Probetrics — Sports Analytics
← WNBA
Premium

The model's read on Toronto Tempo at Connecticut Sun

The numbers above are the market's. Premium adds the model's call on this game.

  • ✓Who the model picks, and how sure it is
  • ✓Spread and total leans against the market
  • ✓The matchups behind the call, in plain English
Premium

Player props

No lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number

Marina Mabrey
Marina Mabrey
TOR vs CON
Player page →
No line posted
Showing the games against 20.5
Hit rate
50.0% [5/10]
90% range 27–73%
PTS
19.1
-1.7
REB
2.8
-0.5
AST
3.8
+0.1
3PM
2.9
-0.4
MIN
30.2
+0.7

Averages over the games shown; the small number is the difference from the season average.

Closing lines fill in game by game from our first props pull (Sep 23, 2026); none of these games has one yet.

Jul 14 vs WSH: 8 (line 20.5)8WSHJul 14Jul 17 vs ATL: 26 (line 20.5)26ATLJul 17Jul 20 vs LV: 14 (line 20.5)14LVJul 20Jul 28 @ MIN: 25 (line 20.5)25@MINJul 28Jul 30 vs MIN: 16 (line 20.5)16MINJul 30Aug 4 @ GS: 12 (line 20.5)12@GSAug 4Aug 6 @ POR: 9 (line 20.5)9@PORAug 6Aug 10 @ ATL: 36 (line 20.5)36@ATLAug 10Aug 12 @ DAL: 23 (line 20.5)23@DALAug 12Aug 18 vs IND: 22 (line 20.5)22INDAug 1820.5
What if the line were20.5 (5-5)

Shot types vs CON

2026, 32 games

TypePointsFGAFG%CON allows
Pull-ups & step-backs5.5 (27%)5.241%8.4 #14
Free throws3.9 (19%)——19.0 #2
Spot-up jumpers3.5 (17%)3.138%16.5 #11
Drives & floaters3.3 (16%)2.857%17.5 #1
Transition2.7 (13%)2.842%9.9 #13
Putbacks0.7 (3%)0.645%4.7 #12
Cuts & lobs0.4 (2%)0.367%5.6 #8
Post-ups & turnarounds0.3 (1%)0.429%3.4 #9
Other at the rim0.2 (1%)0.175%2.4 #14

CON allows = points a game its opponents score that way; rank 1 = allows the most. Transition = first shot within 7s of a stop or score; putback = within 3s of an own offensive rebound; the rest by the shot label.

Shooting zones

Marina Mabrey · 982 attempts, last two seasons

65%15840%20542%5727%1142%6242%4533%3332%411
Restricted area: 102/158 (65%)
Paint (non-RA): 81/205 (40%)
Left mid-range: 24/57 (42%)
Center mid-range: 3/11 (27%)
Right mid-range: 26/62 (42%)
Left corner 3: 19/45 (42%)
Right corner 3: 11/33 (33%)
Above the break 3: 131/411 (32%)

Where they shoot from and how often it goes in, by zone. From charted shot locations. Descriptive history, not a forecast.

Similar players vs CON

Similarity from 2026 box scores

Avg diff
+0.70
Avg diff %
+6%
Went over
45% (10/22)
DatePlayerVsResultDiff
Sep 20Olivia Miles MIN19.7 avg21+7%
Aug 28Kelsey Mitchell IND24.8 avg34+37%
Aug 25Sydney Taylor CHI14.2 avg4-72%
Aug 22Rae Burrell LA14.2 avg20+41%
Aug 20Jackie Young LV18.9 avg24+27%
Aug 18Rae Burrell LA14.1 avg19+35%
Aug 7Kelsey Plum PHX23.3 avg25+7%
Aug 7Kahleah Copper PHX21.0 avg16-24%
Jul 30Sydney Taylor CHI14.2 avg14-1%
Jul 22Kelsey Mitchell IND23.3 avg23-1%
1 / 3

Compared with: Kelsey Plum, Sydney Taylor, Sabrina Ionescu, Satou Sabally, Kelsey Mitchell, Flau'jae Johnson, Jackie Young, Kahleah Copper, Olivia Miles, Jovana Nogic, Natisha Hiedeman, Rae Burrell.

Players whose minutes and per-36 scoring, rebounding, playmaking, three-point and free-throw volume, steals, blocks and turnovers are closest to this player's. Each game is measured against its closing line (CLOSE) where we have one, otherwise against that player's own average in the same season before that game (AVG). Other players' history, not a projection for this one.

At a glance
TORCON
11-33Record11-33
1-9Last 102-8
-10.5#14Net rating-11.1#15
103.0#9Offense95.3#15
113.5#15Defense106.4#11
83.2#7Pace82.8#9
50.4#10eFG%46.8#15
54.7#15Opp eFG%52.6#10
15.9#10Turnover %15.7#9
26.1#5Off. rebound %25.9#7

Per 100 possessions; rank 1 = best (for Defense and Opp eFG%, the lowest).

The shape of the matchup

Effective field-goal percentage (offense)ShootingTurnovers per 100 plays — fewer is better (offense)TurnoversShare of its own misses rebounded (offense)O-Reb%Free throws made per field-goal attempt (offense)FT rateEffective field-goal percentage allowed (defense)Shooting DTurnovers forced per 100 plays (defense)TakeawaysShare of opponent misses kept off the boards (defense)D-Reb%Free throws allowed per field-goal attempt — fewer is better (defense)FT def
TORCON

Each axis is a percentile among 15 teams on that measure (1 = best), offense on the left half of the wheel, defense on the right. Bigger is better.

Ratings · 2026

−10.5 #14Net rating−11.1 #15
103.0 #9Offensive rating95.3 #15
113.5 #15Defensive rating106.4 #11
83.2 #7Pace82.8 #9
TORCON

The four factors

TOR offense vs CON defenseTOR OCON D
Shooting (eFG%)50.4% #1052.6% #10
Turnovers15.9% #1015.8% #4
Offensive rebounding26.1% #525.5% #9
Free throws (FTr)24.9% #628.8% #15
Rating103.0 #9106.4 #11
CON offense vs TOR defenseCON OTOR D
Shooting (eFG%)46.8% #1554.7% #15
Turnovers15.7% #913.8% #14
Offensive rebounding25.9% #729.4% #14
Free throws (FTr)21.5% #1124.2% #9
Rating95.3 #15113.5 #15

League rank among 15 teams (1 = best; a defense ranks well for allowing less shooting, more turnovers forced, fewer offensive rebounds and fewer free throws).

Shot types

2026 · points a game by shot type · rank 1 = the most in the league

TOR offense vs CON defense

TypeTOR scoresCON allows
Spot-up jumpers18.2 #716.5 #11
Free throws17.0 #719.0 #2
Drives & floaters14.0 #917.5 #1
Transition10.9 #99.9 #13
Pull-ups & step-backs10.5 #68.4 #14
Cuts & lobs4.2 #145.6 #8
Putbacks5.2 #104.7 #12
Post-ups & turnarounds2.7 #113.4 #9
Other at the rim2.2 #122.4 #14

CON offense vs TOR defense

TypeCON scoresTOR allows
Spot-up jumpers14.4 #1420.9 #2
Free throws14.7 #1217.1 #6
Drives & floaters12.7 #1314.2 #7
Transition10.3 #1212.2 #4
Pull-ups & step-backs8.3 #118.9 #11
Cuts & lobs4.5 #136.6 #2
Putbacksmatch5.8 #56.9 #1
Post-ups & turnarounds4.1 #33.5 #7
Other at the rimmatch3.4 #23.3 #1

From play-by-play: transition = the first shot within 7 seconds of a defensive rebound, turnover or opponent score; putback = within 3 seconds of the team's own offensive rebound; the rest by the shot label (spot-up = the plain jump shot). Free throws from the box score. Hover a number for the league average. An approximation of play types, not tracking data.

Scoring by quarter and half

per game, last 17 games
TORCONAvg team
ForAgainstForAgainst
Q120.124.720.623.522.1
Q220.423.119.923.121.4
Q319.825.718.322.121.8
Q420.722.718.220.921.7
1st half40.447.840.546.643.5
2nd half40.548.436.543.043.7
Game80.996.277.189.687.2
Points in the 1st half50%50%53%52%50%

Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.

TOR rotation · last 15 games

PlayerMinPtsRebAst
Marina Mabrey30.020.42.03.4
Kiki Rice28.114.02.74.2
Laura Juskaite27.513.64.71.9
Julie Allemand27.35.93.15.4
Nyara Sabally25.415.07.61.8
Maria Conde25.36.33.93.0
Isabelle Harrison23.411.37.31.5
Kiana Williams19.76.00.31.3

CON rotation · last 15 games

PlayerMinPtsRebAst
Leila Lacan27.610.11.84.6
Charlisse Leger-Walker25.98.53.24.2
Aaliyah Edwards24.714.26.71.1
Kennedy Burke24.511.03.01.1
Diamond Miller23.812.03.41.6
Saniya Rivers22.86.63.12.9
Olivia Nelson-Ododa21.311.36.30.8
Hailey Van Lith15.93.41.81.8

TOR · last 10

11-33 · 1 day rest
  • Sep 22 @ CHIL 85–97
  • Sep 20 vs NYL 69–106
  • Sep 18 vs INDL 85–103
  • Aug 29 @ PHXL 69–101
  • Aug 28 @ LVL 73–93
  • Aug 26 @ SEAL 78–90
  • Aug 23 vs LVL 78–88
  • Aug 21 vs PORW 82–79
  • Aug 19 @ WSHL 82–93
  • Aug 18 vs INDL 95–101
1-9 in these

CON · last 10

11-33 · 1 day rest
  • Sep 22 @ WSHL 69–79
  • Sep 20 vs MINL 89–101
  • Sep 17 @ ATLL 59–103
  • Aug 30 @ DALL 71–97
  • Aug 28 @ INDL 91–111
  • Aug 26 vs GSL 64–89
  • Aug 25 vs CHIW 87–81
  • Aug 22 @ LAL 68–77
  • Aug 20 @ LVL 78–101
  • Aug 18 vs LAW 85–77
2-8 in these

Recent meetings

  • Sep 24, 2026TOR 81atCON 95
  • Jun 19, 2026TOR 101atCON 97
  • Jun 10, 2026CON 102atTOR 106

Finished meetings between these two teams in the data we have. Descriptive history, not a forecast of tonight.

From box scores and play-by-play. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel and BetMGM; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. Informational only. 21+, 1-800-GAMBLER.