Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Monmouth Hawks
0-1 last yr · #124 Elo
at
Sat, Sep 12, 6:30 PM ET
Waldo Stadium · 80° · 13 mph wind · Mostly sunny
Spread Total Moneyline MONM +383 · WMU -17722 books · best MONM +567 polymarketus · WMU -788 kalshi
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Solid
WMU -1772
65%
model margin WMU by 6.8
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.
No line
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.
No line
model total 51.1

The read

On rating alone Western Michigan Broncos are 3.7 points better (#77 vs #124 of 240), and WMU add 3.1 for home field.

Who has the edge

Model: WMU by 6.8
Rating
Clear edge
WMU
WMU rated 3.7 points better on Elo (#77 vs #124).
Home & rest
Clear edge
WMU
WMU gets 3.1 points for home field.
Passing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Slight edge
WMU
WMU −1.0 per game over the last five, MONM −7.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: WMU by 6.8
Monmouth HawksWestern Michigan Broncos
1441 Elo · #124
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
WMU +3.7 pts
1508 Elo · #77
road
Home field
WMU +3.1 pts
home
7d
Rest
even
7d
−9.6 pts vs WMU D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
WMU +13.6 pts
+4.1 pts vs MONM D
L · −7.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
WMU +3.0 pts
L · −1.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Season

MONMWMU
0-1Record0-1
35.0Points for / game12.0
42.0Points against / game13.0
0-0 / 0-1Home / road0-0 / 0-1
0-1Against the spread1-0
1-0Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.0-1
LLast 5L

Season numbers are from 2025 until this season has games.

Power ratings

MONMWMU
1441Elo1508
#124 of 240Rank#77 of 240
+1.1Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−0.4
−4.5Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+10.6
Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1683

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
WMU +3.7 pts
Home field
WMU +3.1 pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
-0.4 pts on the total
Model margin
WMU by 6.8
Model total
51.1 vs —

Market · 2 books

Spread
Total
Moneyline
MONM +383 · WMU -1772
Best price
MONM +567 polymarketus · WMU -788 kalshi
BookWMU spreadTotalMONM MLWMU ML
kalshi+198-788
polymarketus+567-2757

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.