Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Fordham Rams
0-1 · #163 Elo
at
Sat, Sep 12, 7:30 PM ET
Brooks Stadium (SC) · 83° · Mostly cloudy w/ t-storms
Spread Total Moneyline FOR +441 · CCU -14982 books · best FOR +456 polymarketus · CCU -1429 kalshi
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Lean
FOR +441
57%
model margin FOR by 2.9
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.
No line
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.
No line
model total 58.4

The read

On rating alone Fordham Rams are 6.0 points better (#163 vs #222 of 240), and CCU add 3.1 for home field.

Who has the edge

Model: FOR by 2.9
Rating
Clear edge
FOR
FOR rated 6.0 points better on Elo (#222 vs #163).
Home & rest
Clear edge
CCU
CCU gets 3.1 points for home field.
Passing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
CCU
CCU −7.0 per game over the last five, FOR −38.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: FOR by 2.9
Fordham RamsCoastal Carolina Chanticleers
1400 Elo · #163
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
FOR +6.0 pts
1292 Elo · #222
road
Home field
CCU +3.1 pts
home
7d
Rest
even
7d
−2.1 pts vs CCU D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
CCU +5.5 pts
+3.4 pts vs FOR D
L · −38.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
CCU +15.5 pts
L · −7.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Season

FORCCU
0-1Record0-1
0.0Points for / game24.0
38.0Points against / game31.0
0-0 / 0-1Home / road0-0 / 0-1
1-0Against the spread1-0
0-1Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.1-0
LLast 5L

Power ratings

FORCCU
1400Elo1292
#163 of 240Rank#222 of 240
−5.6Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−2.5
−6.0Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.−3.5
1520Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.1422

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
FOR +6.0 pts
Home field
CCU +3.1 pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
0.0 pts on the total
Model margin
FOR by 2.9
Model total
58.4 vs —

Market · 2 books

Spread
Total
Moneyline
FOR +441 · CCU -1498
Best price
FOR +456 polymarketus · CCU -1429 kalshi
BookCCU spreadTotalFOR MLCCU ML
kalshi+425-1429
polymarketus+456-1567

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.