Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Sacred Heart Pioneers
0-0 last yr · #95 Elo
at
Sat, Sep 12, 3:30 PM ET
Warren McGuirk Alumni Stadium · 71° · 11 mph wind · Mostly sunny
Spread Total 75.5Moneyline SHU +292 · MASS -12832 books · best SHU +351 kalshi · MASS -1237 kalshi
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Strong
SHU +292
83%
model margin SHU by 16.1
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.
No line
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.Lean +
Under 75.5
57%
model total 56.7

The read

On rating alone Sacred Heart Pioneers are 19.5 points better (#95 vs #239 of 240), and MASS add 3.1 for home field; MASS carry a rest edge worth 0.3. On the total the model sees 56.7 against 75.5.

Who has the edge

Model: SHU by 16.1
Rating
Clear edge
SHU
SHU rated 19.5 points better on Elo (#239 vs #95).
Home & rest
Clear edge
MASS
MASS gets 3.1 points for home field and MASS 0.3 for rest.
Passing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
not priced
Not enough games.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: SHU by 16.1
Sacred Heart PioneersMassachusetts Minutemen
1465 Elo · #95
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
SHU +19.5 pts
1114 Elo · #239
road
Home field
MASS +3.1 pts
home
7d
Rest
MASS +0.3 pts
9d
+5.8 pts vs MASS D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
SHU +11.8 pts
−6.0 pts vs SHU D
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
not priced
W · +16.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Season

SHUMASS
0-0Record1-0
Points for / game37.0
Points against / game21.0
0-0 / 0-0Home / road0-0 / 1-0
0-0Against the spread1-0
0-0Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.1-0
Last 5W

Season numbers are from 2025 until this season has games.

Power ratings

SHUMASS
1465Elo1114
#95 of 240Rank#239 of 240
−2.0Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−6.9
−0.8Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.−7.7
Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1526

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
SHU +19.5 pts
Home field
MASS +3.1 pts
Rest
MASS +0.3 pts
Weather / roof
0.0 pts on the total
Model margin
SHU by 16.1
Model total
56.7 vs 75.5

Market · 2 books

Spread
Total
75.5
Moneyline
SHU +292 · MASS -1283
Best price
SHU +351 kalshi · MASS -1237 kalshi
BookMASS spreadTotalSHU MLMASS ML
kalshi+351-1237
polymarketus+233-1329

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.