Lafayette vs George Washington — College Basketball, Dec 18, 2024

George Washington beat Lafayette 82–62 at home on Dec 18, 2024.

FinalWed, Dec 18

Lafayette Leopards

12-20 · 3-14 on the road

62

George Washington Revolutionaries

20-12 · 15-4 at home

82

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
LAF	24	38	62
GW	36	46	82

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Lafayette Leopards

• Alex ChaikinG

  19 pts · 1 reb
  7-11 FG

  3-6 3PT
• Andrew PhillipsG

  13 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  5-11 FG

  1-5 3PT
• Caleb WilliamsG

  8 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
  3-7 FG

  1-2 3PT

George Washington Revolutionaries

• Gerald Drumgoole Jr.G

  30 pts · 4 reb · 2 ast
  10-15 FG

  6-11 3PT
• Trey AutryG

  12 pts · 3 reb
  5-8 FG

  0-3 3PT
• Darren Buchanan Jr.G

  11 pts · 4 reb · 2 ast
  3-4 FG

  1-2 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

LAF	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Mark Butler	29	6	0	3	1	0	1	3-7	0-0	0-0	—
Caleb Williams	21	8	5	1	1	0	2	3-7	1-2	1-2	—
Andrew Phillips	20	13	3	1	1	0	1	5-11	1-5	2-3	—
Ryan Pettit	20	5	2	2	4	0	1	2-5	1-3	0-0	—
Justin Vander Baan	17	5	6	1	0	3	1	2-5	0-1	1-1	—
Alex Chaikin	21	19	1	0	0	0	2	7-11	3-6	2-2	—
Luka Savicevic	20	0	1	1	2	0	1	0-4	0-4	0-1	—
Misha Bednostin	18	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Joshua Wyche	13	0	2	3	0	0	1	0-1	0-0	0-2	—
Chris Rubayo	9	0	1	1	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Malik Rasul	8	6	0	0	0	0	2	3-6	0-1	0-0	—
TJ Berger	3	0	1	0	0	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Folabomi Fayemi	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		62	22	13	9	3	13	25-59	6-22	6-11

GW	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Darren Buchanan Jr.	31	11	4	2	0	0	0	3-4	1-2	4-4	—
Gerald Drumgoole Jr.	27	30	4	2	0	0	4	10-15	6-11	4-5	—
Rafael Castro	22	10	9	1	0	4	2	3-5	0-0	4-4	—
Jacoi Hutchinson	21	2	4	1	1	0	3	1-7	0-4	0-0	—
Trey Moss	20	2	2	2	3	0	1	1-4	0-3	0-0	—
Christian Jones	22	7	5	2	0	1	2	3-6	1-3	0-0	—
Trey Autry	19	12	3	0	0	0	0	5-8	0-3	2-2	—
Sean Hansen	18	2	7	3	4	1	3	1-3	0-0	0-0	—
Ty Bevins	11	2	1	1	2	0	0	0-2	0-1	2-2	—
Dayan Nessah	9	4	2	1	0	0	0	2-5	0-1	0-0	—
Totals		82	41	15	10	6	15	29-59	8-28	16-17

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

LAFGW

42.4%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 25-59, home 29-59.

49.2%

27.3%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 6-22, home 8-28.

28.6%

54.5%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 6-11, home 16-17.

94.1%

26

Rebounds

43

11

Offensive rebounds

16

13

Assists

15

13

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

15

9

Steals

10

3

Blocks

6

30

Points in the paint

40

8

Fast-break points

13

15

Fouls?Fewer is better.

11

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 360 (#1 = best)

LAF offensevsGW defense

LAF offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · GW defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.2%

#206

48.4%

Stronger#67

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

14.9%

#166

16.8%

Stronger#70

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.0%

#328

32.7%

slight#313

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.1%

#275

19.5%

Stronger#41

GW offensevsLAF defense

GW offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · LAF defense in 3

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.6%

#184

50.4%

slight#150

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.8%

#236

14.7%

slight#203

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

32.1%

#111

28.0%

slight#85

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

28.6%

#41slight

19.8%

#49

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

LAFGW

−2.8 225thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions84th +7.1

102.6 281stOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions152nd 108.3

105.4 130thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)49th 101.3

66.1 267thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)210th 67.2

Expected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  GW getting to the line

  GW offense 28.6% (41st) vs LAF defense allowing 19.8% (49th)
  +8 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

MTWTFSSMTGame

LAF

GW

10 days rest

MTWTFSSMTGame

GW

ARMY

LAF

4 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

LAF · last 10

12-20 · 10 days rest

• Dec 7 @ MERCW 77–73
• Dec 1 vs BINGL 81–82
• Nov 30 vs NIAW 59–47
• Nov 29 vs LIUW 75–56
• Nov 20 @ URIL 72–86
• Nov 16 @ CORL 71–81
• Nov 12 vs PENNW 65–63
• Nov 9 @ LASL 60–81
• Nov 4 @ VILLL 63–75
• Mar 7 vs LEH2023–24L 61–76

4-6 in these

GW · last 10

20-12 · 4 days rest

• Dec 13 vs ARMYW 75–60
• Dec 7 @ ODUW 78–70
• Dec 4 @ AMERL 71–81
• Nov 29 vs VMIW 77–64
• Nov 25 vs ILSTW 72–64
• Nov 23 vs ULW 83–74
• Nov 22 @ KSUL 71–83
• Nov 18 vs NJITW 84–64
• Nov 12 vs NCATW 85–80
• Nov 8 vs HAMPW 82–54

8-2 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.