Books price Gandra at 56% to win (vig removed) — our model has value of +2.3% on GandraEdge = our model's win probability minus the market's implied probability (after removing the sportsbook's margin). Positive = the model thinks this fighter wins more often than the odds suggest, so their price is the value side. Bigger gaps deserve more skepticism, not more money.
The model makes Gandra a solid 58% favorite, in line with the betting market. Expect Reese to chase the takedown (2.7/15 min at 61%) while Gandra tries to keep it standing behind 100% takedown defense. Gandra is most dangerous early — 7 of 10 tracked wins ended in the first round. Gandra's most likely path is by KO/TKO (40%), and the fight goes the distance 21% of the time — if it ends inside the distance, round 1 carries the most risk. The live danger for Gandra: 50% of Reese's wins come by knockout and 100% of Gandra's losses have come the same way.
Model: recent-fight output & defense rates (ESPN box stats), career method splits, durability, layoffs, and physical edges through a bounded logistic; weights tuned by walk-forward backtest on 1,523 UFC fights — 61% winner accuracy and 32% exact winner-plus-method on 192 held-out fights (vs 26% picking favorite-by-decision). Experimental — size responsibly.
| Book | Z. Reese to winPrice on this fighter winning by any method. Negative = favorite (risk that much to win $100); positive = underdog ($100 wins that much). | R. Gandra to win | RoundsTotal-rounds line. 2.5 = the bet is whether the fight gets past the halfway mark of round 3 (2:30). Over pays if it does. | O / U |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BetOnline | +115 | -135 | 1.5 | +135 / -155 |
| BetRivers | +110 | -136 | — | — / — |
| Bovada | +117 | -138 | 1.5 | +135 / -175 |
| DraftKings | +120 | -142 | 1.5 | +130 / -166 |
| FanDuel | +114 | -134 | — | — / — |
| Caesars | +118 | -140 | — | — / — |
