Loading the game…
⌘K
Grand Canyon beat Utah Tech 79–66 at Utah Tech on Jan 25, 2025.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  GCU | 34 | 45 | 79 |
  UTU | 21 | 45 | 66 |
Grand Canyon LopesUtah Tech Trailblazers| GCU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Brennan | 30 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 5-6 | 0-0 |
| Ray Harrison | 29 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 3-4 | 1-2 |
| JaKobe Coles | 28 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 6-8 | 1-2 |
| Makaih Williams | 27 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 3-10 | 0-1 |
| Collin Moore | 26 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Caleb Shaw | 22 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 5-7 | 2-4 |
| Lok Wur | 18 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3-6 | 0-2 |
| Tyon Grant-Foster | 16 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-1 |
| Traivar Jackson | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Austin Maurer | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 79 | 32 | 13 | 28-48 | 4-13 |
| UTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noa Gonsalves | 35 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-4 |
| Hakim Byrd | 31 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 4-14 | 2-8 |
| Beon Riley | 30 | 19 | 11 | 4 | 5-15 | 1-3 |
| Samuel Ariyibi | 21 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Justin Bieker | 15 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| Madiba Owona | 25 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 4-10 | 0-3 |
| Tennessee Rainwater | 18 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3-6 | 1-2 |
| Pavle Misic | 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Britton Berrett | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Unisa Turay | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-1 |
| Stone Hutchings | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 66 | 25 | 13 | 24-65 | 6-23 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
GCU offense ranks better in 3 of 4 matchups (3 by a clear margin) · UTU defense in 1 (1 by a clear margin)
UTU offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · GCU defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
GCUUTUExpected pace: about 70 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
GCUUTUNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Beon Riley's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ray Harrison | 30.7 | 11.3 | 2.5 | 3.0 |
| JaKobe Coles | 27.4 | 12.9 | 5.2 | 2.4 |
| Tyon Grant-Foster | 27.3 | 13.9 | 6.6 | 1.9 |
| Duke Brennan | 26.0 | 10.5 | 8.6 | 0.4 |
| Collin Moore | 25.9 | 9.1 | 3.9 | 2.4 |
| Lok Wur | 23.0 | 8.9 | 4.5 | 0.6 |
| Makaih Williams | 21.7 | 6.9 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| Caleb Shaw | 14.7 | 4.3 | 1.7 | 0.9 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noa Gonsalves | 35.3 | 14.4 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Beon Riley | 32.5 | 15.1 | 7.6 | 1.8 |
| Hakim Byrd | 32.4 | 9.6 | 1.6 | 3.3 |
| Justin Bieker | 26.3 | 8.1 | 3.2 | 1.7 |
| Samuel Ariyibi | 24.3 | 7.6 | 4.7 | 1.9 |
| Tennessee Rainwater | 18.3 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 1.3 |
| Madiba Owona | 15.0 | 5.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 |
| Britton Berrett | 11.9 | 3.8 | 1.7 | 0.5 |
GCU offenseper gameUTU defenseRank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
GCUForAgainst47% of GCU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
UTUForAgainst46% of UTU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
GCU 9series1 UTU| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2025 | UTU 68 | GCU 90 | GCU+22 | +22 |
| Jan 25, 2025 | GCU 79 | UTU 66 | GCU+13 | +13 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2024 | UTU 61 | GCU 73 | GCU+12 | +12 |
| Jan 6, 2024 | GCU 75 | UTU 65 | GCU+10 | +10 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2023 | GCU 71 | UTU 61 | GCU+10 | +10 |
| Jan 18, 2023 | UTU 85 | GCU 89 | GCU+4 | +4 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2022 | UTU 53 | GCU 70 | GCU+17 | +17 |
| Feb 12, 2022 | GCU 60 | UTU 61 | UTU+1 | +1 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2021 | GCU 81 | UTU 46 | GCU+35 | +35 |
| Jan 22, 2021 | GCU 77 | UTU 74 | GCU+3 | +3 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
