Probetrics — Sports Analytics
← WNBA

Player props

No lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number

Shakira Austin
Shakira Austin
WSH vs CHI
Player page →
No line posted
Showing the games against 17.5
Hit rate
50.0% [5/10]
90% range 27–73%
PTS
18.7
+1.5
REB
9.2
-0.3
AST
2.5
-0.0
3PM
0.0
-0.4
MIN
29.3
-0.2

Averages over the games shown; the small number is the difference from the season average.

Closing lines fill in game by game from our first props pull (Sep 23, 2026); none of these games has one yet.

Aug 15 vs LA: 17 (line 17.5)17LAAug 15Aug 19 vs TOR: 11 (line 17.5)11TORAug 19Aug 21 vs MIN: 17 (line 17.5)17MINAug 21Aug 23 @ POR: 31 (line 17.5)31@PORAug 23Aug 25 @ PHX: 16 (line 17.5)16@PHXAug 25Aug 27 @ PHX: 11 (line 17.5)11@PHXAug 27Aug 28 @ LA: 19 (line 17.5)19@LAAug 28Sep 17 @ CHI: 20 (line 17.5)20@CHISep 17Sep 20 @ IND: 20 (line 17.5)20@INDSep 20Sep 22 vs CON: 25 (line 17.5)25CONSep 2217.5
What if the line were17.5 (5-5)

Shot types vs CHI

2026, 43 games

TypePointsFGAFG%CHI allows
Drives & floaters4.5 (27%)4.946%15.2 #4
Free throws4.4 (26%)——18.8 #3
Post-ups & turnarounds1.4 (8%)1.742%3.8 #4
Other at the rim1.4 (8%)1.260%2.4 #13
Spot-up jumpers1.2 (7%)1.335%16.9 #9
Putbacks1.1 (7%)1.057%6.1 #2
Cuts & lobs1.1 (7%)0.775%5.2 #11
Pull-ups & step-backs0.9 (5%)0.948%9.0 #9
Transition0.9 (5%)0.945%12.2 #3

CHI allows = points a game its opponents score that way; rank 1 = allows the most. Transition = first shot within 7s of a stop or score; putback = within 3s of an own offensive rebound; the rest by ESPN's shot label.

Shooting zones

Shakira Austin · 951 attempts, last two seasons

66%38936%43841%2733%636%2850%225%61
Restricted area: 256/389 (66%)
Paint (non-RA): 157/438 (36%)
Left mid-range: 11/27 (41%)
Center mid-range: 2/6 (33%)
Right mid-range: 10/28 (36%)
Right corner 3: 1/2 (50%)
Above the break 3: 15/61 (25%)

Where they shoot from and how often it goes in, by zone. From ESPN's charted shot locations. Descriptive history, not a forecast.

Similar players vs CHI

Similarity from 2026 box scores

Avg diff
+3.30
Avg diff %
+28%
Went over
74% (23/31)
DatePlayerVsResultDiff
Sep 24Kiki Iriafen WSH15.3 avg16+5%
Sep 22Isabelle Harrison TOR12.3 avg21+71%
Sep 19Angel Reese ATL16.4 avg23+40%
Sep 17Kiki Iriafen WSH15.3 avg18+17%
Aug 29Breanna Stewart NY20.7 avg13-37%
Aug 25Aaliyah Edwards CON9.9 avg26+164%
Aug 18Breanna Stewart NY20.8 avg22+6%
Aug 16Dominique Malonga SEA17.1 avg19+11%
Aug 10Dominique Malonga SEA17.1 avg26+52%
Aug 8Aliyah Boston IND17.0 avg13-24%
1 / 4

Compared with: Angel Reese, Dominique Malonga, Isabelle Harrison, Dearica Hamby, Breanna Stewart, Olivia Nelson-Ododa, Natasha Howard, Kiki Iriafen, Brittney Griner, Aliyah Boston, Aaliyah Edwards, Nyara Sabally.

Players whose minutes and per-36 scoring, rebounding, playmaking, three-point and free-throw volume, steals, blocks and turnovers are closest to this player's. Each game is measured against its closing line (CLOSE) where we have one, otherwise against that player's own average in the same season before that game (AVG). Other players' history, not a projection for this one.

At a glance
CHIWSH
16-28Record28-16
4-6Last 108-2
-4.5#10Net rating+1.6#8
101.4#13Offense102.4#12
106.0#10Defense100.8#3
85.5#1Pace82.0#14
49.7#13eFG%50.2#11
50.7#7Opp eFG%49.2#2
14.3#5Turnover %16.8#15
21.6#14Off. rebound %31.5#1

Per 100 possessions; rank 1 = best (for Defense and Opp eFG%, the lowest).

The shape of the matchup

Effective field-goal percentage (offense)ShootingTurnovers per 100 plays — fewer is better (offense)TurnoversShare of its own misses rebounded (offense)O-Reb%Free throws made per field-goal attempt (offense)FT rateEffective field-goal percentage allowed (defense)Shooting DTurnovers forced per 100 plays (defense)TakeawaysShare of opponent misses kept off the boards (defense)D-Reb%Free throws allowed per field-goal attempt — fewer is better (defense)FT def
CHIWSH

Each axis is a percentile among 15 teams on that measure (1 = best), offense on the left half of the wheel, defense on the right. Bigger is better.

Ratings · 2026

−4.5 #10Net rating+1.6 #8
101.4 #13Offensive rating102.4 #12
106.0 #10Defensive rating100.8 #3
85.5 #1Pace82.0 #14
CHIWSH

The four factors

CHI offense vs WSH defenseCHI OWSH D
Shooting (eFG%)49.7% #1349.2% #2
Turnovers14.3% #514.2% #12
Offensive rebounding21.6% #1422.0% #2
Free throws (FTr)24.8% #721.6% #3
Rating101.4 #13100.8 #3
WSH offense vs CHI defenseWSH OCHI D
Shooting (eFG%)50.2% #1150.7% #7
Turnovers16.8% #1514.4% #11
Offensive rebounding31.5% #126.7% #10
Free throws (FTr)27.7% #226.6% #13
Rating102.4 #12106.0 #10

League rank among 15 teams (1 = best; a defense ranks well for allowing less shooting, more turnovers forced, fewer offensive rebounds and fewer free throws).

Shot types

2026 · points a game by shot type · rank 1 = the most in the league

CHI offense vs WSH defense

TypeCHI scoresWSH allows
Spot-up jumpers14.0 #1516.4 #13
Free throws17.3 #614.9 #13
Drives & floaters15.3 #513.5 #11
Transition11.3 #711.8 #5
Pull-ups & step-backsmatch11.3 #510.8 #4
Cuts & lobs7.1 #34.5 #13
Putbacks4.7 #124.2 #15
Post-ups & turnarounds2.5 #123.3 #11
Other at the rim2.6 #62.5 #11

WSH offense vs CHI defense

TypeWSH scoresCHI allows
Spot-up jumpers14.8 #1316.9 #9
Free throwsmatch18.2 #418.8 #3
Drives & floatersmatch15.4 #415.2 #4
Transition7.8 #1512.2 #3
Pull-ups & step-backs6.1 #159.0 #9
Cuts & lobs4.5 #125.2 #11
Putbacksmatch6.5 #26.1 #2
Post-ups & turnaroundsmatch4.0 #53.8 #4
Other at the rim6.2 #12.4 #13

From ESPN play-by-play: transition = the first shot within 7 seconds of a defensive rebound, turnover or opponent score; putback = within 3 seconds of the team's own offensive rebound; the rest by ESPN's shot label (spot-up = the plain jump shot). Free throws from the box score. Hover a number for the league average. An approximation of play types, not tracking data.

Scoring by quarter and half

per game, last 17 games
CHIWSHAvg team
ForAgainstForAgainst
Q120.721.423.420.222.2
Q220.423.221.619.021.4
Q321.424.522.122.021.8
Q423.123.021.420.821.7
1st half41.144.645.039.243.6
2nd half44.547.543.542.843.7
Game85.692.188.582.187.3
Points in the 1st half48%48%51%48%50%

Average points per game in each period, from ESPN box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.

CHI rotation · last 15 games

PlayerMinPtsRebAst
Natasha Cloud28.413.83.75.2
Kamilla Cardoso26.414.99.12.3
Courtney Vandersloot24.99.73.46.1
Azura Stevens22.98.35.41.2
Sydney Taylor20.611.92.12.7
Jacy Sheldon19.86.11.31.9
Elizabeth Williams16.94.63.31.2
Gabriela Jaquez16.25.21.70.6

WSH rotation · last 15 games

PlayerMinPtsRebAst
Sonia Citron31.915.53.65.5
Shakira Austin29.520.29.52.4
Kiki Iriafen27.915.29.91.5
Georgia Amoore23.57.91.53.3
Michaela Onyenwere21.57.31.61.5
Lauren Betts19.96.15.81.5
Cotie McMahon18.67.32.71.7
Betnijah Laney-Hamilton16.14.32.02.4

CHI · last 10

16-28 · 1 day rest
  • Sep 22 vs TORW 97–85
  • Sep 19 @ ATLL 81–106
  • Sep 17 vs WSHL 80–110
  • Aug 29 @ NYL 66–85
  • Aug 25 @ CONL 81–87
  • Aug 23 vs INDL 90–113
  • Aug 21 vs GSW 73–70
  • Aug 18 vs NYW 93–86
  • Aug 16 @ SEAW 82–80
  • Aug 12 @ GSL 71–91
4-6 in these

WSH · last 10

28-16 · 1 day rest
  • Sep 22 vs CONW 79–69
  • Sep 20 @ INDW 93–77
  • Sep 17 @ CHIW 110–80
  • Aug 28 @ LAL 82–88
  • Aug 27 @ PHXW 80–73
  • Aug 25 @ PHXW 94–84
  • Aug 23 @ PORW 105–100
  • Aug 21 vs MINL 84–94
  • Aug 19 vs TORW 93–82
  • Aug 15 vs LAW 80–70
8-2 in these

Recent meetings

  • Sep 24, 2026CHI 93atWSH 101
  • Sep 17, 2026WSH 110atCHI 80
  • Jun 2, 2026CHI 72atWSH 90
  • Aug 5, 2025WSH 64atCHI 78
  • Jul 29, 2025CHI 86atWSH 103
  • Jul 8, 2025CHI 79atWSH 81
  • Jun 17, 2025WSH 79atCHI 72
  • Sep 11, 2024WSH 89atCHI 58
  • Aug 28, 2024WSH 74atCHI 70
  • Jun 14, 2024CHI 81atWSH 83

Finished meetings between these two teams in the data we have. Descriptive history, not a forecast of tonight.

From ESPN box scores and play-by-play. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel and BetMGM via TheRundown; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. Informational only. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.