← NFL slate
Tennessee Titans
3-14 last yr · #31 Elo
at
Sun, Oct 18, 1:00 PM ET
Lucas Oil Stadium
Indianapolis Colts
8-9 last yr · #22 Elo
Spread IND -3.5Total 47.5Moneyline TEN +160 · IND -192
The read
On rating alone Indianapolis Colts are 5.0 points better (#22 vs #31 of 32), and IND add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the rushing game: IND rushing ranks #2, TEN defends it at #22; the other way TEN #26 into IND's #8.
Who has the edge
Rating
Clear edge
IND
IND rated 5.0 points better on Elo (#22 vs #31).
Home & rest
Even
—
IND gets 0.0 points for home field.
Quarterback
not priced
—
Usual starters on both sides — Daniel Jones and Cam Ward — no adjustment.
Passing game
Clear edge
IND
IND passing ranks #11, TEN defends it at #29; the other way TEN #31 into IND's #18.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Clear edge
IND
IND rushing ranks #2, TEN defends it at #22; the other way TEN #26 into IND's #8.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Clear edge
IND
IND third-down conversion ranks #7, TEN defends it at #19; the other way TEN #32 into IND's #25.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Slight edge
TEN
IND −10.8 per game over the last five, TEN −7.2.
context · not in the margin
Market
Clear edge
IND
Consensus has IND by 3.5.
context · not in the margin
The margin, factor by factor
Tennessee TitansIndianapolis Colts
1353 Elo · #31
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
IND +5.0 pts
1464 Elo · #22
road
Home field
not priced
home
—
Rest
even
—
Ward · −6.6 EPA/g
QuarterbackStarter's value against what the team usually gets at quarterback. Only moves when someone other than the usual starter plays.
even
Jones · +6.9 EPA/g
+0.8 pts vs IND D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
IND +5.5 pts
+6.3 pts vs TEN D
L L W L W · −7.2
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
TEN +1.8 pts
L L L L L · −10.8
7 out/IR
InjuriesCount of players listed Out or on IR. Not priced beyond the quarterback.
not priced
5 out/IR
TEN +3.5
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
IND +3.5 pts
IND -3.5
Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).
Dissect the matchup
nflverse play-by-play + FTN charting · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)Biggest mismatches
- ▸IND red-zone touchdown rate (#6) against a TEN defense ranked #29 at stopping it
- ▸IND yards / dropback (#9) against a TEN defense ranked #30 at stopping it
- ▸IND epa / rush (#2) against a TEN defense ranked #22 at stopping it
- ▸IND defense (#8 epa / rush allowed) against a TEN offense ranked #26
- ▸IND epa / dropback (#11) against a TEN defense ranked #29 at stopping it
A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.
Tennessee Titans offense vs Indianapolis Colts defense
ranks of 32| TEN off | IND def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate facedDropbacks as a share of plays. On the defense column: what opponents do against them. | 65% | 63% | · |
| Early-down pass rateFirst and second down only — the cleanest read on run-heavy vs pass-heavy. | 59% | 60% | · |
| Neutral-script pass rateEarly downs with win probability between 20% and 80%: intent, not catch-up mode. | 52% | 57% | · |
| Pass rate over expectedHow much more (or less) a team passes than the down, distance, score and clock predict. nflverse xpass. | −3.9% | +0.0% | · |
| Seconds per playTime of possession divided by plays — lower is faster. | 29.8 | 28.8 | · |
| No-huddle | 10% | 9% | · |
| Shotgun | 73% | 68% | · |
| Play-action rate / Play-action facedShare of dropbacks with a play fake (FTN charting). | 19% | 22% | · |
| RPO rate / RPOs faced | 11% | 6% | · |
| Screen rate / Screens faced | 11% | 6% | · |
| Pre-snap motion / Motion faced | 45% | 52% | · |
| Blitzes faced / Blitz rateFive or more pass rushers (FTN). On the offense column: how often opponents blitz them. | 26% | 28% | · |
| Pass rushers faced / Avg pass rushers | 4.33 | 4.32 | · |
| Passing | |||
| EPA / dropbackThe single best pass-efficiency number; on the defense column, what they allow. | −0.20#31 | +0.06#18▲ | IND |
| Pass success rate | 37%#31 | 47%#21 | IND |
| Explosive pass rateDropbacks gaining 20+ yards. | 6.5%#28▲ | 8.2%#18▲ | IND |
| Yards / dropback | 4.6#31 | 6.4#20 | IND |
| Depth of target (aDOT)Average air yards per attempt — how far downfield they throw, or get thrown at. | 7.1 | 7.9 | · |
| Deep-ball rate (20+ air) | 10% | 12% | · |
| Short throws (≤5 air) | 54% | 50% | · |
| Completion % over expectednflverse CPOE, per attempt. Defense column: what they allow. | −3.5#29▲ | −0.4#12▲ | IND |
| YAC / completion | 4.8#24 | 4.9#13 | IND |
| Sack rate / Sack rate generatedSacks per dropback. Lower is better for an offense; the defense column shows sacks they create. | 8.7%#26▼ | 5.6%#24▼ | · |
| Scramble rate | 3.6% | 4.3% | · |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 1.4%#5 | 2.3%#16 | TEN |
| Throws left / middle / rightDirection shares are shown in full on the row. | L 38 · M 19 · R 43 | L 34 · M 21 · R 45 | · |
| Rushing | |||
| EPA / rush | −0.09#26 | −0.09#8▲ | IND |
| Rush success rate | 38%#27 | 42%#19 | IND |
| Explosive rush rateRushes of 10+ yards. | 9.7%#16 | 9.1%#12 | · |
| Yards / rush | 4.1#19 | 3.8#5 | IND |
| Runs left / middle / right | L 34 · M 29 · R 37 | L 34 · M 30 · R 36 | · |
| Situational | |||
| Third-down conversion | 32%#32 | 43%#25 | IND |
| Red-zone touchdown rateDrives reaching the 20 that end in a touchdown. | 58%#14 | 54%#10 | · |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 1.12#15▼ | 1.24#10 | · |
| Plays / game | 59 | 65 | · |
Indianapolis Colts offense vs Tennessee Titans defense
ranks of 32| IND off | TEN def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate facedDropbacks as a share of plays. On the defense column: what opponents do against them. | 60% | 60% | · |
| Early-down pass rateFirst and second down only — the cleanest read on run-heavy vs pass-heavy. | 56% | 56% | · |
| Neutral-script pass rateEarly downs with win probability between 20% and 80%: intent, not catch-up mode. | 56% | 60% | · |
| Pass rate over expectedHow much more (or less) a team passes than the down, distance, score and clock predict. nflverse xpass. | −0.9% | +3.1% | · |
| Seconds per playTime of possession divided by plays — lower is faster. | 30.1 | 31.5 | · |
| No-huddle | 5% | 6% | · |
| Shotgun | 72% | 60% | · |
| Play-action rate / Play-action facedShare of dropbacks with a play fake (FTN charting). | 28% | 30% | · |
| RPO rate / RPOs faced | 9% | 4% | · |
| Screen rate / Screens faced | 5% | 8% | · |
| Pre-snap motion / Motion faced | 53% | 55% | · |
| Blitzes faced / Blitz rateFive or more pass rushers (FTN). On the offense column: how often opponents blitz them. | 30% | 23% | · |
| Pass rushers faced / Avg pass rushers | 4.35 | 4.26 | · |
| Passing | |||
| EPA / dropbackThe single best pass-efficiency number; on the defense column, what they allow. | +0.08#11▼ | +0.19#29▼ | IND |
| Pass success rate | 47%#10 | 49%#26 | IND |
| Explosive pass rateDropbacks gaining 20+ yards. | 7.3%#21▼ | 10.1%#30 | IND |
| Yards / dropback | 6.8#9 | 7.1#30 | IND |
| Depth of target (aDOT)Average air yards per attempt — how far downfield they throw, or get thrown at. | 8.0 | 7.8 | · |
| Deep-ball rate (20+ air) | 10% | 13% | · |
| Short throws (≤5 air) | 54% | 53% | · |
| Completion % over expectednflverse CPOE, per attempt. Defense column: what they allow. | +0.6#17▼ | +6.1#30▲ | IND |
| YAC / completion | 5.0#17 | 5.6#26 | IND |
| Sack rate / Sack rate generatedSacks per dropback. Lower is better for an offense; the defense column shows sacks they create. | 4.8%#7 | 7.0%#10 | · |
| Scramble rate | 4.2% | 6.7% | · |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 2.6%#22▲ | 1.2%#29▼ | IND |
| Throws left / middle / rightDirection shares are shown in full on the row. | L 41 · M 20 · R 38 | L 37 · M 21 · R 41 | · |
| Rushing | |||
| EPA / rush | +0.06#2▼ | −0.02#22▼ | IND |
| Rush success rate | 45%#5 | 40%#9 | · |
| Explosive rush rateRushes of 10+ yards. | 10.1%#13▼ | 9.4%#17 | · |
| Yards / rush | 4.6#8▼ | 4.2#18 | IND |
| Runs left / middle / right | L 26 · M 43 · R 32 | L 35 · M 33 · R 31 | · |
| Situational | |||
| Third-down conversion | 43%#7 | 41%#19 | IND |
| Red-zone touchdown rateDrives reaching the 20 that end in a touchdown. | 65%#6 | 66%#29▲ | IND |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 1.24#21▲ | 0.71#29▼ | IND |
| Plays / game | 59 | 58 | · |
Route-by-route data (which routes are run and how coverage plays them) is not published anywhere public — it is sold by PFF and NGS. Throw depth, direction, play-action, RPO, screens, motion and pass-rush counts above are the public pieces of the same picture.
Tennessee Titans · key players
- Cam Ward QB19.0/31.8 · 186 yds/g · 15-7 TD-INT · −0.18 EPA/db
- Elic Ayomanor WR5.6 tgt/g · 18% share · 32 yds/g · 4 TD · aDOT 12.7
- Chig Okonkwo TE4.6 tgt/g · 15% share · 33 yds/g · 2 TD · aDOT 4.6
- Chimere Dike WR4.4 tgt/g · 14% share · 25 yds/g · 4 TD · aDOT 8.1
- Gunnar Helm TE3.4 tgt/g · 11% share · 22 yds/g · 2 TD · aDOT 5.5
- Tony Pollard RB14.2 car/g · 64 yds/g · 4.5 ypc · 5 TD · −0.09 EPA/car
- Tyjae Spears RB5.5 car/g · 22 yds/g · 3.9 ypc · 2 TD · −0.05 EPA/car
2025 season, per game. Targets ranked by volume, rushers by carries.nflverse weekly player stats. Target share is the player's average share of his team's targets in the games he played. A player who changed teams carries his own games from last season.
Indianapolis Colts · key players
- Daniel Jones QB20.1/29.5 · 239 yds/g · 19-8 TD-INT · +0.16 EPA/db
- Tyler Warren TEQuestionable6.6 tgt/g · 21% share · 48 yds/g · 4 TD · aDOT 5.4
- Michael Pittman WR6.5 tgt/g · 21% share · 46 yds/g · 7 TD · aDOT 8.2
- Josh Downs WRQuestionable5.5 tgt/g · 17% share · 35 yds/g · 4 TD · aDOT 7.5
- Alec Pierce WR5.6 tgt/g · 18% share · 67 yds/g · 6 TD · aDOT 19.0
- Jonathan Taylor RB19.0 car/g · 93 yds/g · 4.9 ypc · 18 TD · +0.06 EPA/car
- DJ Giddens RB5.2 car/g · 19 yds/g · 3.7 ypc · 0 TD · +0.00 EPA/car
2025 season, per game. Targets ranked by volume, rushers by carries.nflverse weekly player stats. Target share is the player's average share of his team's targets in the games he played. A player who changed teams carries his own games from last season.
Season
| TEN | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 3-14 | Record | 8-9 |
| 16.7 | Points for / game | 27.4 |
| 28.1 | Points against / game | 24.2 |
| 1-8 / 2-6 | Home / road | 6-3 / 2-6 |
| 7-10 | Against the spread | 9-8 |
| 11-6 | Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean. | 9-8 |
| L L W L W | Last 5 | L L L L L |
Season numbers are from 2025 until this season has games.
Power ratings
| TEN | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| 1353 | Elo | 1464 |
| #31 of 32 | Rank | #22 of 32 |
| −1.8 | Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted. | +2.5 |
| −3.8 | Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good. | −2.6 |
| — | Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season. | — |
Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.
Efficiency
| TEN | IND | |
|---|---|---|
| -0.158 | EPA / play (offense)Expected points added per offensive play, nflverse. The single best efficiency number. | 0.080 |
| 0.094 | EPA / play allowed | 0.007 |
| 191 | Pass yards / game | 240 |
| 93 | Rush yards / game | 118 |
| 248 | Pass yards allowed | 262 |
| 115 | Rush yards allowed | 102 |
| 0.6 / 0.8 | Turnovers / takeaways | 0.9 / 1.4 |
| 3.3 / 2.5 | Sacks allowed / made | 1.7 / 2.3 |
| 14.2 | First downs / game | 18.9 |
| 59 | Penalty yards / game | 51 |
| −6.6 · #46 of 52 | QB EPA / gameThe listed starter's passing + rushing EPA per game, ranked among starters with three or more games. | +6.9 · #6 of 52 |
Efficiency is from the 2025 season until this one has games. Source: nflverse.
Head to head
| 2025 | TEN 14 at IND 38 | IND · IND covered |
| 2025 | IND 41 at TEN 20 | IND · IND covered |
| 2024 | TEN 30 at IND 38 | IND · IND covered |
| 2024 | IND 20 at TEN 17 | IND · IND covered |
| 2023 | IND 31 at TEN 28 | IND · IND covered |
| 2023 | TEN 16 at IND 23 | IND · IND covered |
| 2022 | IND 10 at TEN 19 | TEN · TEN covered |
| 2022 | TEN 24 at IND 17 | TEN · TEN covered |
How the margin was built
- Rating gap
- IND +5.0 pts
- Home field
- IND +— pts
- Rest
- Even
- Quarterback
- Usual starters — no adjustment
- Weather / roof
- — pts on the total
- Model margin
- —
- Model total
- —
Market
- Spread
- IND -3.5
- Total
- 47.5
- Moneyline
- TEN +160 · IND -192
Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).
Tennessee Titans injuries
- Dorian Mausi LBInjured Reserve
- Jaren Kanak TEInjured Reserve
- Jaylen Harrell LBInjured Reserve
- Joshua Williams CBInjured Reserve
- Kendell Brooks SInjured Reserve
- Milo Eifler LBInjured Reserve
- Tanoh Kpassagnon DEInjured Reserve
- Andre James CQuestionable
- Carnell Tate WRQuestionable
- Keldric Faulk DEQuestionable
- Mitchell Trubisky QBQuestionable
- Wan'Dale Robinson WRQuestionable
From ESPN's report. The model prices the quarterback; other absences are context it does not yet price.
Indianapolis Colts injuries
- Cameron Mitchell CBInjured Reserve
- Carson Towt TEInjured Reserve
- Coleman Owen WRInjured Reserve
- D.J. Montgomery WRInjured Reserve
- Will Mallory TEInjured Reserve
- A.J. Haulcy SQuestionable
- Charvarius Ward CBQuestionable
- Josh Downs WRQuestionable
- Sean McKeon TEQuestionable
- Tyler Warren TEQuestionable
From ESPN's report. The model prices the quarterback; other absences are context it does not yet price.
Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.