Loyola Marymount vs Seattle U — College Basketball, Jan 21, 2026

Seattle U beat Loyola Marymount 69–59 at home on Jan 21, 2026.

FinalWed, Jan 21Conference game

Loyola Marymount Lions

14-17 · 5-7 on the road

59

Seattle U Redhawks

18-13 · 13-4 at home

69

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
LMU	18	41	59
SEA	35	34	69

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Loyola Marymount Lions

• Myron Amey Jr.G

  18 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  6-11 FG

  3-7 3PT
• Jalen ShelleyF

  13 pts · 9 reb · 2 ast
  5-10 FG

  1-4 3PT
• Rodney Brown Jr.G

  11 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  4-10 FG

  2-7 3PT

Seattle U Redhawks

• Brayden MaldonadoG

  14 pts · 5 reb · 2 ast
  6-15 FG

  2-6 3PT
• Jojo MurphyG

  13 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
  4-10 FG

  2-5 3PT
• Austin MaurerC

  11 pts · 5 reb
  3-5 FG

  0-1 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

LMU	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Myron Amey Jr.	31	18	3	1	1	0	4	6-11	3-7	3-5	—
Jalen Shelley	31	13	9	2	1	0	3	5-10	1-4	2-2	—
Rick Issanza	22	4	2	1	4	3	1	2-3	0-0	0-0	—
Jan Vide	19	1	3	2	0	0	7	0-1	0-0	1-2	—
Jael Martin	7	0	2	1	0	0	0	0-2	0-1	0-0	—
Rodney Brown Jr.	30	11	2	1	0	0	1	4-10	2-7	1-1	—
AJ Thomas	19	3	2	4	0	0	3	1-4	0-0	1-4	—
Josh Dalton	16	3	4	2	0	0	0	1-2	1-1	0-0	—
Nakyel Shelton	15	4	3	0	0	0	1	1-3	0-1	2-2	—
Rokas Jocius	10	2	2	0	0	0	0	1-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		59	32	14	6	3	20	21-47	7-21	10-16

SEA	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Brayden Maldonado	35	14	5	2	2	0	1	6-15	2-6	0-0	—
Junseok Yeo	33	9	4	3	1	0	2	3-10	1-4	2-2	—
Maleek Arington	31	2	3	2	4	0	2	0-4	0-2	2-2	—
Will Heimbrodt	27	10	7	2	5	1	1	5-10	0-0	0-0	—
Austin Maurer	21	11	5	0	0	0	0	3-5	0-1	5-7	—
Jojo Murphy	17	13	4	1	0	0	0	4-10	2-5	3-4	—
John Christofilis	16	2	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	2-2	—
Houran Dan	10	4	0	0	0	0	0	2-3	0-0	0-0	—
Brock Felder	7	4	2	0	0	0	0	2-3	0-1	0-0	—
Miles Amos	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		69	30	10	12	1	6	25-61	5-20	14-17

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

LMUSEA

44.7%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 21-47, home 25-61.

41.0%

33.3%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 7-21, home 5-20.

25.0%

62.5%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 10-16, home 14-17.

82.4%

34

Rebounds

31

5

Offensive rebounds

8

14

Assists

10

20

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

7

6

Steals

12

3

Blocks

1

22

Points in the paint

36

14

Fast-break points

6

16

Fouls?Fewer is better.

18

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

LMU offensevsSEA defense

LMU offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · SEA defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.8%

#150

48.3%

Stronger#46

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.5%

#258

18.5%

Stronger#12

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

26.7%

#302

31.8%

slight#244

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.6%

#301

24.4%

Stronger#141

SEA offensevsLMU defense

SEA offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · LMU defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.4%

#271

48.9%

Stronger#62

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.2%

#232

14.4%

slight#188

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.6%

#341

32.0%

Stronger#252

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.3%

#217

24.3%

Stronger#139

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

LMUSEA

−0.6 187thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions133rd +2.5

105.8 255thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions310th 102.1

106.4 98thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)18th 99.6

68.3 176thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)177th 68.2

Expected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

No pairing is lopsided: each unit meets one ranked within a few spots of it.

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

MTWTFSSMTGame

LMU

ORST

PORT

SEA

3 days rest

MTWTFSSMTGame

SEA

USD

GONZ

LMU

3 days rest3rd straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

LMU · last 10

14-17 · 3 days rest

• Jan 17 vs PORTL 58–71
• Jan 14 @ ORSTL 70–76
• Jan 10 @ SCUL 72–103
• Jan 8 vs SFW 84–82
• Jan 4 @ GONZL 47–82
• Jan 2 @ WSUL 76–78
• Dec 30 vs PACW 80–71
• Dec 28 vs SMCL 73–78
• Dec 23 vs MORGW 83–56
• Dec 19 vs UNAW 91–57

4-6 in these

SEA · last 10

18-13 · 3 days rest

• Jan 17 vs GONZL 50–71
• Jan 15 vs USDW 75–64
• Jan 8 @ ORSTL 55–68
• Jan 4 @ SMCL 76–93
• Jan 2 @ GONZL 72–80
• Dec 30 vs WSUW 69–55
• Dec 28 vs SFL 59–67
• Dec 22 @ UTSAW 71–68
• Dec 19 vs WASHW 70–66
• Dec 17 @ UCDW 79–78

5-5 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.