Loading the game…
⌘K
UMass Lowell beat Binghamton 79–53 at home on Mar 1, 2025.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  BING | 26 | 27 | 53 |
  UML | 40 | 39 | 79 |
Binghamton BearcatsUMass Lowell River Hawks| BING | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gavin Walsh | 30 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-1 |
| Tymu Chenery | 25 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 3-6 | 2-5 |
| Wes Peterson Jr. | 22 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Chris Walker | 19 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Nehemiah Benson | 19 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2-5 | 0-0 |
| Ben Callahan-Gold | 27 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 4-10 | 2-5 |
| Evan Ashe | 26 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 5-8 | 1-3 |
| Jayden Lemond | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Max Sims | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-2 |
| Stephan Snagg | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Robby Phillips | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 53 | 22 | 7 | 22-50 | 5-18 |
| UML | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Somerville | 40 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 5-10 | 3-7 |
| Quinton Mincey | 39 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 8-12 | 3-5 |
| Max Brooks | 29 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 10-13 | 0-0 |
| Cam Morris III | 28 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 4-5 | 0-1 |
| Yuri Covington | 25 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 3-6 | 2-5 |
| Xzavier Lino | 21 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-4 | 1-2 |
| Anthony Blunt | 16 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Ephraim Acquah | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Armani Perkins | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 79 | 24 | 20 | 33-54 | 9-21 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
BING offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · UML defense in 3 (1 by a clear margin)
UML offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · BING defense in 2 (1 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
BINGUMLExpected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
BINGUMLNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Quinton Mincey's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tymu Chenery | 37.0 | 14.3 | 5.7 | 3.4 |
| Gavin Walsh | 35.0 | 12.9 | 12.0 | 1.9 |
| Wes Peterson Jr. | 33.9 | 10.5 | 3.2 | 2.0 |
| Chris Walker | 33.2 | 11.7 | 4.1 | 2.1 |
| Nehemiah Benson | 25.4 | 11.2 | 4.3 | 1.7 |
| Evan Ashe | 19.6 | 5.1 | 2.3 | 0.7 |
| Ben Callahan-Gold | 18.8 | 7.0 | 2.6 | 0.5 |
| Jackson Benigni | 13.8 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quinton Mincey | 38.0 | 16.3 | 7.8 | 2.9 |
| Martin Somerville | 34.6 | 15.0 | 2.7 | 4.5 |
| Max Brooks | 33.5 | 16.2 | 7.8 | 1.6 |
| Yuri Covington | 30.3 | 11.0 | 3.3 | 1.5 |
| Cam Morris III | 23.4 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 1.0 |
| Quincy Clark | 18.0 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Anthony Blunt | 17.4 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| Xzavier Lino | 13.0 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 0.4 |
BING offenseper gameUML defenseRank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
BINGForAgainst48% of BING's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
UMLForAgainst47% of UML's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
BING 4series6 UML| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2026 | BING 79 | UML 92 | UML+13 | +13 |
| Jan 10, 2026 | UML 73 | BING 68 | UML+5 | +5 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2025 | BING 53 | UML 79 | UML+26 | +26 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | UML 54 | BING 66 | BING+12 | +12 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2024 | BING 80 | UML 87 | UML+7 | +7 |
| Jan 20, 2024 | UML 80 | BING 60 | UML+20 | +20 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2023 | BING 70 | UML 84 | UML+14 | +14 |
| Jan 14, 2023 | UML 65 | BING 66 | BING+1 | +1 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2022 | BING 78 | UML 64 | BING+14 | +14 |
| Jan 2, 2022 | UML 63 | BING 68 | BING+5 | +5 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
