Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
at
Sat, Oct 17, 12:00 AM ET
Hard Rock Stadium
Miami Hurricanes
1-0 · #8 Elo
Spread MIA -16.5Total 53.5Moneyline FSU +750 · MIA -1200

The read

On rating alone Miami Hurricanes are 14.7 points better (#8 vs #50 of 240), and MIA add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the passing game: MIA passing ranks #13, FSU defends it at #70; the other way FSU #46 into MIA's #21.

Who has the edge

Rating
Clear edge
MIA
MIA rated 14.7 points better on Elo (#8 vs #50).
Home & rest
Even
MIA gets 0.0 points for home field.
Passing game
Clear edge
MIA
MIA passing ranks #13, FSU defends it at #70; the other way FSU #46 into MIA's #21.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Even
FSU rushing ranks #12, MIA defends it at #16; the other way MIA #76 into FSU's #73.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Clear edge
MIA
MIA third-down conversion ranks #19, FSU defends it at #59; the other way FSU #8 into MIA's #11.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
MIA
MIA +39.0 per game over the last five, FSU +17.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
Clear edge
MIA
Consensus has MIA by 16.5.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Florida State SeminolesMiami Hurricanes
1590 Elo · #50
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
MIA +14.7 pts
1855 Elo · #8
road
Home field
not priced
home
Rest
even
−16.1 pts vs MIA D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
MIA +20.9 pts
+4.9 pts vs FSU D
W · +17.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
MIA +11.0 pts
W · +39.0
+7.2
SP+ (last season)Bill Connelly's SP+ from last season, the prior the college model starts each season from.
MIA +13.5 pts
+20.7
FSU +16.5
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
MIA +16.5 pts
MIA -16.5

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • FSU defense (#18 rush explosiveness allowed) against a MIA offense ranked #128
  • MIA stuff rate (#16) against a FSU defense ranked #119 at stopping it
  • MIA power success (#4) against a FSU defense ranked #104 at stopping it
  • MIA points / scoring opportunity (#24) against a FSU defense ranked #110 at stopping it
  • MIA completion % (#4) against a FSU defense ranked #75 at stopping it

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

Florida State Seminoles offense vs Miami Hurricanes defense

ranks of 135
FSU offMIA defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced44%55%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).69%64%·
Plays / game6257·
Possession / game28:4626:56·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.32#46+0.13#21·
Pass success rate41%#7938%#28MIA
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.85#51.46#30·
Yards / pass attempt9.0#116.3#24·
Completion %59%#9960%#40MIA
Interception rate / Interceptions forced3.5%#1052.3%#75MIA
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.25#12+0.01#16·
Rush success rate50%#1036%#10·
Rush explosiveness1.03#451.01#93FSU
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.40#72.58#14·
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.13%#520%#49FSU
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.75%#4873%#80FSU
Yards / rush5.2#203.0#9·
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.17#39−0.03#14·
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.50#11+0.21#29·
Third-down conversion51%#831%#11·
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.3.95#452.51#5MIA
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.14.5%#5418.9%#13MIA
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.58#1051.56#35MIA

Miami Hurricanes offense vs Florida State Seminoles defense

ranks of 135
MIA offFSU defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced48%44%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).74%70%·
Plays / game6059·
Possession / game33:0431:14·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.43#13+0.25#70MIA
Pass success rate49%#1043%#79MIA
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.51#871.54#57FSU
Yards / pass attempt8.2#297.0#60MIA
Completion %72%#462%#75MIA
Interception rate / Interceptions forced3.2%#902.8%#49FSU
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.09#76+0.11#73·
Rush success rate45%#5842%#66·
Rush explosiveness0.80#1280.86#18FSU
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.13#353.12#105MIA
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.14%#1615%#119MIA
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.83%#476%#104MIA
Yards / rush4.3#763.6#28FSU
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.16#42+0.09#66·
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.37#42+0.34#92MIA
Third-down conversion47%#1938%#59MIA
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.4.36#244.12#110MIA
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.12.1%#1415.5%#72MIA
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game0.94#251.17#79MIA

Season

FSUMIA
1-0Record1-0
34.0Points for / game45.0
17.0Points against / game6.0
1-0 / 0-0Home / road0-0 / 1-0
0-1Against the spread1-0
0-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.1-0
WLast 5W

Power ratings

FSUMIA
1590Elo1855
#50 of 240Rank#8 of 240
+2.2Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.+10.9
+6.0Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+18.3
1270Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1515

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

FSUMIA
+9.1SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.+22.0
0.271Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).0.218
0.162Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.052
46% / 42%Success rate (off / def)46% / 37%
1.35 / 1.16Explosiveness (off / def)1.16 / 1.27
800Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.886
40%Returning production37%

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

2025MIA 28 at FSU 22MIA · MIA covered
2024FSU 14 at MIA 36MIA · FSU covered
2023MIA 20 at FSU 27FSU · MIA covered

How the margin was built

Rating gap
MIA +14.7 pts
Home field
MIA +— pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
— pts on the total
Model margin
Model total

Market

Spread
MIA -16.5
Total
53.5
Moneyline
FSU +750 · MIA -1200

Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.