Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Auburn Tigers
1-0 · #59 Elo
at
Sat, Nov 14, 12:00 AM ET
Davis Wade Stadium
Spread Total Moneyline

The read

On rating alone Auburn Tigers are 0.8 points better (#59 vs #63 of 240), and MSST add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the rushing game: AUB rushing ranks #13, MSST defends it at #96; the other way MSST #71 into AUB's #2.

Who has the edge

Rating
Even
AUB rated 0.8 points better on Elo (#63 vs #59).
Home & rest
Even
MSST gets 0.0 points for home field.
Passing game
Even
MSST passing ranks #92, AUB defends it at #80; the other way AUB #119 into MSST's #91.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Clear edge
AUB
AUB rushing ranks #13, MSST defends it at #96; the other way MSST #71 into AUB's #2.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Even
AUB third-down conversion ranks #76, MSST defends it at #96; the other way MSST #38 into AUB's #34.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
MSST
MSST +49.0 per game over the last five, AUB +1.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Auburn TigersMississippi State Bulldogs
1566 Elo · #59
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
AUB +0.8 pts
1552 Elo · #63
road
Home field
not priced
home
Rest
even
+1.6 pts vs MSST D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
AUB +2.3 pts
−0.7 pts vs AUB D
W · +1.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
MSST +24.0 pts
W · +49.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • AUB line yards / rush (#23) against a MSST defense ranked #134 at stopping it
  • AUB stuff rate (#20) against a MSST defense ranked #125 at stopping it
  • AUB defense (#6 yards / rush allowed) against a MSST offense ranked #107
  • AUB rush success rate (#30) against a MSST defense ranked #123 at stopping it
  • AUB defense (#10 standard-down ppa allowed) against a MSST offense ranked #103

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

Auburn Tigers offense vs Mississippi State Bulldogs defense

ranks of 135
AUB offMSST defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced48%46%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).69%70%·
Plays / game6665·
Possession / game29:2630:56·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.13#119+0.30#91MSST
Pass success rate40%#8840%#56MSST
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.30#1331.73#123·
Yards / pass attempt6.5#1027.3#81·
Completion %61%#8160%#49MSST
Interception rate / Interceptions forced3.0%#842.3%#78·
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.24#13+0.16#96AUB
Rush success rate47%#3048%#123AUB
Rush explosiveness1.00#540.89#30·
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.19#233.41#134AUB
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.15%#2014%#125AUB
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.80%#1877%#107AUB
Yards / rush4.7#434.9#118AUB
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.15#47+0.15#101AUB
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.21#104+0.38#109·
Third-down conversion39%#7641%#96·
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.3.90#503.68#69·
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.16.8%#10013.5%#110·
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game0.67#41.38#53AUB

Mississippi State Bulldogs offense vs Auburn Tigers defense

ranks of 135
MSST offAUB defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced46%51%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).66%68%·
Plays / game6764·
Possession / game28:4130:34·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.21#92+0.27#80·
Pass success rate39%#10144%#99·
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.71#181.57#80MSST
Yards / pass attempt8.0#337.2#73MSST
Completion %62%#6562%#77·
Interception rate / Interceptions forced3.3%#971.0%#132MSST
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.11#71−0.11#2AUB
Rush success rate44%#6233%#5AUB
Rush explosiveness0.96#680.89#28AUB
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.2.81#942.25#4AUB
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.19%#8326%#5AUB
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.72%#7270%#58·
Yards / rush3.7#1072.9#6AUB
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.05#103−0.04#10AUB
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.30#70+0.30#70·
Third-down conversion43%#3835%#34·
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.4.41#223.37#42·
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.18.2%#11716.6%#51AUB
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.15#521.42#48·

Season

AUBMSST
1-0Record1-0
17.0Points for / game62.0
16.0Points against / game13.0
1-0 / 0-0Home / road1-0 / 0-0
0-1Against the spread1-0
0-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.1-0
WLast 5W

Power ratings

AUBMSST
1566Elo1552
#59 of 240Rank#63 of 240
+2.5Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.+10.1
+10.7Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+0.8
1520Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1196

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

AUBMSST
SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.+4.8
0.170Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).0.138
0.069Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.221
43% / 38%Success rate (off / def)42% / 44%
1.14 / 1.29Explosiveness (off / def)1.29 / 1.27
Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.805
Returning production34%

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

2023MSST 13 at AUB 27AUB · AUB covered

How the margin was built

Rating gap
AUB +0.8 pts
Home field
MSST +— pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
— pts on the total
Model margin
Model total

Market

Spread
Total
Moneyline

Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.