Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs
0-2 last yr · #165 Elo
at
Sat, Sep 12, 6:00 PM ET
Williams Stadium (VA) · 81° · Intermittent clouds
Liberty Flames
0-1 · #192 Elo
Spread Total Moneyline GWEB +375 · LIB -11482 books · best GWEB +376 polymarketus · LIB -967 kalshi
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Lean
LIB -1148
53%
model margin LIB by 1.1
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.
No line
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.
No line
model total 59.4

The read

On rating alone Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs are 1.9 points better (#165 vs #192 of 240), and LIB add 3.1 for home field.

Who has the edge

Model: LIB by 1.1
Rating
Slight edge
GWEB
GWEB rated 1.9 points better on Elo (#192 vs #165).
Home & rest
Clear edge
LIB
LIB gets 3.1 points for home field.
Passing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
LIB
LIB −7.0 per game over the last five, GWEB −32.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: LIB by 1.1
Gardner-Webb Runnin' BulldogsLiberty Flames
1398 Elo · #165
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
GWEB +1.9 pts
1364 Elo · #192
road
Home field
LIB +3.1 pts
home
7d
Rest
even
7d
−2.7 pts vs LIB D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
LIB +7.8 pts
+5.1 pts vs GWEB D
L L · −32.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
LIB +12.5 pts
L · −7.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Season

GWEBLIB
0-2Record0-1
23.5Points for / game13.0
55.5Points against / game20.0
0-0 / 0-2Home / road0-0 / 0-1
1-1Against the spread0-1
2-0Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.0-1
L LLast 5L

Season numbers are from 2025 until this season has games.

Power ratings

GWEBLIB
1398Elo1364
#165 of 240Rank#192 of 240
−1.4Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−0.7
−5.8Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+1.4
Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1700

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
GWEB +1.9 pts
Home field
LIB +3.1 pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
0.0 pts on the total
Model margin
LIB by 1.1
Model total
59.4 vs —

Market · 2 books

Spread
Total
Moneyline
GWEB +375 · LIB -1148
Best price
GWEB +376 polymarketus · LIB -967 kalshi
BookLIB spreadTotalGWEB MLLIB ML
kalshi+373-967
polymarketus+376-1329

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.