Loading the fight…
⌘K
Natalia Silva beat Wang Cong by decision in round 5 at UFC 332: Silva vs. Wang on Oct 3, 2026.
Bars start at zero; a full bar is the top 5% of the division. Tap a row for what it measures and the sample behind it.
Wang 2" taller · Wang +1" reach · Silva 5 years younger
Each cell is one way the fight ends, with the books' margin taken out; the map adds to 100%. The books price the round and the method separately, never a method in a given round. Tap a cell for its price.
The line is the map's chance the fight is still going (finishes read as spread evenly through a round). ◇ = a separate two-way price for the same thing: over 4.5 rounds 69% · goes the distance 68%.
Oldest to newest. Above the line: won; below: lost. Filled: ended early (K = KO/TKO, S = submission, then the round). Outline D: went to the judges. Tap a tile for the fight.
12 of 20 of their tracked fights went the distance. For this one, the books priced 65% that it goes the distance. Most of those were 3-round fights; this one is scheduled for 5. History, not a forecast.
Median sportsbook win chance with the books' margin taken out (the same no-vig number as above, the two sides add to 100%), one point an hour since the line opened.
Median sportsbook win chance with the books' margin taken out (the same no-vig number as above, the two sides add to 100%), one point an hour since the line opened.
| Book | Wang | Silva | Rounds | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best price | +175 Caesars | -192 DraftKings | 4.5 | -238 | +205 |
| BetMGM | +165 | -200 | — | — | — |
| DraftKings | +170 | -192 | 4.5 | -238 | +180 |
| FanDuel | +166 | -198 | 4.5 | -280 | +205 |
| Hard Rock | +165 | -200 | 1.5 | -1300 | +575 |
| Caesars | +175 | -210 | — | — | — |
Fighter numbers are from tracked fights; odds are the books' own. Descriptive data, not a forecast. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER. Sportsbook links may be affiliate links; we may earn a commission if you sign up through them.
