The pickThe locked winner and its win probability. A priced game's number is built on the market's no-vig price; the model's own margin and total sit beside the market's below, as context.
backtest · not locked
Win chance
63%St. Francis (PA) Red FlashSolid
No moneyline was priced into this call, so it is the model's own number.
Model marginThe model's own predicted margin beside the market's number. Context for reading the game: the model makes no spread pick.
SFPA by 5.5market ULM by 30.5
Model totalThe model's own predicted total points beside the market's number. Context for reading the game: the model makes no over/under pick.
50.4 pointsmarket 47.5
Backtest, not locked: this game finished before the model ran on it; the calls were reconstructed from pre-game information.
Why the model calls itThe reasons behind the winner call, in plain sentences drawn from this page's numbers.
The model has St. Francis (PA) Red Flash at 63% to win, with the market at ULM by 30.5.
No single matchup area stands out; the call rests on the teams' overall results this season, adjusted for who they played.
Form: ULM has the better last five games by 17.0 points a game (ULM -17.0, SFPA -34.0).
Home field is with ULM, which the pick has to overcome.
ContextThe model makes it SFPA by 5.5 against a market ULM by 30.5: 36.0 points of daylight in SFPA's favour. The model's total is 50.4 against a line of 47.5: 2.9 points above it.The model makes no spread or over/under pick: neither has shown an edge over the market in our backtests.
Matchup context: who has the advantageWhich team has the advantage in each area, and how clearly. Context for reading the game, not model inputs.
Model SFPA by 5.5 · market ULM by 30.5
ⓘMost of these areas favor ULM, but the model still picks SFPA. The model rates each team on its full body of results, adjusted for who it played, plus the quarterback, rest, home field and weather. Single-area matchups like these are shown for context: over past seasons, when they point the other way the winner has been close to a coin flip, so they have not been a better guide than the ratings.
Passing game
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Rushing game
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Third down & red zone
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Big plays
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Pass protection & rush
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Ball security
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Form (last 5)
ULM
Clear advantage
ULM −17.0 per game over the last five, SFPA −34.0.
Market
ULM
Clear advantage
Consensus has ULM by 30.5; the model says SFPA by 5.5.
the market, for comparison
Where the lines sitWhere the market's number and the model's sit among every final margin and total in the league's history; the highlighted bars are the games that landed between the two.
3,154 FBS games since 2023
Marginmarket ULM by 30.5 · model SFPA by 5.5
Mkt ULM 30.5
Model SFPA 5.5
← SFPA by 28tieULM by 28 →
56.0% of FBS games land between the two numbers. The model’s number is across the key numbers 3 and 7 and 10 and 14. Most common margins: 3 (9.3%), 7 (7.5%), 10 (4.3%), 14 (4.1%).
Totalmarket 47.5 · model 50.4
Mkt 47.5
Model 50.4
24 pts6096 pts
7.0% of FBS games finish between 47.5 and 50.4. The league’s median total since 2023 is 53.
The model alone was backtested walk-forward (each game priced only from what came before it). Since the winner call started following the market, the calibration that counts is the record of locked picks on the results page. Margin and total are context, not picks. Model reads, not personalized advice. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
