Stonehill vs Le Moyne — College Basketball, Jan 31, 2026

Stonehill beat Le Moyne 65–54 at Le Moyne on Jan 31, 2026.

FinalSat, Jan 31Conference game

Stonehill Skyhawks

9-20 · 4-14 on the road

65

Le Moyne Dolphins

12-17 · 8-4 at home

54

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
STO	32	33	65
LEM	28	26	54

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Stonehill Skyhawks

• Davante HackettG

  22 pts · 15 reb · 3 ast · Double-double
  8-18 FG

  3-8 3PT
• Hermann KoffiG

  15 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  5-12 FG

  0-6 3PT
• Ethan MeuserF

  13 pts · 11 reb · 1 ast · 3 blk · Double-double
  5-12 FG

  2-6 3PT

Le Moyne Dolphins

• Trent MosqueraG

  17 pts · 10 reb · 3 ast · 3 blk · Double-double
  7-18 FG

  2-10 3PT
• Samuel HincapieG

  10 pts · 4 reb
  3-4 FG

  1-1 3PT
• Isaac NyakundiF

  8 pts · 2 reb · 3 stl · 3 blk
  3-9 FG

  0-4 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

STO	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Hermann Koffi	37	15	2	1	1	0	1	5-12	0-6	5-6	—
Davante Hackett	35	22	15	3	1	0	1	8-18	3-8	3-4	—
Rex Sunderland	32	5	3	4	4	1	2	2-8	1-3	0-0	—
Chas Stinson	32	4	7	0	2	2	1	1-7	0-0	2-2	—
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	14	4	3	0	0	1	1	1-4	1-2	1-2	—
Ethan Meuser	32	13	11	1	1	3	0	5-12	2-6	1-2	—
Trenton Ruth	14	2	3	0	0	0	1	0-3	0-2	2-2	—
Pearse McGuinn	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Anthony Holden	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		65	44	9	9	7	7	22-64	7-27	14-18

LEM	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Trent Mosquera	36	17	10	3	2	3	3	7-18	2-10	1-2	—
Jakai Sanders	36	6	9	6	0	0	2	2-11	1-3	1-2	—
Isaac Nyakundi	29	8	2	0	3	3	1	3-9	0-4	2-4	—
Deng Garang	26	4	5	1	0	1	1	1-4	1-3	1-2	—
Jakob Blakley	13	2	1	0	0	0	1	1-2	0-0	0-0	—
Samuel Hincapie	26	10	4	0	0	0	1	3-4	1-1	3-3	—
Tennessee Rainwater	23	7	5	2	0	0	2	3-11	1-3	0-0	—
Eli Greenberg	11	0	0	0	0	0	1	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		54	36	12	5	7	12	20-60	6-24	8-13

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

STOLEM

34.4%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 22-64, home 20-60.

33.3%

25.9%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 7-27, home 6-24.

25.0%

77.8%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 14-18, home 8-13.

61.5%

47

Rebounds

40

10

Offensive rebounds

6

9

Assists

12

8

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

12

9

Steals

5

7

Blocks

7

28

Points in the paint

24

6

Fast-break points

8

13

Fouls?Fewer is better.

12

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

STO offensevsLEM defense

STO offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · LEM defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.0%

#347

49.5%

Stronger#78

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#326

13.0%

slight#294

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#282

29.1%

Stronger#114

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.2%

#357

24.2%

Stronger#133

LEM offensevsSTO defense

LEM offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · STO defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.7%

#167

48.0%

Stronger#40

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#324slight

11.8%

#343

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.8%

#338

27.2%

Stronger#44

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

28.3%

#88

20.4%

slight#37

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

STOLEM

−9.7 302ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions230th −3.9

94.2 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions279th 104.6

103.9 59thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)146th 108.5

66.9 243rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)172nd 68.3

Expected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  LEM turnovers

  LEM offense 16.9% (324th) vs STO defense allowing 11.8% (343rd)
  +19 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

STO

LIU

CCSU

FDU

LEM

1 day rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

LEM

WAG

FDU

LIU

STO

1 day rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

STO · last 10

9-20 · 1 day rest

• Jan 29 vs FDUW 58–57
• Jan 26 vs CCSUW 61–59
• Jan 23 vs LIUL 63–66
• Jan 17 @ MERCW 62–57
• Jan 10 vs CHSTW 85–82
• Jan 8 @ CCSUL 69–76
• Jan 4 @ WAGW 69–60
• Jan 2 vs NHVNL 55–70
• Dec 22 @ SYRL 48–77
• Dec 17 @ UNHL 58–59

5-5 in these

LEM · last 10

12-17 · 1 day rest

• Jan 29 @ LIUL 61–83
• Jan 26 @ FDUW 87–74
• Jan 23 vs WAGW 69–67
• Jan 19 vs LIUW 83–77
• Jan 17 @ CHSTW 72–57
• Jan 10 vs CCSUL 59–69
• Jan 8 vs NHVNW 73–47
• Jan 4 @ MERCL 60–74
• Dec 28 @ BCL 64–72
• Dec 20 @ SBUL 81–92

5-5 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.