Loading the game…
⌘K
Abilene Christian beat Utah Tech 80–72 at home on Feb 22, 2025.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  UTU | 31 | 41 | 72 |
  ACU | 44 | 36 | 80 |
Utah Tech TrailblazersAbilene Christian Wildcats| UTU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noa Gonsalves | 36 | 19 | 4 | 2 | 4-13 | 2-8 |
| Hakim Byrd | 36 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 5-9 | 2-3 |
| Samuel Ariyibi | 27 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 3-9 | 0-2 |
| Beon Riley | 26 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 3-4 | 2-2 |
| Madiba Owona | 22 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 |
| Justin Bieker | 22 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 3-6 | 2-5 |
| Tennessee Rainwater | 18 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Stone Hutchings | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Unisa Turay | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Pavle Misic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 72 | 32 | 9 | 22-54 | 8-22 |
| ACU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quion Williams | 35 | 18 | 4 | 4 | 7-13 | 0-2 |
| Hunter Jack Madden | 30 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 4-10 | 1-5 |
| Bradyn Hubbard | 25 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-1 |
| Leonardo Bettiol | 24 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 8-13 | 0-0 |
| Rich Smith | 22 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Nasir DeGruy | 21 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-1 |
| Dontrez Williams | 15 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Cade Hornecker | 15 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Yaniel Rivera | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| Christian Alston | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 80 | 30 | 16 | 30-59 | 3-11 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
UTU offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · ACU defense in 3 (1 by a clear margin)
ACU offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · UTU defense in 2 (1 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
UTUACUExpected pace: about 69 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
UTUACUNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Noa Gonsalves's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noa Gonsalves | 36.2 | 15.4 | 2.9 | 1.5 |
| Hakim Byrd | 32.9 | 10.3 | 2.1 | 3.3 |
| Beon Riley | 30.7 | 13.9 | 7.8 | 2.1 |
| Samuel Ariyibi | 25.5 | 8.2 | 5.3 | 2.5 |
| Justin Bieker | 24.5 | 6.0 | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Madiba Owona | 20.7 | 7.7 | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| Tennessee Rainwater | 15.5 | 5.3 | 2.4 | 0.6 |
| Stone Hutchings | 7.5 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quion Williams | 29.4 | 13.5 | 5.2 | 2.3 |
| Leonardo Bettiol | 28.2 | 11.7 | 4.2 | 1.3 |
| Hunter Jack Madden | 27.1 | 7.9 | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| Bradyn Hubbard | 25.0 | 10.8 | 5.6 | 0.9 |
| Rich Smith | 21.6 | 5.1 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
| Nasir DeGruy | 19.7 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Dontrez Williams | 16.1 | 5.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 |
| Yaniel Rivera | 13.7 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 0.9 |
UTU offenseper gameACU defenseRank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
UTUForAgainst46% of UTU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
ACUForAgainst44% of ACU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
UTU 4series6 ACU| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | ACU 74 | UTU 80 | UTU+6 | +6 |
| Feb 26, 2026 | ACU 81 | UTU 85 | UTU+4 | +4 |
| Jan 29, 2026 | UTU 76 | ACU 70 | UTU+6 | +6 |
| Jan 1, 2026 | UTU 79 | ACU 64 | UTU+15 | +15 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2025 | UTU 72 | ACU 80 | ACU+8 | +8 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | ACU 86 | UTU 72 | ACU+14 | +14 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2024 | ACU 86 | UTU 79 | ACU+7 | +7 |
| Jan 25, 2024 | UTU 60 | ACU 82 | ACU+22 | +22 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2023 | UTU 76 | ACU 81 | ACU+5 | +5 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2022 | UTU 64 | ACU 80 | ACU+16 | +16 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
