Mount St. Mary's vs Long Island University — College Basketball, Dec 18, 2024

Mount St. Mary's beat Long Island University 80–72 at Long Island University on Dec 18, 2024.

FinalWed, Dec 18

Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers

20-12 · 12-8 on the road

80

Long Island University Sharks

14-14 · 7-5 at home

72

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
MSM	34	46	80
LIU	29	43	72

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Mount St. Mary's Mountaineers

• Dola AdebayoF

  16 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
  5-11 FG

  2-3 3PT
• Abdou Khadre KébéG

  12 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
  3-9 FG

  2-7 3PT
• Javon ErvinG

  11 pts · 1 reb
  2-9 FG

  0-3 3PT

Long Island University Sharks

• Malachi DavisG

  23 pts · 4 reb · 4 ast
  6-18 FG

  0-4 3PT
• Blake LanderG

  12 pts · 1 reb
  4-6 FG

  2-4 3PT
• Shadrak LasuF

  9 pts · 10 reb · 2 ast · 4 blk
  2-5 FG

  0-1 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

MSM	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Xavier Lipscomb	32	8	4	4	1	0	2	2-6	2-3	2-2	—
Dola Adebayo	30	16	5	1	2	1	2	5-11	2-3	4-5	—
Carmelo Pacheco	26	6	1	1	0	0	0	2-8	2-7	0-0	—
Javon Ervin	20	11	1	0	0	0	1	2-9	0-3	7-10	—
Jedy Cordilia	18	4	6	1	0	0	0	1-3	0-0	2-5	—
Terrell Ard Jr.	26	10	11	7	3	0	3	2-7	0-0	6-8	—
Abdou Khadre Kébé	23	12	4	1	0	0	1	3-9	2-7	4-5	—
Arlandus Keyes	17	9	4	1	3	0	2	2-7	1-5	4-4	—
Trey Wilson	4	4	1	0	2	0	0	1-1	0-0	2-2	—
Patrick Haigh	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Totals		80	37	16	11	1	11	20-62	9-29	31-41

LIU	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Malachi Davis	40	23	4	4	1	1	5	6-18	0-4	11-14	—
Shadrak Lasu	36	9	10	2	1	4	3	2-5	0-1	5-7	—
Jamal Fuller	31	5	5	1	0	1	2	1-3	0-2	3-5	—
Jalen Lee	22	8	4	2	1	0	1	2-7	1-2	3-4	—
Terell Strickland	9	3	1	2	0	0	0	1-2	1-2	0-0	—
Blake Lander	28	12	1	0	2	0	3	4-6	2-4	2-2	—
Xinyi Li	23	9	3	2	1	1	2	4-5	1-1	0-0	—
Jason Steele	10	3	6	1	1	0	1	1-3	1-2	0-0	—
Gavin Pendergast	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		72	34	14	7	7	17	21-49	6-18	24-32

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

MSMLIU

32.3%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 20-62, home 21-49.

42.9%

31.0%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 9-29, home 6-18.

33.3%

75.6%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 31-41, home 24-32.

75.0%

42

Rebounds

36

21

Offensive rebounds

11

16

Assists

14

12

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

18

11

Steals

7

1

Blocks

7

22

Points in the paint

26

10

Fast-break points

14

19

Fouls?Fewer is better.

28

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 360 (#1 = best)

MSM offensevsLIU defense

MSM offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · LIU defense in 3 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.2%

#145

47.7%

Stronger#44

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

19.0%

#354

17.2%

Stronger#52

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.0%

#144

27.7%

Stronger#72

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

22.5%

#227Stronger

32.9%

#354

LIU offensevsMSM defense

LIU offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · MSM defense in 4 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

47.8%

#304

48.2%

Stronger#58

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

17.5%

#332

13.8%

slight#272

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.8%

#122

28.3%

slight#99

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

20.0%

#313

19.9%

Stronger#54

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

MSMLIU

−1.1 195thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions202nd −1.7

102.4 284thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions320th 99.3

103.6 87thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)41st 101.0

68.0 176thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)274th 65.9

Expected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  MSM getting to the line

  MSM offense 22.5% (227th) vs LIU defense allowing 32.9% (354th)
  +127 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

MTWTFSSMTGame

MSM

L-MD

LIU

3 days rest

MTWTFSSMTGame

LIU

UML

MIZ

MSM

3 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

MSM · last 10

20-12 · 3 days rest

• Dec 14 vs L-MDL 69–77
• Dec 8 vs FAIRW 101–94
• Dec 6 @ MRSTL 50–53
• Nov 30 @ HOWW 79–75
• Nov 23 vs DSUW 76–66
• Nov 20 @ GTWNL 51–79
• Nov 13 @ BUCKW 93–89
• Nov 8 @ MDL 52–86
• Mar 12 vs CAN2023–24L 61–77
• Mar 9 vs FAIR2023–24L 92–96

4-6 in these

LIU · last 10

14-14 · 3 days rest

• Dec 14 @ MIZL 61–88
• Dec 11 @ UMLL 62–69
• Dec 1 @ NIAL 52–60
• Nov 30 vs BINGL 70–75
• Nov 29 @ LAFL 56–75
• Nov 25 @ WINL 65–87
• Nov 23 @ CLTW 79–76
• Nov 20 vs COLUL 72–80
• Nov 15 @ CBUL 77–90
• Nov 11 @ AFW 63–54

2-8 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.