Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
at
Sat, Sep 12, 11:59 PM ET
Clarence T.C. Ching Athletics Complex · 87° · Mostly sunny
Spread HAW -11.5Total 51.5Moneyline NMSU +310 · HAW -395
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Strong
HAW -395
82%
model margin HAW by 15.8
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.Lean +
HAW -11.5
51%
4.3 pts from the number
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.Lean +
Over 51.5
51%
model total 55.1

The read

On rating alone Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors are 12.7 points better (#84 vs #231 of 240), and HAW add 3.1 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the passing game: HAW passing ranks #47, NMSU defends it at #76; the other way NMSU #111 into HAW's #75. The model lands on HAW by 15.8 against a market HAW by 11.5, so the spread lean is HAW by 4.3 points — a lean, not an edge: against closing lines this model covers about 49%. On the total the model sees 55.1 against 51.5.

Who has the edge

Model: HAW by 15.8 · market HAW by 11.5
Rating
Clear edge
HAW
HAW rated 12.7 points better on Elo (#84 vs #231).
Home & rest
Clear edge
HAW
HAW gets 3.1 points for home field.
Passing game
Clear edge
HAW
HAW passing ranks #47, NMSU defends it at #76; the other way NMSU #111 into HAW's #75.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Slight edge
NMSU
NMSU rushing ranks #134, HAW defends it at #66; the other way HAW #116 into NMSU's #15.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Slight edge
HAW
HAW third-down conversion ranks #29, NMSU defends it at #95; the other way NMSU #45 into HAW's #45.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
NMSU
HAW −10.0 per game over the last five, NMSU +10.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
Clear edge
HAW
Consensus has HAW by 11.5; the model says HAW by 15.8.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: HAW by 15.8 · market HAW by 11.5
New Mexico State AggiesHawai'i Rainbow Warriors
1261 Elo · #231
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
HAW +12.7 pts
1490 Elo · #84
road
Home field
HAW +3.1 pts
home
14d
Rest
even
14d
−6.6 pts vs HAW D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
HAW +11.2 pts
+4.6 pts vs NMSU D
W L · +10.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
NMSU +10.0 pts
L · −10.0
−15.5
SP+ (last season)Bill Connelly's SP+ from last season, the prior the college model starts each season from.
HAW +17.2 pts
+1.7
NMSU +11.5
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
HAW +11.5 pts
HAW -11.5

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • NMSU defense (#15 rushing ppa / play allowed) against a HAW offense ranked #116
  • HAW defense (#36 standard-down ppa allowed) against a NMSU offense ranked #128
  • HAW defense (#39 points / scoring opportunity allowed) against a NMSU offense ranked #113
  • HAW defense (#61 havoc rate) against a NMSU offense ranked #132
  • HAW defense (#36 completion % allowed) against a NMSU offense ranked #104

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

New Mexico State Aggies offense vs Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors defense

ranks of 135
NMSU offHAW defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced59%52%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).64%66%·
Plays / game6859·
Possession / game30:0628:02·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.17#111+0.26#75HAW
Pass success rate40%#9041%#60HAW
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.44#1091.57#78HAW
Yards / pass attempt6.4#1147.5#91·
Completion %58%#10459%#36HAW
Interception rate / Interceptions forced3.2%#873.0%#39HAW
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play−0.09#134+0.10#66HAW
Rush success rate33%#13443%#74HAW
Rush explosiveness0.91#880.97#76·
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.2.13#1333.21#119·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.26%#13316%#115·
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.69%#8981%#122NMSU
Yards / rush2.6#1354.2#67HAW
Situational
Standard-down PPA−0.04#128+0.04#36HAW
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.20#107+0.43#124·
Third-down conversion42%#4536%#45·
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.3.21#1133.35#39HAW
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.20.3%#13216.0%#61HAW
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game2.00#1311.15#91HAW

Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors offense vs New Mexico State Aggies defense

ranks of 135
HAW offNMSU defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced62%48%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).66%69%·
Plays / game6772·
Possession / game31:5729:52·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.31#47+0.26#76HAW
Pass success rate44%#4944%#108HAW
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.56#611.49#43·
Yards / pass attempt7.0#797.0#58·
Completion %65%#4064%#95HAW
Interception rate / Interceptions forced1.5%#233.9%#10·
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.02#116+0.00#15NMSU
Rush success rate38%#11641%#52NMSU
Rush explosiveness0.91#910.92#44NMSU
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.2.80#952.99#90·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.20%#9720%#58NMSU
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.59%#13071%#69NMSU
Yards / rush3.7#1084.4#84·
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.09#84+0.05#41NMSU
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.37#41+0.23#45·
Third-down conversion45%#2941%#95HAW
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.3.77#603.29#34·
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.12.2%#1515.6%#70HAW
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.31#771.92#11NMSU

Season

NMSUHAW
1-1Record0-1
34.0Points for / game27.0
24.0Points against / game37.0
1-0 / 0-1Home / road0-0 / 0-1
2-0Against the spread0-1
1-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.1-0
W LLast 5L

Power ratings

NMSUHAW
1261Elo1490
#231 of 240Rank#84 of 240
−4.9Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.+2.5
−2.2Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+1.7
1580Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1470

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

NMSUHAW
−18.5SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.−2.6
0.049Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).0.184
0.105Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.174
37% / 42%Success rate (off / def)41% / 42%
1.26 / 1.21Explosiveness (off / def)1.34 / 1.29
460Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.557
24%Returning production65%

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

2023NMSU 17 at HAW 20HAW · push

How the margin was built

Rating gap
HAW +12.7 pts
Home field
HAW +3.1 pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
0.0 pts on the total
Model margin
HAW by 15.8
Model total
55.1 vs 51.5

Market · 1 books

Spread
HAW -11.5
Total
51.5
Moneyline
NMSU +310 · HAW -395
Best price
NMSU +310 draftkings · HAW -395 draftkings
BookHAW spreadTotalNMSU MLHAW ML
draftkings+310-395
Spreadopened HAW -11.5 · now HAW -11.5
Totalopened 51.5 · now 51.5

Consensus of the books we track, hourly, since we first priced the game. The arrow on the spread is from the home side: ▲ means the home side is laying more.

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.