Seattle U vs Loyola Marymount — College Basketball, Feb 28, 2026

Seattle U beat Loyola Marymount 71–66 at Loyola Marymount on Feb 28, 2026.

FinalSat, Feb 28Conference game

Seattle U Redhawks

18-13 · 5-9 on the road

71

Loyola Marymount Lions

14-17 · 9-10 at home

66

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
SEA	29	42	71
LMU	32	34	66

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Seattle U Redhawks

• Brayden MaldonadoG

  33 pts · 5 reb · 4 ast
  9-17 FG

  6-11 3PT
• Will HeimbrodtF

  11 pts · 3 reb · 3 ast · 3 blk
  5-8 FG
• Austin MaurerC

  9 pts · 4 reb
  4-8 FG

  0-3 3PT

Loyola Marymount Lions

• Aaron McBrideF

  21 pts · 7 reb
  8-16 FG

  2-4 3PT
• Jan VideG

  19 pts · 4 reb · 5 ast
  7-14 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Rodney Brown Jr.G

  14 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
  5-8 FG

  4-7 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

SEA	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Will Heimbrodt	36	11	3	3	0	3	2	5-8	0-0	1-4	—
Brayden Maldonado	33	33	5	4	1	0	1	9-17	6-11	9-12	—
Maleek Arington	32	3	3	1	3	0	1	0-3	0-1	3-4	—
Jojo Murphy	31	5	3	0	0	0	0	2-7	1-3	0-2	—
Austin Maurer	26	9	4	0	1	1	1	4-8	0-3	1-1	—
John Christofilis	16	8	4	0	0	0	0	3-6	2-5	0-0	—
Houran Dan	14	1	2	2	0	0	0	0-2	0-0	1-2	—
Miles Amos	12	1	1	0	1	0	0	0-0	0-0	1-2	—
Totals		71	25	10	6	4	5	23-51	9-23	16-27

LMU	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Myron Amey Jr.	39	2	2	4	0	0	2	0-3	0-1	2-2	—
Rodney Brown Jr.	37	14	2	2	0	0	1	5-8	4-7	0-0	—
Aaron McBride	36	21	7	0	0	1	1	8-16	2-4	3-4	—
Jan Vide	32	19	4	5	2	0	4	7-14	0-1	5-7	—
Rokas Jocius	7	3	2	0	0	0	0	1-2	0-0	1-1	—
Rick Issanza	23	0	10	0	0	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-1	—
Josh Dalton	14	2	3	0	0	0	2	0-0	0-0	2-2	—
AJ Thomas	8	2	1	0	0	0	0	1-3	0-1	0-0	—
Nakyel Shelton	4	3	0	0	0	0	1	1-1	1-1	0-0	—
Totals		66	31	11	2	4	11	23-47	7-15	13-17

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

SEALMU

45.1%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 23-51, home 23-47.

48.9%

39.1%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 9-23, home 7-15.

46.7%

59.3%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 16-27, home 13-17.

76.5%

27

Rebounds

32

7

Offensive rebounds

5

10

Assists

11

6

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

13

6

Steals

2

4

Blocks

4

22

Points in the paint

28

5

Fast-break points

6

16

Fouls?Fewer is better.

23

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

SEA offensevsLMU defense

SEA offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · LMU defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.4%

#271

48.9%

Stronger#62

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.2%

#232

14.4%

slight#188

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.6%

#341

32.0%

Stronger#252

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.3%

#217

24.3%

Stronger#139

LMU offensevsSEA defense

LMU offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · SEA defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.8%

#150

48.3%

Stronger#46

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.5%

#258

18.5%

Stronger#12

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

26.7%

#302

31.8%

slight#244

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.6%

#301

24.4%

Stronger#141

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

SEALMU

+2.5 133rdNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions187th −0.6

102.1 310thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions255th 105.8

99.6 18thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)98th 106.4

68.2 177thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)176th 68.3

Expected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

No pairing is lopsided: each unit meets one ranked within a few spots of it.

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

SEA

PORT

PEPP

LMU

2 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

LMU

USD

WSU

SEA

2 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

SEA · last 10

18-13 · 2 days rest

• Feb 25 @ PEPPW 87–80
• Feb 21 vs PORTW 71–59
• Feb 18 vs SMCL 70–72
• Feb 15 vs ORSTW 60–50
• Feb 11 @ SCUL 72–84
• Feb 7 @ PORTL 53–54
• Feb 4 vs PEPPW 83–81
• Jan 28 @ WSUL 58–70
• Jan 24 @ PACL 54–56
• Jan 21 vs LMUW 69–59

5-5 in these

LMU · last 10

14-17 · 2 days rest

• Feb 25 vs WSUW 67–66
• Feb 21 @ USDW 77–65
• Feb 14 @ PEPPL 89–90
• Feb 11 @ PACL 59–65
• Feb 7 vs USDW 83–63
• Feb 4 @ SFW 84–75
• Jan 31 vs SCUL 73–104
• Jan 28 vs ORSTL 69–72
• Jan 21 @ SEAL 59–69
• Jan 17 vs PORTL 58–71

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.