

The read
On rating alone Miami Hurricanes are 14.7 points better (#8 vs #50 of 240), and MIA add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the passing game: MIA passing ranks #13, FSU defends it at #70; the other way FSU #46 into MIA's #21.
Who has the edge
The margin, factor by factor
Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).
Dissect the matchup
CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)Biggest mismatches
- ▸FSU defense (#18 rush explosiveness allowed) against a MIA offense ranked #128
- ▸MIA stuff rate (#16) against a FSU defense ranked #119 at stopping it
- ▸MIA power success (#4) against a FSU defense ranked #104 at stopping it
- ▸MIA points / scoring opportunity (#24) against a FSU defense ranked #110 at stopping it
- ▸MIA completion % (#4) against a FSU defense ranked #75 at stopping it
A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.
Florida State Seminoles offense vs Miami Hurricanes defense
ranks of 135| FSU off | MIA def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate faced | 44% | 55% | · |
| Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains). | 69% | 64% | · |
| Plays / game | 62 | 57 | · |
| Possession / game | 28:46 | 26:56 | · |
| Passing | |||
| Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD). | +0.32#46 | +0.13#21 | · |
| Pass success rate | 41%#79 | 38%#28 | MIA |
| Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are. | 1.85#5 | 1.46#30 | · |
| Yards / pass attempt | 9.0#11 | 6.3#24 | · |
| Completion % | 59%#99 | 60%#40 | MIA |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 3.5%#105 | 2.3%#75 | MIA |
| Rushing | |||
| Rushing PPA / play | +0.25#12 | +0.01#16 | · |
| Rush success rate | 50%#10 | 36%#10 | · |
| Rush explosiveness | 1.03#45 | 1.01#93 | FSU |
| Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed. | 3.40#7 | 2.58#14 | · |
| Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line. | 13%#5 | 20%#49 | FSU |
| Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2. | 75%#48 | 73%#80 | FSU |
| Yards / rush | 5.2#20 | 3.0#9 | · |
| Situational | |||
| Standard-down PPA | +0.17#39 | −0.03#14 | · |
| Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+). | +0.50#11 | +0.21#29 | · |
| Third-down conversion | 51%#8 | 31%#11 | · |
| Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 3.95#45 | 2.51#5 | MIA |
| Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play. | 14.5%#54 | 18.9%#13 | MIA |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 1.58#105 | 1.56#35 | MIA |
Miami Hurricanes offense vs Florida State Seminoles defense
ranks of 135| MIA off | FSU def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate faced | 48% | 44% | · |
| Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains). | 74% | 70% | · |
| Plays / game | 60 | 59 | · |
| Possession / game | 33:04 | 31:14 | · |
| Passing | |||
| Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD). | +0.43#13 | +0.25#70 | MIA |
| Pass success rate | 49%#10 | 43%#79 | MIA |
| Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are. | 1.51#87 | 1.54#57 | FSU |
| Yards / pass attempt | 8.2#29 | 7.0#60 | MIA |
| Completion % | 72%#4 | 62%#75 | MIA |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 3.2%#90 | 2.8%#49 | FSU |
| Rushing | |||
| Rushing PPA / play | +0.09#76 | +0.11#73 | · |
| Rush success rate | 45%#58 | 42%#66 | · |
| Rush explosiveness | 0.80#128 | 0.86#18 | FSU |
| Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed. | 3.13#35 | 3.12#105 | MIA |
| Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line. | 14%#16 | 15%#119 | MIA |
| Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2. | 83%#4 | 76%#104 | MIA |
| Yards / rush | 4.3#76 | 3.6#28 | FSU |
| Situational | |||
| Standard-down PPA | +0.16#42 | +0.09#66 | · |
| Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+). | +0.37#42 | +0.34#92 | MIA |
| Third-down conversion | 47%#19 | 38%#59 | MIA |
| Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 4.36#24 | 4.12#110 | MIA |
| Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play. | 12.1%#14 | 15.5%#72 | MIA |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 0.94#25 | 1.17#79 | MIA |
Season
| FSU | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-0 | Record | 1-0 |
| 34.0 | Points for / game | 45.0 |
| 17.0 | Points against / game | 6.0 |
| 1-0 / 0-0 | Home / road | 0-0 / 1-0 |
| 0-1 | Against the spread | 1-0 |
| 0-1 | Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean. | 1-0 |
| W | Last 5 | W |
Power ratings
| FSU | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| 1590 | Elo | 1855 |
| #50 of 240 | Rank | #8 of 240 |
| +2.2 | Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted. | +10.9 |
| +6.0 | Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good. | +18.3 |
| 1270 | Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season. | 1515 |
Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.
Advanced
| FSU | MIA | |
|---|---|---|
| +9.1 | SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average. | +22.0 |
| 0.271 | Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD). | 0.218 |
| 0.162 | Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better. | 0.052 |
| 46% / 42% | Success rate (off / def) | 46% / 37% |
| 1.35 / 1.16 | Explosiveness (off / def) | 1.16 / 1.27 |
| 800 | Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster. | 886 |
| 40% | Returning production | 37% |
Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Head to head
| 2025 | MIA 28 at FSU 22 | MIA · MIA covered |
| 2024 | FSU 14 at MIA 36 | MIA · FSU covered |
| 2023 | MIA 20 at FSU 27 | FSU · MIA covered |
How the margin was built
- Rating gap
- MIA +14.7 pts
- Home field
- MIA +— pts
- Rest
- Even
- Weather / roof
- — pts on the total
- Model margin
- —
- Model total
- —
Market
- Spread
- MIA -16.5
- Total
- 53.5
- Moneyline
- FSU +750 · MIA -1200
Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).
Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.