Portland vs Seattle U — College Basketball, Feb 21, 2026

Seattle U beat Portland 71–59 at home on Feb 21, 2026.

FinalSat, Feb 21Conference game

Portland Pilots

13-19 · 2-13 on the road

59

Seattle U Redhawks

18-13 · 13-4 at home

71

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
PORT	20	39	59
SEA	29	42	71

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Portland Pilots

• Joel FoxwellG

  20 pts · 3 reb · 3 ast · 3 stl
  5-12 FG

  4-8 3PT
• James O'DonnellF

  14 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  3-3 FG
• Jermaine Ballisager WebbC

  10 pts · 7 reb
  3-7 FG

  0-2 3PT

Seattle U Redhawks

• Austin MaurerC

  14 pts · 5 reb
  5-6 FG

  2-2 3PT
• John ChristofilisG

  14 pts · 2 reb
  5-14 FG

  4-9 3PT
• Jojo MurphyG

  11 pts · 7 reb · 4 ast · 4 stl
  4-11 FG

  1-4 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

PORT	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Joel Foxwell	39	20	3	3	3	0	4	5-12	4-8	6-6	—
Garrett Nuckolls	33	10	3	2	0	0	4	3-10	0-3	4-4	—
James O'Donnell	29	14	2	1	1	1	4	3-3	0-0	8-8	—
Dante Censori-Hercules	28	2	4	0	3	0	0	0-1	0-1	2-6	—
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	24	10	7	0	1	1	4	3-7	0-2	4-5	—
NaVaughn Long	16	0	2	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Mikah Ballew	15	3	1	0	0	0	1	1-5	1-4	0-0	—
Matúš Hronský	8	0	3	1	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Kelson Gebbers	7	0	0	0	0	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Sam Noland	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		59	25	7	8	2	18	15-40	5-19	24-29

SEA	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Jojo Murphy	38	11	7	4	4	0	2	4-11	1-4	2-2	—
John Christofilis	27	14	2	0	1	0	0	5-14	4-9	0-0	—
Maleek Arington	24	6	2	6	2	0	0	1-5	1-4	3-4	—
Junseok Yeo	24	5	2	0	0	0	5	2-8	1-6	0-0	—
Austin Maurer	19	14	5	0	0	0	1	5-6	2-2	2-2	—
Will Heimbrodt	27	11	8	2	2	2	1	1-8	0-2	9-12	—
Houran Dan	22	7	0	0	1	0	0	3-4	0-0	1-2	—
Miles Amos	16	3	2	0	2	0	0	1-2	1-1	0-0	—
Ray Adams	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Yuto Kawashima	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Stratos Papastavrou	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		71	28	12	12	2	9	22-58	10-28	17-22

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

PORTSEA

37.5%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 15-40, home 22-58.

37.9%

26.3%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 5-19, home 10-28.

35.7%

82.8%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 24-29, home 17-22.

77.3%

29

Rebounds

33

4

Offensive rebounds

10

7

Assists

12

19

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

10

8

Steals

12

2

Blocks

2

14

Points in the paint

18

6

Fast-break points

9

20

Fouls?Fewer is better.

19

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

PORT offensevsSEA defense

PORT offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · SEA defense in 4 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.2%

#185

48.3%

Stronger#46

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

17.6%

#342

18.5%

Stronger#12

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

28.1%

#262

31.8%

slight#244

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

25.5%

#182

24.4%

slight#141

SEA offensevsPORT defense

SEA offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · PORT defense in 4 (1 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.4%

#271

52.7%

slight#250

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.2%

#232

14.8%

slight#161

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.6%

#341

32.5%

slight#283

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.3%

#217

24.2%

Stronger#134

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

PORTSEA

−8.7 291stNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions133rd +2.5

103.6 294thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions310th 102.1

112.3 244thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)18th 99.6

69.5 100thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)177th 68.2

Expected pace: about 69 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  SEA 3-point shooting

  SEA offense 32.6% (244th) vs PORT defense allowing 36.1% (307th)
  +63 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

PORT

PEPP

SEA

2 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

SEA

ORST

SMC

PORT

2 days rest3rd straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

PORT · last 10

13-19 · 2 days rest

• Feb 18 vs PEPPL 87–95
• Feb 11 @ USDL 58–71
• Feb 7 vs SEAW 54–53
• Feb 4 vs GONZW 87–80
• Jan 31 @ WSUL 74–104
• Jan 28 @ PACL 51–74
• Jan 24 vs SMCL 69–75
• Jan 17 @ LMUW 71–58
• Jan 14 @ PEPPL 63–67
• Jan 10 vs ORSTW 82–76

4-6 in these

SEA · last 10

18-13 · 2 days rest

• Feb 18 vs SMCL 70–72
• Feb 15 vs ORSTW 60–50
• Feb 11 @ SCUL 72–84
• Feb 7 @ PORTL 53–54
• Feb 4 vs PEPPW 83–81
• Jan 28 @ WSUL 58–70
• Jan 24 @ PACL 54–56
• Jan 21 vs LMUW 69–59
• Jan 17 vs GONZL 50–71
• Jan 15 vs USDW 75–64

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.