Probetrics — Sports Analytics
College Football slate
Colgate Raiders
0-1 last yr · #147 Elo
at
Sat, Sep 12, 1:00 PM ET
Kelly/Shorts Stadium · 75° · 10 mph wind · Intermittent clouds
Spread Total Moneyline COLG +449 · CMU -9332 books · best COLG +525 polymarketus · CMU -900 polymarketus
WinnerProbability the picked team wins, from a normal on the model's predicted margin. Backtested and calibrated: when it says 65%, it has been right about 63–65% of the time.Lean
CMU -933
52%
model margin CMU by 1.1
SpreadWhich side the model's margin lands on versus the spread. A lean, not a proven edge: against closing NFL lines the model covers about 49% in backtest, so this is tracked in public rather than sold.
No line
TotalModel total (scoring ratings + weather + roof) versus the posted total. Same caveat as the spread: a lean, tracked in public.
No line
model total 54.0

The read

On rating alone Colgate Raiders are 2.0 points better (#147 vs #185 of 240), and CMU add 3.1 for home field.

Who has the edge

Model: CMU by 1.1
Rating
Slight edge
COLG
COLG rated 2.0 points better on Elo (#185 vs #147).
Home & rest
Clear edge
CMU
CMU gets 3.1 points for home field.
Passing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Rushing game
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Third down & red zone
not priced
Ranks unavailable.
context · not in the margin
Form (last 5)
Clear edge
CMU
CMU −31.0 per game over the last five, COLG −42.0.
context · not in the margin
Market
not priced
No line yet.
context · not in the margin

The margin, factor by factor

Model: CMU by 1.1
Colgate RaidersCentral Michigan Chippewas
1415 Elo · #147
RatingThe Elo gap in points — the model's core read on who is better, before the situational pieces below.
COLG +2.0 pts
1379 Elo · #185
road
Home field
CMU +3.1 pts
home
7d
Rest
even
7d
−5.3 pts vs CMU D
Offense vs defenseEach offense's scoring rating against the other defense's — what drives the model total. Shown as an edge, though the winner call runs on Elo.
CMU +7.6 pts
+2.3 pts vs COLG D
L · −42.0
Form (last 5)Average margin over the last five games. Already inside the ratings — listed so you can see when recent form and the rating disagree.
CMU +5.5 pts
L · −31.0
MarketThe consensus spread, read as points. Compare with the model margin above it.
not priced

Bars are in points toward the favored side. Blue factors are inside the model's margin; grey ones are context it does not add on top (form and offense/defense are already in the ratings; injuries beyond the quarterback are not priced).

Dissect the matchup

CollegeFootballData, garbage time excluded · 2025 season (last season until three games are in)

Season

COLGCMU
0-1Record0-1
24.0Points for / game7.0
66.0Points against / game38.0
0-0 / 0-1Home / road0-0 / 0-1
0-1Against the spread0-1
1-0Over / underOvers–unders in this team's games. A tendency, not a lean.0-1
LLast 5L

Season numbers are from 2025 until this season has games.

Power ratings

COLGCMU
1415Elo1379
#147 of 240Rank#185 of 240
−2.8Offense ratingPoints per game above league average scored, opponent-adjusted.−3.8
−6.1Defense ratingPoints per game below league average allowed, opponent-adjusted. Positive is good.+2.5
Strength of scheduleMean Elo of opponents faced this season.

Elo drives the winner call. Offense/defense ratings drive the total.

Head to head

No meetings in our history.

How the margin was built

Rating gap
COLG +2.0 pts
Home field
CMU +3.1 pts
Rest
Even
Weather / roof
0.0 pts on the total
Model margin
CMU by 1.1
Model total
54.0 vs —

Market · 2 books

Spread
Total
Moneyline
COLG +449 · CMU -933
Best price
COLG +525 polymarketus · CMU -900 polymarketus
BookCMU spreadTotalCOLG MLCMU ML
kalshi+373-967
polymarketus+525-900

Informational only. Winner probabilities are backtested and calibrated; spread and total calls are tracked leans. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.