The pickThe locked winner and its win probability. A priced game's number is built on the market's no-vig price; the model's own margin and total sit beside the market's below, as context.
backtest · not locked
Win chance
75%UT Martin SkyhawksStrong
No moneyline was priced into this call, so it is the model's own number.
Model marginThe model's own predicted margin beside the market's number. Context for reading the game: the model makes no spread pick.
UTM by 11.5market UTEP by 7.5
Model totalThe model's own predicted total points beside the market's number. Context for reading the game: the model makes no over/under pick.
47.3 pointsmarket 49.5
Backtest, not locked: this game finished before the model ran on it; the calls were reconstructed from pre-game information.
Why the model calls itThe reasons behind the winner call, in plain sentences drawn from this page's numbers.
The model has UT Martin Skyhawks at 75% to win, with the market at UTEP by 7.5.
No single matchup area stands out; the call rests on the teams' overall results this season, adjusted for who they played.
Rest: UTM has 2 more days since its last game (UTEP 7d, UTM 9d).
Form: UTEP has the better last five games by 13.1 points a game (UTEP -12.6, UTM -25.7).
Home field is with UTEP, which the pick has to overcome.
ContextThe model makes it UTM by 11.5 against a market UTEP by 7.5: 19.0 points of daylight in UTM's favour. The model's total is 47.3 against a line of 49.5: 2.2 points below it.The model makes no spread or over/under pick: neither has shown an edge over the market in our backtests.
Matchup context: who has the advantageWhich team has the advantage in each area, and how clearly. Context for reading the game, not model inputs.
Model UTM by 11.5 · market UTEP by 7.5
ⓘMost of these areas favor UTEP, but the model still picks UTM. The model rates each team on its full body of results, adjusted for who it played, plus the quarterback, rest, home field and weather. Single-area matchups like these are shown for context: over past seasons, when they point the other way the winner has been close to a coin flip, so they have not been a better guide than the ratings.
Passing game
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Rushing game
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Third down & red zone
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Big plays
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Pass protection & rush
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Ball security
–
—
not priced
No tendency data yet.
Form (last 5)
UTEP
Clear advantage
UTEP −12.6 per game over the last five, UTM −25.7.
Market
UTEP
Clear advantage
Consensus has UTEP by 7.5; the model says UTM by 11.5.
the market, for comparison
Where the lines sitWhere the market's number and the model's sit among every final margin and total in the league's history; the highlighted bars are the games that landed between the two.
3,154 FBS games since 2023
Marginmarket UTEP by 7.5 · model UTM by 11.5
Mkt UTEP 7.5
Model UTM 11.5
← UTM by 28tieUTEP by 28 →
34.8% of FBS games land between the two numbers. The model’s number is across the key numbers 3 and 7 and 10. Most common margins: 3 (9.3%), 7 (7.5%), 10 (4.3%), 14 (4.1%).
Totalmarket 49.5 · model 47.3
Mkt 49.5
Model 47.3
24 pts6096 pts
5.4% of FBS games finish between 49.5 and 47.3. The league’s median total since 2023 is 53.
The model alone was backtested walk-forward (each game priced only from what came before it). Since the winner call started following the market, the calibration that counts is the record of locked picks on the results page. Margin and total are context, not picks. Model reads, not personalized advice. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
