Probetrics — Sports Analytics
← WNBA
Premium

The model's read on Las Vegas Aces at Phoenix Mercury

The numbers above are the market's. Premium adds the model's call on this game.

  • ✓Who the model picks, and how sure it is
  • ✓Spread and total leans against the market
  • ✓The matchups behind the call, in plain English
Premium

Player props

No lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number

A'ja Wilson
A'ja Wilson
LV vs PHX
Player page →
No line posted
Showing the games against 26.5
Hit rate
60.0% [6/10]
90% range 35–81%
PTS
25.1
-0.9
REB
8.3
-1.0
AST
3.4
+0.2
3PM
0.7
-0.2
MIN
31.6
-0.3

Averages over the games shown; the small number is the difference from the season average.

Closing lines fill in game by game from our first props pull (Sep 23, 2026); none of these games has one yet.

Aug 11 vs WSH: 26 (line 26.5)26WSHAug 11Aug 13 vs WSH: 15 (line 26.5)15WSHAug 13Aug 15 vs MIN: 32 (line 26.5)32MINAug 15Aug 18 vs ATL: 27 (line 26.5)27ATLAug 18Aug 20 vs CON: 20 (line 26.5)20CONAug 20Aug 23 @ TOR: 27 (line 26.5)27@TORAug 23Aug 28 vs TOR: 27 (line 26.5)27TORAug 28Sep 17 @ SEA: 29 (line 26.5)29@SEASep 17Sep 20 vs SEA: 30 (line 26.5)30SEASep 20Sep 22 vs LA: 18 (line 26.5)18LASep 2226.5
What if the line were26.5 (6-4)

Shot types vs PHX

2026, 41 games

TypePointsFGAFG%PHX allows
Free throws6.8 (26%)——14.9 #12
Spot-up jumpers5.0 (19%)4.645%21.0 #1
Transition3.0 (12%)2.267%10.5 #11
Post-ups & turnarounds3.0 (11%)2.853%3.7 #5
Pull-ups & step-backs2.6 (10%)3.044%10.7 #5
Drives & floaters2.6 (10%)2.453%12.4 #13
Putbacks1.7 (6%)1.265%5.3 #10
Other at the rim0.8 (3%)0.662%2.7 #9
Cuts & lobs0.7 (3%)0.568%5.7 #7

PHX allows = points a game its opponents score that way; rank 1 = allows the most. Transition = first shot within 7s of a stop or score; putback = within 3s of an own offensive rebound; the rest by the shot label.

Shooting zones

A'ja Wilson · 1621 attempts, last two seasons

72%29148%91842%14140%1046%9642%1242%1941%134
Restricted area: 209/291 (72%)
Paint (non-RA): 444/918 (48%)
Left mid-range: 59/141 (42%)
Center mid-range: 4/10 (40%)
Right mid-range: 44/96 (46%)
Left corner 3: 5/12 (42%)
Right corner 3: 8/19 (42%)
Above the break 3: 55/134 (41%)

Where they shoot from and how often it goes in, by zone. From charted shot locations. Descriptive history, not a forecast.

Similar players vs PHX

Similarity from 2026 box scores

Avg diff
-1.00
Avg diff %
-4%
Went over
45% (13/29)
DatePlayerVsResultDiff
Aug 29Isabelle Harrison TOR12.3 avg16+31%
Aug 27Shakira Austin WSH16.9 avg11-35%
Aug 25Shakira Austin WSH17.0 avg16-6%
Aug 22Angel Reese ATL15.9 avg31+95%
Aug 11Dearica Hamby LA15.1 avg19+26%
Aug 9Shakira Austin WSH16.1 avg19+18%
Aug 7Brittney Griner CON14.1 avg5-65%
Aug 5Angel Reese ATL16.1 avg14-13%
Aug 3Kamilla Cardoso CHI14.3 avg16+12%
Aug 1Breanna Stewart NY21.7 avg14-35%
1 / 3

Compared with: Breanna Stewart, Shakira Austin, Dominique Malonga, Aliyah Boston, Angel Reese, Kamilla Cardoso, Natasha Howard, Brittney Griner, Isabelle Harrison, Dearica Hamby, Brittney Sykes, Nyara Sabally.

Players whose minutes and per-36 scoring, rebounding, playmaking, three-point and free-throw volume, steals, blocks and turnovers are closest to this player's. Each game is measured against its closing line (CLOSE) where we have one, otherwise against that player's own average in the same season before that game (AVG). Other players' history, not a projection for this one.

At a glance
LVPHX
31-14Record16-28
8-2Last 104-6
+6.5#4Net rating-3.9#9
110.5#2Offense102.5#11
104.0#6Defense106.5#12
82.7#10Pace82.3#13
54.8#2eFG%50.5#9
50.7#6Opp eFG%53.5#13
13.6#3Turnover %15.3#8
23.3#12Off. rebound %21.0#15

Per 100 possessions; rank 1 = best (for Defense and Opp eFG%, the lowest).

The shape of the matchup

Effective field-goal percentage (offense)ShootingTurnovers per 100 plays — fewer is better (offense)TurnoversShare of its own misses rebounded (offense)O-Reb%Free throws made per field-goal attempt (offense)FT rateEffective field-goal percentage allowed (defense)Shooting DTurnovers forced per 100 plays (defense)TakeawaysShare of opponent misses kept off the boards (defense)D-Reb%Free throws allowed per field-goal attempt — fewer is better (defense)FT def
LVPHX

Each axis is a percentile among 15 teams on that measure (1 = best), offense on the left half of the wheel, defense on the right. Bigger is better.

Ratings · 2026

+6.5 #4Net rating−3.9 #9
110.5 #2Offensive rating102.5 #11
104.0 #6Defensive rating106.5 #12
82.7 #10Pace82.3 #13
LVPHX

The four factors

LV offense vs PHX defenseLV OPHX D
Shooting (eFG%)54.8% #253.5% #13
Turnovers13.6% #315.2% #7
Offensive rebounding23.3% #1224.2% #5
Free throws (FTr)23.6% #822.0% #6
Rating110.5 #2106.5 #12
PHX offense vs LV defensePHX OLV D
Shooting (eFG%)50.5% #950.7% #6
Turnovers15.3% #814.9% #9
Offensive rebounding21.0% #1524.7% #7
Free throws (FTr)27.7% #221.9% #5
Rating102.5 #11104.0 #6

League rank among 15 teams (1 = best; a defense ranks well for allowing less shooting, more turnovers forced, fewer offensive rebounds and fewer free throws).

Shot types

2026 · points a game by shot type · rank 1 = the most in the league

LV offense vs PHX defense

TypeLV scoresPHX allows
Spot-up jumpers17.2 #921.0 #1
Free throws16.2 #814.9 #12
Drives & floaters10.7 #1512.4 #13
Transition12.9 #410.5 #11
Pull-ups & step-backsmatch13.2 #210.7 #5
Cuts & lobs5.5 #85.7 #7
Putbacks5.2 #95.3 #10
Post-ups & turnaroundsmatch5.9 #13.7 #5
Other at the rim3.3 #32.7 #9

PHX offense vs LV defense

TypePHX scoresLV allows
Spot-up jumpers17.2 #1116.2 #13
Free throws18.2 #415.3 #10
Drives & floaters13.7 #1114.2 #8
Transition11.2 #811.5 #8
Pull-ups & step-backs9.0 #911.2 #3
Cuts & lobs6.2 #64.5 #14
Putbacks4.0 #155.8 #6
Post-ups & turnarounds2.4 #143.3 #10
Other at the rim1.6 #143.1 #3

From play-by-play: transition = the first shot within 7 seconds of a defensive rebound, turnover or opponent score; putback = within 3 seconds of the team's own offensive rebound; the rest by the shot label (spot-up = the plain jump shot). Free throws from the box score. Hover a number for the league average. An approximation of play types, not tracking data.

Scoring by quarter and half

per game, last 17 games
LVPHXAvg team
ForAgainstForAgainst
Q123.820.220.923.222.1
Q222.921.221.423.421.4
Q321.820.921.620.121.8
Q422.622.422.822.321.7
1st half46.741.442.346.643.5
2nd half45.143.844.542.443.7
Game91.885.286.889.087.2
Points in the 1st half51%49%49%52%50%

Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.

LV rotation · last 15 games

PlayerMinPtsRebAst
Jackie Young32.322.94.66.7
A'ja Wilson32.125.18.73.3
Chelsea Gray31.810.43.05.4
NaLyssa Smith26.511.77.71.0
Jewell Loyd23.16.42.11.3
Mai Yamamoto16.35.81.31.6
Brianna Turner15.61.32.30.2
Stephanie Talbot14.94.12.10.7

PHX rotation · last 15 games

PlayerMinPtsRebAst
Kahleah Copper34.224.03.32.0
Alyssa Thomas32.914.59.28.8
DeWanna Bonner30.114.37.72.1
Noemie Brochant25.77.91.61.9
Kelsey Plum21.215.81.82.8
Natasha Mack20.28.55.10.8
Shay Ciezki19.210.42.22.2
Sami Whitcomb18.55.71.52.5

LV · last 10

31-14 · 1 day rest
  • Sep 22 vs LAW 89–79
  • Sep 20 vs SEAW 98–77
  • Sep 17 @ SEAW 114–77
  • Aug 28 vs TORW 93–73
  • Aug 23 @ TORW 88–78
  • Aug 20 vs CONW 101–78
  • Aug 18 vs ATLL 82–97
  • Aug 15 vs MINL 87–92
  • Aug 13 vs WSHW 83–76
  • Aug 11 vs WSHW 86–76
8-2 in these

PHX · last 10

16-28 · 2 days rest
  • Sep 21 vs DALW 87–86
  • Sep 19 @ DALL 82–87
  • Sep 17 @ PORW 94–91
  • Aug 29 vs TORW 101–69
  • Aug 27 vs WSHL 73–80
  • Aug 25 vs WSHL 84–94
  • Aug 22 vs ATLL 89–99
  • Aug 16 vs PORL 85–88
  • Aug 11 @ LAW 94–87
  • Aug 9 @ WSHL 75–95
4-6 in these

Recent meetings

  • Sep 24, 2026LV 100atPHX 82
  • Jul 11, 2026PHX 58atLV 106
  • Jun 17, 2026LV 86atPHX 76
  • May 9, 2026PHX 99atLV 66
  • Oct 10, 2025LV 97atPHX 86
  • Oct 8, 2025LV 90atPHX 88
  • Oct 5, 2025PHX 78atLV 91
  • Oct 3, 2025PHX 86atLV 89
  • Aug 21, 2025PHX 61atLV 83
  • Aug 15, 2025LV 86atPHX 83

Finished meetings between these two teams in the data we have. Descriptive history, not a forecast of tonight.

From box scores and play-by-play. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel and BetMGM; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. Informational only. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.