Loading the game…
⌘K
Middle Tennessee beat Abilene Christian 79–56 at Abilene Christian on Nov 9, 2024.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  MTSU | 44 | 35 | 79 |
  ACU | 30 | 26 | 56 |
Middle Tennessee Blue RaidersAbilene Christian Wildcats| MTSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camryn Weston | 31 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 5-8 | 3-4 |
| Jestin Porter | 30 | 24 | 1 | 2 | 9-14 | 2-5 |
| Justin Bufford | 27 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Essam Mostafa | 22 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 6-9 | 0-0 |
| Kamari Lands | 18 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3-6 | 0-2 |
| Jlynn Counter | 21 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 6-9 | 1-3 |
| Chris Loofe | 15 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Torey Alston | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Jacob Johnson | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
| Tre Green | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Christian Fussell | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
| Jarred Hall | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jack Jubenville | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Isiah Lightsy | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 79 | 30 | 13 | 31-60 | 6-17 |
| ACU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Jack Madden | 33 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2-9 | 1-7 |
| Joseph Venzant | 30 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 4-6 | 0-0 |
| Leonardo Bettiol | 23 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Quion Williams | 22 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0-6 | 0-2 |
| Nasir DeGruy | 21 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2-8 | 0-2 |
| Rich Smith | 17 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Dontrez Williams | 14 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Cade Hornecker | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| Bradyn Hubbard | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Christian Alston | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Ma'Shy Hill | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Colby Tanner | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Yaniel Rivera | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 56 | 29 | 9 | 19-49 | 2-14 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
MTSU offense ranks better in 3 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · ACU defense in 1 (1 by a clear margin)
ACU offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · MTSU defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
MTSUACUExpected pace: about 70 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
No props posted for this game yet. Books usually post them the day of the game; see the full props board.
MTSU offenseper gameACU defenseRank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
MTSUForAgainst46% of MTSU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
ACUForAgainst44% of ACU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
MTSU 2series0 ACU| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2024 | MTSU 79 | ACU 56 | MTSU+23 | +23 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2022 | MTSU 85 | ACU 69 | MTSU+16 | +16 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
