

The read
On rating alone Kennesaw State Owls are 8.3 points better (#74 vs #195 of 240), and KENN add 0.0 for home field. The clearest mismatch is the passing game: KENN passing ranks #44, FIU defends it at #78; the other way FIU #88 into KENN's #47.
Who has the edge
The margin, factor by factor
Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).
Dissect the matchup
CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)Biggest mismatches
- ▸KENN defense (#20 pass explosiveness allowed) against a FIU offense ranked #128
- ▸FIU rush explosiveness (#4) against a KENN defense ranked #103 at stopping it
- ▸KENN pass explosiveness (#19) against a FIU defense ranked #98 at stopping it
- ▸KENN power success (#17) against a FIU defense ranked #94 at stopping it
- ▸KENN defense (#25 passing-down ppa allowed) against a FIU offense ranked #94
A mismatch is a rank gap of at least a fifth of the league between an offense and the defense it faces on the same measure. Descriptive rows (pass rate, pace, direction) are shown for reading the game, not ranked. ▲▼ mark where the last three games sit clearly above or below the season number, in the direction that helps that side.
Florida International Panthers offense vs Kennesaw State Owls defense
ranks of 135| FIU off | KENN def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate faced | 49% | 46% | · |
| Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains). | 67% | 70% | · |
| Plays / game | 62 | 65 | · |
| Possession / game | 31:37 | 31:56 | · |
| Passing | |||
| Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD). | +0.21#88 | +0.19#47 | KENN |
| Pass success rate | 43%#54 | 41%#64 | · |
| Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are. | 1.39#128 | 1.45#20 | KENN |
| Yards / pass attempt | 6.5#104 | 7.3#79 | · |
| Completion % | 60%#90 | 61%#59 | KENN |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 2.8%#77 | 2.6%#54 | · |
| Rushing | |||
| Rushing PPA / play | +0.15#51 | +0.16#99 | FIU |
| Rush success rate | 39%#108 | 44%#87 | · |
| Rush explosiveness | 1.19#4 | 1.03#103 | FIU |
| Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed. | 2.84#82 | 2.97#81 | · |
| Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line. | 22%#120 | 19%#67 | KENN |
| Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2. | 74%#55 | 69%#52 | · |
| Yards / rush | 4.9#31 | 4.7#95 | FIU |
| Situational | |||
| Standard-down PPA | +0.12#61 | +0.14#95 | FIU |
| Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+). | +0.23#94 | +0.19#25 | KENN |
| Third-down conversion | 36%#104 | 39%#61 | KENN |
| Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 4.12#35 | 3.57#60 | · |
| Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play. | 16.9%#102 | 16.8%#45 | KENN |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 1.62#109 | 1.07#97 | · |
Kennesaw State Owls offense vs Florida International Panthers defense
ranks of 135| KENN off | FIU def | Edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | |||
| Pass rate / Pass rate faced | 45% | 51% | · |
| Standard-down shareShare of plays on standard downs (staying ahead of the chains). | 67% | 69% | · |
| Plays / game | 67 | 62 | · |
| Possession / game | 28:07 | 28:23 | · |
| Passing | |||
| Passing PPA / playPredicted points added per pass play (CFBD). | +0.33#44 | +0.26#78 | KENN |
| Pass success rate | 42%#65 | 41%#62 | · |
| Pass explosivenessPPA on successful pass plays — how big the wins are. | 1.71#19 | 1.61#98 | KENN |
| Yards / pass attempt | 8.0#34 | 7.1#69 | KENN |
| Completion % | 61%#76 | 61%#52 | · |
| Interception rate / Interceptions forced | 2.1%#57 | 2.8%#46 | · |
| Rushing | |||
| Rushing PPA / play | +0.11#69 | +0.12#85 | · |
| Rush success rate | 42%#89 | 46%#108 | · |
| Rush explosiveness | 1.03#46 | 0.94#55 | · |
| Line yards / rushYards credited to the offensive line (first 4 yards weighted). Defense column: allowed. | 2.84#84 | 3.21#118 | KENN |
| Stuff rate / Stuff rate forcedRushes stopped at or behind the line. | 20%#98 | 16%#114 | · |
| Power successConversion rate on 3rd/4th and ≤2, or goal-to-go from the 2. | 80%#17 | 75%#94 | KENN |
| Yards / rush | 4.2#87 | 4.7#101 | · |
| Situational | |||
| Standard-down PPA | +0.06#97 | +0.11#76 | · |
| Passing-down PPAObvious passing situations (2nd & 8+, 3rd/4th & 5+). | +0.39#38 | +0.29#66 | KENN |
| Third-down conversion | 40%#67 | 40%#69 | · |
| Points / scoring opportunityPoints per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 2.95#125 | 3.65#67 | FIU |
| Havoc rate faced / Havoc rateTFLs, forced fumbles, interceptions and passes defensed per play. | 15.2%#61 | 16.4%#53 | · |
| Turnovers / game / Takeaways / game | 1.29#71 | 1.62#30 | FIU |
Season
| FIU | KENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | Record | 1-0 |
| 9.0 | Points for / game | 47.0 |
| 19.0 | Points against / game | 0.0 |
| 0-0 / 0-1 | Home / road | 1-0 / 0-0 |
| 1-0 | Against the spread | 1-0 |
| 0-1 | Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean. | 0-1 |
| L | Last 5 | W |
Power ratings
| FIU | KENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 1360 | Elo | 1509 |
| #195 of 240 | Rank | #74 of 240 |
| −0.5 | Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted. | +2.7 |
| +1.0 | Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good. | +3.6 |
| 1662 | Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season. | 1500 |
Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.
Advanced
| FIU | KENN | |
|---|---|---|
| −14.5 | SP+ (this season)Bill Connelly's SP+ rating, points above average. | −12.9 |
| 0.156 | Offense PPA / playPredicted points added per play, garbage time excluded (CFBD). | 0.170 |
| 0.165 | Defense PPA / playPPA allowed per play — lower is better. | 0.157 |
| 41% / 43% | Success rate (off / def) | 41% / 42% |
| 1.31 / 1.27 | Explosiveness (off / def) | 1.35 / 1.22 |
| 608 | Talent composite247Sports team talent composite for the current roster. | 503 |
| 32% | Returning production | 6% |
Advanced stats are from 2025 until this season has about three games. Source: CollegeFootballData.
Head to head
| 2025 | KENN 45 at FIU 26 | KENN · KENN covered |
| 2024 | FIU 26 at KENN 27 | KENN · KENN covered |
How the margin was built
- Rating gap
- KENN +8.3 pts
- Home field
- KENN +— pts
- Rest
- Even
- Weather / roof
- — pts on the total
- Model margin
- —
- Model total
- —
Market
- Spread
- —
- Total
- —
- Moneyline
- —
Per-book prices appear once the multi-book feed has this game (about a week out).
Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.