Skip to main content
ProbetricsProbetrics

Milwaukee at Indiana State: College Basketball, Nov 11, 2026

LiveWed, Nov 11, 7:00 PM ETHulman Center · Terre Haute, IN
Milwaukee Panthers0-2
28
Indiana State Sycamores1-1
24
Spread
INST -4.5
(−110)
Total
154.5
▲ 1 since open
MILW ML
+160
INST ML
−190
Model's read
Pro
Start 7-day free trialThe model's winner call: locked before the start, graded in public, built on the market's price.
Checking your plan for the model's read…

4 books · best MILW +160 DraftKings · INST −190 BetMGM

Matchup · team comparison, advantage chart, key players

Team comparisonThe two teams' season numbers side by side, with each team's place in the league (1st = best, of every team that has played); green marks the better side. Every table is on the Stats tab.History

MILWINST
0-2
Record
1-1
0-2
Last 10
1-1
67.5 · 257th
Points / game
69.5 · 239th
95.0 · 345th
Points allowed / game
72.0 · 134th
−36.1 · 331st
Net ratingPoints scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions.
−3.8 · 191st
76.3 · 47th
PacePossessions per game, estimated from box scores. A faster team is not a better one.
66.6 · 311th
42.5% · 313th
Shooting · effective FG%Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5.
48.3% · 226th
19.7% · 315th
Turnovers · per 100 playsTurnovers the offense commits; fewer is better.
13.8% · 113th
31.0% · 195th
Offensive rebounding %
26.4% · 278th
22.2% · 235th
Free throw rateFree throws made per field-goal attempt.
23.3% · 223rd

2026–27 season. Places are among 396 teams.

Where each offense has the advantageEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces, one bar per measure: longer = a better setup for the offense; volt = the offense ranks clearly better, orange = the defense does. The four factors (shooting, turnovers, rebounding, free throws) come first in the full list.History

When MILW has the ballMILW offense against INST defense

MILW has the clear advantage in offensive rebounding %; INST's defense has it in points and turnovers.

  • Offensive rebounding %MILW #195 vs INST #274
  • ReboundsMILW #200 vs INST #224
  • Free throw rateMILW #235 vs INST #226
Show 7 more
  • 3-point %MILW #299 vs INST #281
  • Field goal %MILW #303 vs INST #256
  • Free throw %MILW #126 vs INST #69
  • ShootingMILW #313 vs INST #253
  • 2-point %MILW #285 vs INST #211
  • PointsMILW #257 vs INST #134
  • TurnoversMILW #315 vs INST #61
When INST has the ballINST offense against MILW defense

INST has the clear advantage in 3-point %, free throw %, shooting, turnovers, field goal % and points; MILW's defense has it in offensive rebounding %.

  • 3-point %INST #88 vs MILW #362
  • Free throw %INST #61 vs MILW #276
  • ShootingINST #226 vs MILW #348
Show 7 more
  • TurnoversINST #113 vs MILW #230
  • Field goal %INST #222 vs MILW #335
  • PointsINST #239 vs MILW #345
  • 2-point %INST #281 vs MILW #266
  • Free throw rateINST #223 vs MILW #197
  • ReboundsINST #306 vs MILW #239
  • Offensive rebounding %INST #278 vs MILW #166
Both ranks side by side, with every value
ranks betterranks worseStronger79+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 396 (#1 = best)
MILW offensevsINST defense

MILW offense ranks better in 2 of 10 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · INST defense in 8 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.
42.5%
#313
54.2%
slight#253
Turnovers · per 100 playsTurnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.
19.7%
#315
19.3%
Stronger#61
Offensive rebounding %Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.
31.0%
#195Stronger
35.4%
#274
Free throw rateFree throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.
22.2%
#235
27.4%
slight#226
Points
67.5
#257
72.0
Stronger#134
Field goal %
37.3%
#303
47.2%
slight#256
2-point %
44.2%
#285
53.8%
slight#211
3-point %
26.5%
#299
36.6%
slight#281
Free throw %
73.7%
#126
64.4%
slight#69
Rebounds
35.0
#200slight
38.0
#224
INST offensevsMILW defense

INST offense ranks better in 6 of 10 matchups (6 by a clear margin) · MILW defense in 4 (1 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.
48.3%
#226Stronger
61.3%
#348
Turnovers · per 100 playsTurnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.
13.8%
#113Stronger
14.5%
#230
Offensive rebounding %Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.
26.4%
#278
30.2%
Stronger#166
Free throw rateFree throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.
23.3%
#223
25.8%
slight#197
Points
69.5
#239Stronger
95.0
#345
Field goal %
42.2%
#222Stronger
52.3%
#335
2-point %
44.3%
#281
57.1%
slight#266
3-point %
37.8%
#88Stronger
45.1%
#362
Free throw %
77.1%
#61Stronger
75.0%
#276
Rebounds
30.5
#306
38.5
slight#239

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 396 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Soft spots and mismatches

  • MILWOffensive rebounding %MILW #195 against INST #274
  • INST3-point %INST #88 against MILW #362

ProThe key players against this defense, and the soft spots once props are posted.

Start 7-day free trial
Checking your plan…

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. Data and analytics only, not betting advice: any bet is your own decision, and we are not responsible for losses. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER. Sportsbook links are plain links, not affiliate links: no sportsbook pays us.