Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Western Illinois Leathernecks
0-2 last yr · #199 Elo
at
Sat, Sep 12, 7:15 PM ET
Camp Randall Stadium · 79° · Cloudy
Wisconsin Badgers
4-8 last yr · #104 Elo
Spread Total 43.5Moneyline WIU +3124 · WIS -45882 books · best WIU +3233 polymarketus · WIS -3900 polymarketus
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Solid
WIS -4588
69%
model margin WIS by 8.5
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.
No line
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.Lean
Over 43.5
51%
model total 45.3

The read

On rating alone Wisconsin Badgers are 5.5 points better (#104 vs #199 of 240), and WIS add 3.1 for home field.

Who has the edge

Model: WIS by 8.5
Rating
Clear edge
WIS
WIS rated 5.5 points better on Elo (#104 vs #199).
Home & rest
Clear edge
WIS
WIS gets 3.1 points for home field.
Passing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
WIS
WIS −5.6 per game over the last five, WIU −42.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: WIS by 8.5
Western Illinois LeathernecksWisconsin Badgers
1358 Elo · #199
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
WIS +5.5 pts
1456 Elo · #104
road
Home field
WIS +3.1 pts
home
7d
Rest
even
7d
−17.9 pts vs WIS D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
WIS +24.2 pts
+6.2 pts vs WIU D
L L · −42.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
WIS +18.2 pts
L W L W L · −5.6
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Season

WIUWIS
0-2Record4-8
5.0Points for / game12.8
47.0Points against / game21.6
0-0 / 0-2Home / road4-3 / 0-5
0-2Against the spread6-6
1-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.2-10
L LLast 5L W L W L

Season numbers are from 2025 until this season has games.

Power ratings

WIUWIS
1358Elo1456
#199 of 240Rank#104 of 240
−6.7Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−3.4
−9.6Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+11.3
Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
WIS +5.5 pts
Home field
WIS +3.1 pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
0.0 pts on the total
Model margin
WIS by 8.5
Model total
45.3 vs 43.5

Market · 2 books

Spread
Total
43.5
Moneyline
WIU +3124 · WIS -4588
Best price
WIU +3233 polymarketus · WIS -3900 polymarketus
BookWIS spreadTotalWIU MLWIS ML
kalshi+3015-5276
polymarketus43.5 (-117/+113)+3233-3900

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.