Stonehill vs Le Moyne — College Basketball, Mar 4, 2026

Stonehill beat Le Moyne 81–71 at Le Moyne on Mar 4, 2026.

FinalWed, Mar 4Conference game

Stonehill Skyhawks

9-20 · 4-14 on the road

81

Le Moyne Dolphins

12-17 · 8-4 at home

71

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
STO	39	42	81
LEM	32	39	71

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Stonehill Skyhawks

• Davante HackettG

  26 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  8-18 FG

  4-11 3PT
• Ethan MeuserF

  20 pts · 5 reb · 2 ast
  5-11 FG

  4-9 3PT
• Hermann KoffiG

  13 pts · 8 reb · 3 ast
  5-11 FG

  3-7 3PT

Le Moyne Dolphins

• Tennessee RainwaterG

  15 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  5-9 FG

  3-5 3PT
• Shilo JacksonF

  14 pts · 10 reb · 1 ast · Double-double
  4-12 FG
• Jakai SandersG

  14 pts · 5 reb · 5 ast
  4-10 FG

  2-5 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

STO	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Hermann Koffi	38	13	8	3	1	0	1	5-11	3-7	0-0	—
Rex Sunderland	36	6	5	7	3	0	1	2-6	2-4	0-0	—
Davante Hackett	34	26	2	1	2	1	0	8-18	4-11	6-6	—
Ethan Meuser	30	20	5	2	2	1	1	5-11	4-9	6-8	—
Chas Stinson	27	7	7	1	0	0	4	3-6	1-2	0-0	—
Ridvan Tutic	15	4	6	2	1	1	1	2-3	0-0	0-2	—
Anthony Holden	12	5	2	0	0	0	0	2-5	1-4	0-0	—
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-1	0-0	—
Trenton Ruth	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-1	0-0	—
Totals		81	37	16	9	3	8	27-64	15-39	12-16

LEM	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Shilo Jackson	36	14	10	1	0	2	3	4-12	0-0	6-7	—
Jakai Sanders	34	14	5	5	2	0	3	4-10	2-5	4-6	—
Deng Garang	33	9	10	0	0	0	0	3-4	1-1	2-2	—
Trent Mosquera	33	7	9	1	0	1	3	3-17	1-9	0-0	—
Tennessee Rainwater	21	15	3	1	1	0	2	5-9	3-5	2-3	—
Samuel Hincapie	26	7	6	1	0	1	0	3-8	0-4	1-2	—
Jakob Blakley	10	5	1	1	0	0	0	2-4	1-3	0-0	—
Eli Greenberg	7	0	0	1	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		71	44	11	3	4	11	24-64	8-27	15-20

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

STOLEM

42.2%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 27-64, home 24-64.

37.5%

38.5%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 15-39, home 8-27.

29.6%

75.0%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 12-16, home 15-20.

75.0%

39

Rebounds

44

9

Offensive rebounds

14

16

Assists

11

8

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

11

9

Steals

3

3

Blocks

4

16

Points in the paint

30

10

Fast-break points

6

15

Fouls?Fewer is better.

16

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

STO offensevsLEM defense

STO offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · LEM defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.0%

#347

49.5%

Stronger#78

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#326

13.0%

slight#294

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#282

29.1%

Stronger#114

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.2%

#357

24.2%

Stronger#133

LEM offensevsSTO defense

LEM offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · STO defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.7%

#167

48.0%

Stronger#40

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#324slight

11.8%

#343

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.8%

#338

27.2%

Stronger#44

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

28.3%

#88

20.4%

slight#37

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

STOLEM

−9.7 302ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions230th −3.9

94.2 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions279th 104.6

103.9 59thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)146th 108.5

66.9 243rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)172nd 68.3

Expected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  LEM turnovers

  LEM offense 16.9% (324th) vs STO defense allowing 11.8% (343rd)
  +19 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

MTWTFSSMTGame

STO

MERC

LEM

3 days rest

MTWTFSSMTGame

LEM

FDU

NHVN

STO

3 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

STO · last 10

9-20 · 3 days rest

• Feb 28 vs MERCL 72–75
• Feb 21 vs LEMW 77–68
• Feb 19 @ NHVNL 51–64
• Feb 14 vs WAGL 57–68
• Feb 12 @ CHSTL 55–68
• Feb 7 @ LIUL 54–61
• Feb 5 @ FDUL 58–74
• Jan 31 @ LEMW 65–54
• Jan 29 vs FDUW 58–57
• Jan 26 vs CCSUW 61–59

4-6 in these

LEM · last 10

12-17 · 3 days rest

• Feb 28 @ NHVNL 59–66
• Feb 26 vs FDUW 76–59
• Feb 21 @ STOL 68–77
• Feb 19 @ CCSUL 77–78
• Feb 14 vs CHSTW 81–63
• Feb 12 vs MERCW 58–57
• Feb 5 @ WAGL 78–79
• Jan 31 vs STOL 54–65
• Jan 29 @ LIUL 61–83
• Jan 26 @ FDUW 87–74

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.