Seattle U vs Portland — College Basketball, Feb 7, 2026

Portland beat Seattle U 54–53 at home on Feb 7, 2026.

FinalSat, Feb 7Conference game

Seattle U Redhawks

18-13 · 5-9 on the road

53

Portland Pilots

13-19 · 11-6 at home

54

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
SEA	27	26	53
PORT	19	35	54

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Seattle U Redhawks

• Junseok YeoF

  14 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
  5-14 FG

  2-8 3PT
• John ChristofilisG

  13 pts · 1 reb · 1 ast
  4-9 FG

  2-5 3PT
• Maleek AringtonG

  9 pts · 4 reb · 3 ast · 3 stl
  3-7 FG

  2-5 3PT

Portland Pilots

• James O'DonnellF

  13 pts · 1 ast
  5-7 FG
• Jermaine Ballisager WebbC

  12 pts · 6 reb
  4-9 FG

  3-4 3PT
• Cameron WilliamsF

  10 pts · 4 reb
  5-8 FG

Box score◷History

every player+

SEA	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Brayden Maldonado	36	8	5	4	1	0	2	3-9	2-7	0-0	—
Maleek Arington	34	9	4	3	3	0	1	3-7	2-5	1-2	—
Junseok Yeo	33	14	4	1	2	1	2	5-14	2-8	2-2	—
Will Heimbrodt	30	2	4	2	0	4	6	0-6	0-3	2-4	—
Austin Maurer	19	2	4	1	1	2	1	1-2	0-1	0-0	—
Houran Dan	22	2	3	1	0	0	1	1-4	0-0	0-0	—
John Christofilis	18	13	1	1	0	0	0	4-9	2-5	3-3	—
Jojo Murphy	7	3	4	0	0	0	0	1-1	0-0	1-2	—
Brock Felder	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		53	29	13	7	7	13	18-52	8-29	9-13

PORT	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Joel Foxwell	36	5	8	9	2	0	4	2-11	1-6	0-0	—
Jermaine Ballisager Webb	35	12	6	0	1	0	2	4-9	3-4	1-1	—
Dante Censori-Hercules	32	8	7	0	2	0	0	3-9	0-1	2-2	—
Garrett Nuckolls	30	4	5	4	3	1	1	2-9	0-4	0-0	—
Cameron Williams	24	10	4	0	0	0	1	5-8	0-0	0-0	—
James O'Donnell	21	13	0	1	2	0	3	5-7	0-0	3-5	—
NaVaughn Long	10	0	2	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Matúš Hronský	8	2	0	0	0	1	1	0-3	0-1	2-2	—
Sam Noland	4	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		54	32	14	10	2	12	21-57	4-17	8-10

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

SEAPORT

34.6%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 18-52, home 21-57.

36.8%

27.6%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 8-29, home 4-17.

23.5%

69.2%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 9-13, home 8-10.

80.0%

33

Rebounds

34

10

Offensive rebounds

12

13

Assists

14

15

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

12

7

Steals

10

7

Blocks

2

18

Points in the paint

34

8

Fast-break points

4

15

Fouls?Fewer is better.

11

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

SEA offensevsPORT defense

SEA offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · PORT defense in 4 (1 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.4%

#271

52.7%

slight#250

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.2%

#232

14.8%

slight#161

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.6%

#341

32.5%

slight#283

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

24.3%

#217

24.2%

Stronger#134

PORT offensevsSEA defense

PORT offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · SEA defense in 4 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.2%

#185

48.3%

Stronger#46

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

17.6%

#342

18.5%

Stronger#12

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

28.1%

#262

31.8%

slight#244

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

25.5%

#182

24.4%

slight#141

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

SEAPORT

+2.5 133rdNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions291st −8.7

102.1 310thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions294th 103.6

99.6 18thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)244th 112.3

68.2 177thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)100th 69.5

Expected pace: about 69 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  SEA 3-point shooting

  SEA offense 32.6% (244th) vs PORT defense allowing 36.1% (307th)
  +63 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

SEA

PEPP

PORT

2 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

PORT

WSU

GONZ

SEA

2 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

SEA · last 10

18-13 · 2 days rest

• Feb 4 vs PEPPW 83–81
• Jan 28 @ WSUL 58–70
• Jan 24 @ PACL 54–56
• Jan 21 vs LMUW 69–59
• Jan 17 vs GONZL 50–71
• Jan 15 vs USDW 75–64
• Jan 8 @ ORSTL 55–68
• Jan 4 @ SMCL 76–93
• Jan 2 @ GONZL 72–80
• Dec 30 vs WSUW 69–55

4-6 in these

PORT · last 10

13-19 · 2 days rest

• Feb 4 vs GONZW 87–80
• Jan 31 @ WSUL 74–104
• Jan 28 @ PACL 51–74
• Jan 24 vs SMCL 69–75
• Jan 17 @ LMUW 71–58
• Jan 14 @ PEPPL 63–67
• Jan 10 vs ORSTW 82–76
• Jan 8 vs PACW 90–89
• Jan 4 @ SFL 68–73
• Jan 2 @ SMCL 57–78

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.