Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Tennessee Volunteers
1-0 · #19 Elo
at
Sat, Sep 12, 7:00 PM ET
Bobby Dodd Stadium · 85° · Mostly sunny
Spread TENN -12 (opened TENN -10.5)Total 55.5Moneyline TENN -502 · GT +3752 books · best TENN -455 draftkings · GT +400 fanduel
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Lean
TENN -502
59%
model margin TENN by 3.7
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.Lean +
GT +12
53%
8.3 pts from the number
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.Lean
Over 55.5
51%
model total 57.7

The read

On rating alone Tennessee Volunteers are 7.1 points better (#19 vs #45 of 240), and GT add 3.1 for home field; GT carry a rest edge worth 0.3. The model lands on TENN by 3.7 against a market TENN by 12, so the spread lean is GT by 8.3 points — a lean, not an edge: against closing lines this model covers about 49%. On the total the model sees 57.7 against 55.5.

Who has the edge

Model: TENN by 3.7 · market TENN by 12
Rating
Clear edge
TENN
TENN rated 7.1 points better on Elo (#45 vs #19).
Home & rest
Clear edge
GT
GT gets 3.1 points for home field and GT 0.3 for rest.
Passing game
Even
TENN passing ranks #19, GT defends it at #87; the other way GT #15 into TENN's #59.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
Even
TENN rushing ranks #9, GT defends it at #70; the other way GT #29 into TENN's #78.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
Even
TENN third-down conversion ranks #10, GT defends it at #79; the other way GT #22 into TENN's #89.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
TENN
GT −1.0 per game over the last five, TENN +47.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
Clear edge
TENN
Consensus has TENN by 12; the model says TENN by 3.7.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: TENN by 3.7 · market TENN by 12
Tennessee VolunteersGeorgia Tech Yellow Jackets
1731 Elo · #19
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
TENN +7.1 pts
1603 Elo · #45
road
Home field
GT +3.1 pts
home
7d
Rest
GT +0.3 pts
9d
+5.2 pts vs GT D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
TENN +9.6 pts
−4.4 pts vs TENN D
W · +47.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
TENN +24.0 pts
L · −1.0
+15.0
SP+ (last season)Bill Connelly's SP+ from last season, the prior the college model starts each season from.
TENN +5.7 pts
+9.3
TENN -12
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
TENN +12.0 pts
GT +12

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Biggest mismatches

  • GT rush success rate (#7) against a TENN defense ranked #122 at stopping it
  • GT completion % (#6) against a TENN defense ranked #118 at stopping it
  • TENN pass success rate (#9) against a GT defense ranked #107 at stopping it
  • TENN defense (#14 rush explosiveness allowed) against a GT offense ranked #109
  • TENN standard-down ppa (#3) against a GT defense ranked #97 at stopping it

A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.

Tennessee Volunteers offense vs Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets defense

ranks of 135
TENN offGT defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced48%49%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).74%70%·
Plays / game6561·
Possession / game27:2230:57·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.41#19+0.29#87TENN
Pass success rate50%#944%#107TENN
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.57#561.50#46·
Yards / pass attempt8.7#137.5#92TENN
Completion %67%#1962%#73TENN
Interception rate / Interceptions forced2.3%#641.7%#108TENN
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.26#9+0.11#70TENN
Rush success rate52%#343%#82TENN
Rush explosiveness0.96#720.98#82·
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.10#402.99#89TENN
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.14%#1119%#69TENN
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.85%#266%#27·
Yards / rush4.7#444.6#91TENN
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.28#3+0.15#97TENN
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.47#16+0.31#74TENN
Third-down conversion50%#1040%#79TENN
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.4.69#93.56#58TENN
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.12.4%#1913.7%#107TENN
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.15#550.69#130TENN

Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets offense vs Tennessee Volunteers defense

ranks of 135
GT offTENN defEdge
Identity
Pass rate / Pass rate faced46%49%·
Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains).75%69%·
Plays / game6561·
Possession / game29:0332:38·
Passing
Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD).+0.42#15+0.22#59GT
Pass success rate49%#1241%#67GT
Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are.1.49#981.53#53TENN
Yards / pass attempt8.7#157.2#70GT
Completion %70%#666%#118GT
Interception rate / Interceptions forced1.0%#102.3%#79GT
Rushing
Rushing PPA / play+0.19#29+0.12#78GT
Rush success rate51%#748%#122GT
Rush explosiveness0.88#1090.85#14TENN
Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed.3.38#82.89#71GT
Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line.16%#3320%#47·
Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2.71%#7482%#125GT
Yards / rush5.6#94.1#56GT
Situational
Standard-down PPA+0.22#24+0.12#84GT
Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+).+0.44#23+0.26#59GT
Third-down conversion46%#2241%#89GT
Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40.3.61#774.09#109GT
Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play.11.8%#1018.4%#19·
Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game1.15#511.54#37·

Season

TENNGT
1-0Record0-1
56.0Points for / game13.0
9.0Points against / game14.0
1-0 / 0-0Home / road0-1 / 0-0
0-1Against the spread0-1
0-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.0-1
WLast 5L

Power ratings

TENNGT
1731Elo1603
#19 of 240Rank#45 of 240
+11.9Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.+1.8
+6.3Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+6.8
1452Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1388

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Advanced

TENNGT
+17.3SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average.+5.9
0.332Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD).0.272
0.164Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better.0.195
51% / 44%Success rate (off / def)49% / 44%
1.27 / 1.16Explosiveness (off / def)1.16 / 1.25
886Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster.752
35%Returning production13%

Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
TENN +7.1 pts
Home field
GT +3.1 pts
Rest
GT +0.3 pts
Weather / roof
0.0 pts on the total
Model margin
TENN by 3.7
Model total
57.7 vs 55.5

Market · 2 books

Spread
TENN -12 · opened TENN -10.5
Total
55.5 · opened 56.5
Moneyline
TENN -502 · GT +375
Best price
TENN -455 draftkings · GT +400 fanduel
BookGT spreadTotalTENN MLGT ML
draftkings+10.5 (-110)56.5 (-108/-112)-455+350
fanduel+13.5 (-110)54.5 (-105/-115)-550+400
Spreadopened TENN -10.5 · now TENN -12 1.5
Totalopened 56.5 · now 55.5 1.0

Consensus of the books we track, hourly, since we first priced the game. The arrow on the spread is from the home side: ▲ means the home side is laying more.

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.