Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Ball State Cardinals
0-1 · #237 Elo
at
Wed, Nov 4, 12:00 AM ET
Warren McGuirk Alumni Stadium
Spread Total Moneyline

The read

On rating alone Ball State Cardinals are 3.7 points better (#237 vs #239 of 240), and MASS add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the third down & red zone: BALL third-down conversion ranks #119, MASS defends it at #131; the other way MASS #131 into BALL's #100.

Who has the edge

Rating
Clear edge
BALL
BALL rated 3.7 points better on Elo (#239 vs #237).
Home & rest
Even
MASS gets 0.0 points for home field.
Passing game
Slight edge
BALL
BALL passing ranks #135, MASS defends it at #127; the other way MASS #131 into BALL's #93.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Slight edge
BALL
BALL rushing ranks #110, MASS defends it at #120; the other way MASS #128 into BALL's #97.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Slight edge
BALL
BALL third-down conversion ranks #119, MASS defends it at #131; the other way MASS #131 into BALL's #100.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
MASS
MASS +16.0 per game over the last five, BALL −53.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Ball State CardinalsMassachusetts Minutemen
1180 Elo · #237
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
BALL +3.7 pts
1114 Elo · #239
road
Home field
not priced
home
Rest
even
+1.1 pts vs MASS D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
BALL +2.3 pts
−1.1 pts vs BALL D
L · −53.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
MASS +34.5 pts
W · +16.0
−23.0
SP+ (last season)Bill Connelly's SP+ from last season, the prior the college model starts each season from.
BALL +13.6 pts
−36.6
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • BALL defense (#17 power success allowed) against a MASS offense ranked #126
  • BALL defense (#41 stuff rate forced) against a MASS offense ranked #135
  • MASS rush explosiveness (#12) against a BALL defense ranked #99 at stopping it
  • BALL defense (#59 points / scoring opportunity allowed) against a MASS offense ranked #135
  • MASS interception rate (#7) against a BALL defense ranked #80 at stopping it

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

Ball State Cardinals offense vs Massachusetts Minutemen defense

ranks of 135
BALL offMASS defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced42%43%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).64%74%·
Plays / game5658·
Possession / game29:4433:04·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).−0.03#135+0.41#127·
Pass success rate31%#13248%#128·
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.55#641.62#102BALL
Yards / pass attempt6.0#1278.6#130·
Completion %56%#12268%#128·
Interception rate / Interceptions forced3.2%#933.0%#40MASS
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.03#110+0.20#120·
Rush success rate34%#13249%#128·
Rush explosiveness1.09#230.84#13·
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.2.52#1293.53#135·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.23%#12211%#135·
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.58%#13277%#105MASS
Yards / rush3.5#1225.1#123·
Situational
Standard-down PPA−0.04#129+0.24#129·
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.06#129+0.42#120·
Third-down conversion34%#11947%#131·
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.2.71#1314.64#133·
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.21.0%#1348.5%#135·
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.33#800.75#124BALL

Massachusetts Minutemen offense vs Ball State Cardinals defense

ranks of 135
MASS offBALL defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced54%46%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).62%70%·
Plays / game5460·
Possession / game26:5630:16·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.02#131+0.30#93BALL
Pass success rate34%#12844%#97BALL
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.30#1341.56#71BALL
Yards / pass attempt4.8#1357.7#108BALL
Completion %54%#13262%#69BALL
Interception rate / Interceptions forced1.0%#72.3%#80MASS
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play−0.03#128+0.16#97BALL
Rush success rate33%#13547%#111·
Rush explosiveness1.12#121.03#99MASS
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.2.05#1352.97#82BALL
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.28%#13521%#41BALL
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.60%#12663%#17BALL
Yards / rush2.8#1304.8#111·
Situational
Standard-down PPA−0.10#135+0.11#80BALL
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.14#125+0.33#89BALL
Third-down conversion31%#13142%#100BALL
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.2.17#1353.57#59BALL
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.19.9%#13014.0%#104·
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.33#811.08#92·

Season

BALLMASS
0-1Record1-0
3.0Points for / game37.0
56.0Points against / game21.0
0-0 / 0-1Home / road0-0 / 1-0
0-1Against the spread1-0
1-0Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.1-0
LLast 5W

Power ratings

BALLMASS
1180Elo1114
#237 of 240Rank#239 of 240
−6.6Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−6.9
−5.7Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.−7.7
1937Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1526

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

BALLMASS
−25.1SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.−32.9
-0.004Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).-0.011
0.179Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.284
33% / 44%Success rate (off / def)34% / 48%
1.31 / 1.26Explosiveness (off / def)1.23 / 1.18
564Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.526
6%Returning production-57%

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
BALL +3.7 pts
Home field
MASS +— pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
— pts on the total
Model margin
Model total

Market

Spread
Total
Moneyline

Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.