Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
at
Sat, Nov 14, 3:30 PM ET
Houchens Industries-L.T. Smith Stadium
Western Kentucky Hilltoppers
9-4 last yr · #72 Elo
Spread Total Moneyline

The read

On rating alone Western Kentucky Hilltoppers are 4.2 points better (#72 vs #121 of 240), and WKU add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the third down & red zone: WKU third-down conversion ranks #25, JVST defends it at #46; the other way JVST #82 into WKU's #35.

Who has the edge

Rating
Clear edge
WKU
WKU rated 4.2 points better on Elo (#72 vs #121).
Home & rest
Even
WKU gets 0.0 points for home field.
Passing game
Clear edge
WKU
WKU passing ranks #74, JVST defends it at #67; the other way JVST #101 into WKU's #29.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Slight edge
JVST
JVST rushing ranks #28, WKU defends it at #61; the other way WKU #85 into JVST's #76.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Clear edge
WKU
WKU third-down conversion ranks #25, JVST defends it at #46; the other way JVST #82 into WKU's #35.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Even
WKU +8.0 per game over the last five, JVST +8.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Jacksonville State GamecocksWestern Kentucky Hilltoppers
1443 Elo · #121
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
WKU +4.2 pts
1519 Elo · #72
road
Home field
not priced
home
Rest
even
−4.1 pts vs WKU D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
WKU +0.5 pts
−3.6 pts vs JVST D
W L · +8.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
even
W L L W W · +8.0
−6.7
SP+ (last season)Bill Connelly's SP+ from last season, the prior the college model starts each season from.
WKU +8.3 pts
+1.6
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • JVST rush explosiveness (#13) against a WKU defense ranked #129 at stopping it
  • WKU power success (#12) against a JVST defense ranked #117 at stopping it
  • JVST yards / rush (#15) against a WKU defense ranked #116 at stopping it
  • WKU defense (#2 power success allowed) against a JVST offense ranked #95
  • JVST defense (#23 takeaways / game) against a WKU offense ranked #113

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

Jacksonville State Gamecocks offense vs Western Kentucky Hilltoppers defense

ranks of 135
JVST offWKU defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced35%52%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).71%66%·
Plays / game6768·
Possession / game30:2730:25·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.19#101+0.16#29WKU
Pass success rate39%#9836%#17WKU
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.53#791.54#60·
Yards / pass attempt6.9#846.3#23WKU
Completion %59%#9355%#10WKU
Interception rate / Interceptions forced4.3%#1252.8%#48WKU
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.20#28+0.09#61JVST
Rush success rate47%#3739%#28·
Rush explosiveness1.11#131.13#129JVST
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.15#322.79#52·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.18%#6022%#30WKU
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.68%#9555%#2WKU
Yards / rush5.4#154.9#116JVST
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.13#55+0.05#39·
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.31#64+0.23#42·
Third-down conversion39%#8235%#35WKU
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.3.73#642.72#10WKU
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.14.0%#4816.1%#59·
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game0.93#231.08#96JVST

Western Kentucky Hilltoppers offense vs Jacksonville State Gamecocks defense

ranks of 135
WKU offJVST defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced57%47%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).67%67%·
Plays / game6565·
Possession / game29:3629:33·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.24#74+0.24#67·
Pass success rate42%#6342%#69·
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.51#891.56#72·
Yards / pass attempt7.1#697.4#83·
Completion %66%#3261%#61WKU
Interception rate / Interceptions forced1.8%#381.3%#126WKU
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.08#85+0.11#76·
Rush success rate45%#5042%#68·
Rush explosiveness0.91#931.06#114·
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.2.99#612.71#33JVST
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.20%#9620%#44JVST
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.81%#1279%#117WKU
Yards / rush4.2#834.0#53JVST
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.06#95+0.08#61JVST
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.36#45+0.32#80WKU
Third-down conversion46%#2536%#46·
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.4.21#303.78#80WKU
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.15.1%#6017.0%#40·
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.62#1131.71#23JVST

Season

JVSTWKU
1-1Record9-4
28.0Points for / game29.5
20.0Points against / game22.8
1-0 / 0-1Home / road5-1 / 4-3
1-1Against the spread10-3
1-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.6-7
W LLast 5W L L W W

Season numbers are from 2025 until this season has games.

Power ratings

JVSTWKU
1443Elo1519
#121 of 240Rank#72 of 240
−1.3Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−0.1
+3.4Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+2.8
1435Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

JVSTWKU
−7.8SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.−7.3
0.185Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).0.162
0.158Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.108
44% / 42%Success rate (off / def)43% / 37%
1.25 / 1.31Explosiveness (off / def)1.24 / 1.34
603Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.612
50%Returning production84%

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

2025WKU 34 at JVST 37JVST · JVST covered
2024WKU 12 at JVST 52JVST · JVST covered
2024JVST 17 at WKU 19WKU · WKU covered
2023WKU 17 at JVST 20JVST · JVST covered

How the margin was built

Rating gap
WKU +4.2 pts
Home field
WKU +— pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
— pts on the total
Model margin
Model total

Market

Spread
Total
Moneyline

Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.