Hawai'i vs UC Irvine — College Basketball, Mar 14, 2026

Hawai'i beat UC Irvine 71–64 at a neutral site on Mar 14, 2026.

FinalSat, Mar 14Neutral siteConference game

Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors

22-8 · 7-5 on the road

71

UC Irvine Anteaters

21-11 · 12-6 at home

64

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
HAW	31	40	71
UCI	30	34	64

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors

• Isaac JohnsonC

  22 pts · 7 reb · 2 ast · 3 blk
  10-18 FG

  2-8 3PT
• Harry RouhliadeffF

  15 pts · 12 reb · 2 ast · Double-double
  6-13 FG

  2-3 3PT
• Dre BullockG

  15 pts · 7 reb · 2 ast · 4 stl
  4-10 FG

  1-3 3PT

UC Irvine Anteaters

• Jurian DixonG

  17 pts · 4 reb · 3 ast · 3 stl
  6-15 FG

  2-5 3PT
• Kyle EvansF

  13 pts · 10 reb · 3 blk · Double-double
  5-10 FG
• Derin SaranG

  13 pts · 5 reb · 2 ast
  4-15 FG

  1-3 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

HAW	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Dre Bullock	37	15	7	2	4	1	1	4-10	1-3	6-7	—
Hunter Erickson	32	3	2	8	0	1	4	1-6	1-4	0-0	—
Isaac Johnson	25	22	7	2	0	3	3	10-18	2-8	0-0	—
Harry Rouhliadeff	25	15	12	2	2	1	2	6-13	2-3	1-2	—
Isaac Finlinson	23	4	3	0	1	0	1	1-5	0-3	2-6	—
Isaiah Kerr	28	10	1	3	0	0	0	4-7	2-3	0-0	—
Gytis Nemeiksa	23	0	4	0	0	3	0	0-4	0-2	0-0	—
Yacine Toumi	7	2	3	0	0	1	2	1-3	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		71	39	17	7	10	13	27-66	8-26	9-15

UCI	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Kyle Evans	35	13	10	0	0	3	1	5-10	0-0	3-3	—
Derin Saran	35	13	5	2	2	0	2	4-15	1-3	4-4	—
Jurian Dixon	34	17	4	3	3	1	1	6-15	2-5	3-4	—
Tama Isaac	19	0	1	0	0	0	2	0-2	0-1	0-0	—
Akiva McBirney-Griffin	6	2	1	0	1	1	0	1-2	0-0	0-0	—
Andre Henry	29	12	3	3	0	0	2	4-9	2-2	2-2	—
Jovan Jester Jr.	17	3	3	1	2	0	4	1-4	0-0	1-2	—
Harrison Carrington	16	4	3	0	1	0	0	1-3	0-0	2-2	—
Elijah Chol	6	0	2	0	0	1	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Nes Emeneke	3	0	1	0	0	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		64	33	9	9	6	13	22-61	5-11	15-17

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

HAWUCI

40.9%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 27-66, home 22-61.

36.1%

30.8%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 8-26, home 5-11.

45.5%

60.0%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 9-15, home 15-17.

88.2%

43

Rebounds

39

17

Offensive rebounds

13

17

Assists

9

14

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

15

7

Steals

9

10

Blocks

6

34

Points in the paint

24

7

Fast-break points

12

13

Fouls?Fewer is better.

15

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

HAW offensevsUCI defense

HAW offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · UCI defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

52.0%

#144

45.4%

Stronger#6

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.7%

#314

15.8%

Stronger#95

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.4%

#142Stronger

31.5%

#229

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.3%

#27

19.0%

slight#18

UCI offensevsHAW defense

UCI offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · HAW defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.7%

#253

46.4%

Stronger#13

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.6%

#260

15.2%

Stronger#130

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.1%

#157

25.0%

Stronger#10

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.9%

#203

25.1%

slight#160

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

HAWUCI

+11.7 42ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions76th +7.2

109.3 178thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions272nd 104.9

97.6 7thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)9th 97.8

72.0 19thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)48th 70.8

Expected pace: about 71 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  HAW offensive rebounding

  HAW offense 31.4% (142nd) vs UCI defense allowing 31.5% (229th)
  +87 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

HAW

UCR

LBSU

CSUF

UCI

Back-to-back: 2nd night

TFSSMTWTFGame

UCI

CP

UCD

CSUN

HAW

Back-to-back: 2nd night5th straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

HAW · last 10

22-8 · back-to-back

• Mar 13 vs CSUFW 78–63
• Mar 7 vs LBSUL 75–84
• Mar 5 vs UCRW 93–74
• Feb 28 @ CSUFW 87–85
• Feb 26 @ UCDW 77–73
• Feb 21 vs UCSBW 78–75
• Feb 19 vs CPL 75–86
• Feb 14 @ CSUNL 60–84
• Feb 12 @ CSUBW 89–74
• Feb 7 vs UCSDW 72–67

7-3 in these

UCI · last 10

21-11 · back-to-back

• Mar 13 vs CSUNW 93–78
• Mar 7 vs UCDW 79–69
• Mar 5 vs CPW 107–85
• Feb 28 vs UCSBW 64–60
• Feb 26 @ CSUNW 68–67
• Feb 21 vs UCSDL 69–71
• Feb 19 @ LBSUW 69–58
• Feb 14 vs CSUFW 86–65
• Feb 12 @ CPL 73–79
• Feb 7 @ UCSBL 79–84

7-3 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.