UC Irvine vs Hawai'i — College Basketball, Jan 10, 2026

Hawai'i beat UC Irvine 67–66 at home on Jan 10, 2026.

FinalSat, Jan 10Conference game

UC Irvine Anteaters

21-11 · 9-5 on the road

66

Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors

22-8 · 15-3 at home

67

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
UCI	27	39	66
HAW	29	38	67

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

UC Irvine Anteaters

• Derin SaranG

  22 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
  10-21 FG
• Kyle EvansF

  13 pts · 8 reb · 1 ast · 5 blk
  6-10 FG
• Jovan Jester Jr.G

  9 pts · 5 reb
  3-8 FG

  1-2 3PT

Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors

• Isaac JohnsonC

  15 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
  5-10 FG

  2-6 3PT
• Harry RouhliadeffF

  14 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
  6-13 FG

  2-6 3PT
• Aaron Hunkin-ClaytorG

  12 pts · 5 reb · 6 ast
  5-7 FG

  0-1 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

UCI	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Derin Saran	31	22	3	2	1	0	5	10-21	0-0	2-2	—
Kyle Evans	29	13	8	1	2	5	2	6-10	0-0	1-1	—
Elijah Chol	27	5	8	0	0	3	0	2-7	0-2	1-2	—
Jurian Dixon	26	6	2	2	3	0	3	2-6	1-2	1-2	—
Tama Isaac	23	2	2	1	2	0	4	0-6	0-1	2-2	—
Andre Henry	25	3	5	0	0	0	0	1-4	0-1	1-2	—
Jovan Jester Jr.	15	9	5	0	0	1	0	3-8	1-2	2-2	—
Harrison Carrington	14	6	4	0	1	0	1	2-3	0-0	2-2	—
Nes Emeneke	7	0	3	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-0	0-0	—
Akiva McBirney-Griffin	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		66	40	6	9	9	15	26-67	2-8	12-15

HAW	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Aaron Hunkin-Claytor	36	12	5	6	2	0	3	5-7	0-1	2-2	—
Hunter Erickson	35	7	5	4	1	3	1	3-10	1-4	0-1	—
Harry Rouhliadeff	34	14	2	2	1	1	2	6-13	2-6	0-0	—
Dre Bullock	23	4	0	0	1	2	2	2-11	0-3	0-0	—
Isaac Johnson	13	15	5	1	0	2	3	5-10	2-6	3-3	—
Gytis Nemeiksa	28	7	5	1	2	3	1	2-6	0-1	3-4	—
Isaac Finlinson	14	3	4	1	0	0	0	1-2	0-0	1-3	—
Isaiah Kerr	12	3	2	0	0	0	0	1-3	1-3	0-0	—
Yacine Toumi	5	2	1	0	0	0	1	1-2	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		67	29	15	7	11	13	26-64	6-24	9-13

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

UCIHAW

38.8%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 26-67, home 26-64.

40.6%

25.0%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 2-8, home 6-24.

25.0%

80.0%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 12-15, home 9-13.

69.2%

44

Rebounds

36

18

Offensive rebounds

13

6

Assists

15

15

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

14

9

Steals

7

9

Blocks

11

42

Points in the paint

36

5

Fast-break points

8

15

Fouls?Fewer is better.

15

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

UCI offensevsHAW defense

UCI offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · HAW defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.7%

#253

46.4%

Stronger#13

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.6%

#260

15.2%

Stronger#130

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.1%

#157

25.0%

Stronger#10

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.9%

#203

25.1%

slight#160

HAW offensevsUCI defense

HAW offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · UCI defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

52.0%

#144

45.4%

Stronger#6

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.7%

#314

15.8%

Stronger#95

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.4%

#142Stronger

31.5%

#229

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.3%

#27

19.0%

slight#18

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

UCIHAW

+7.2 76thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions42nd +11.7

104.9 272ndOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions178th 109.3

97.8 9thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)7th 97.6

70.8 48thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)19th 72.0

Expected pace: about 71 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  HAW offensive rebounding

  HAW offense 31.4% (142nd) vs UCI defense allowing 31.5% (229th)
  +87 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

UCI

CSUB

CSUF

LBSU

HAW

1 day rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

HAW

UCR

UCSD

UCI

6 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

UCI · last 10

21-11 · 1 day rest

• Jan 8 vs LBSUW 74–64
• Jan 3 @ CSUFW 86–64
• Jan 1 @ CSUBW 81–77
• Dec 22 @ NORFW 89–70
• Dec 21 @ NDSUW 74–73
• Dec 19 vs BELL 58–84
• Dec 6 vs CSUNW 85–71
• Dec 4 vs UCRW 73–60
• Nov 30 @ SJSUW 72–63
• Nov 26 vs SDSTW 64–52

9-1 in these

HAW · last 10

22-8 · 6 days rest

• Jan 3 @ UCSDL 73–83
• Jan 1 @ UCRW 88–45
• Dec 13 vs UTEPW 66–61
• Dec 6 vs CSUFW 69–59
• Dec 4 vs UCDW 75–69
• Nov 28 vs UNDW 92–55
• Nov 20 vs ASUL 76–83
• Nov 15 vs UTUW 68–62
• Nov 14 vs MANW 86–56
• Nov 12 vs MVSUW 88–56

8-2 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.