Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
at
Sat, Nov 14, 12:00 AM ET
Donald W. Reynolds Razorback Stadium
Arkansas Razorbacks
1-0 · #78 Elo
Spread Total Moneyline

The read

On rating alone South Carolina Gamecocks are 4.9 points better (#47 vs #78 of 240), and ARK add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the rushing game: SC rushing ranks #81, ARK defends it at #124; the other way ARK #4 into SC's #8.

Who has the edge

Rating
Clear edge
SC
SC rated 4.9 points better on Elo (#78 vs #47).
Home & rest
Even
ARK gets 0.0 points for home field.
Passing game
Even
ARK passing ranks #31, SC defends it at #73; the other way SC #108 into ARK's #131.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Slight edge
SC
SC rushing ranks #81, ARK defends it at #124; the other way ARK #4 into SC's #8.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Slight edge
ARK
ARK third-down conversion ranks #16, SC defends it at #71; the other way SC #127 into ARK's #118.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
SC
ARK +17.0 per game over the last five, SC +57.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

South Carolina GamecocksArkansas Razorbacks
1595 Elo · #47
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
SC +4.9 pts
1507 Elo · #78
road
Home field
not priced
home
Rest
even
+4.8 pts vs ARK D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
SC +11.1 pts
−6.3 pts vs SC D
W · +57.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
SC +20.0 pts
W · +17.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • SC defense (#15 takeaways / game) against a ARK offense ranked #114
  • SC pass explosiveness (#30) against a ARK defense ranked #121 at stopping it
  • SC yards / pass attempt (#38) against a ARK defense ranked #125 at stopping it
  • ARK defense (#31 interceptions forced) against a SC offense ranked #103
  • ARK pass success rate (#38) against a SC defense ranked #106 at stopping it

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

South Carolina Gamecocks offense vs Arkansas Razorbacks defense

ranks of 135
SC offARK defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced50%44%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).64%69%·
Plays / game5862·
Possession / game27:5930:59·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.17#108+0.44#131·
Pass success rate36%#11946%#117·
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.65#301.71#121SC
Yards / pass attempt7.9#388.5#125SC
Completion %61%#8063%#79·
Interception rate / Interceptions forced3.5%#1033.2%#31ARK
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.09#81+0.21#124SC
Rush success rate39%#10650%#131·
Rush explosiveness1.07#300.95#60SC
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.2.89#763.05#99·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.17%#4319%#63·
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.62%#12371%#67ARK
Yards / rush3.3#1284.8#107·
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.07#92+0.20#122SC
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.14#124+0.44#128·
Third-down conversion32%#12744%#118·
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.2.61#1334.21#119·
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.19.8%#12915.4%#73ARK
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.50#970.75#122·

Arkansas Razorbacks offense vs South Carolina Gamecocks defense

ranks of 135
ARK offSC defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced51%47%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).69%69%·
Plays / game6063·
Possession / game29:0132:01·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.37#31+0.25#73ARK
Pass success rate45%#3844%#106ARK
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.70#221.48#41·
Yards / pass attempt8.3#237.0#57ARK
Completion %61%#8660%#47SC
Interception rate / Interceptions forced1.6%#242.9%#42·
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.30#4−0.06#8·
Rush success rate54%#139%#39ARK
Rush explosiveness1.08#250.88#23·
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.43#62.70#31·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.20%#9222%#26SC
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.65%#10568%#42SC
Yards / rush5.7#53.8#47ARK
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.19#28+0.06#51·
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.58#5+0.14#14·
Third-down conversion47%#1640%#71ARK
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.4.20#313.15#29·
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.16.9%#10116.0%#60SC
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.67#1141.83#15SC

Season

SCARK
1-0Record1-0
57.0Points for / game31.0
0.0Points against / game14.0
1-0 / 0-0Home / road1-0 / 0-0
1-0Against the spread0-1
1-0Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.0-1
WLast 5W

Power ratings

SCARK
1595Elo1507
#47 of 240Rank#78 of 240
+6.9Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.+6.1
+12.5Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+2.1
1230Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1436

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

SCARK
+12.6SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.
0.099Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).0.311
0.085Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.274
37% / 42%Success rate (off / def)49% / 47%
1.35 / 1.19Explosiveness (off / def)1.36 / 1.27
863Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.
69%Returning production

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
SC +4.9 pts
Home field
ARK +— pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
— pts on the total
Model margin
Model total

Market

Spread
Total
Moneyline

Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.