total

Market

Spread
Total
Moneyline

Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.