Radford vs Presbyterian Odds, Stats & Props

Line scoreHistory

Team	1st	2nd	Final
RAD	44	38	82
PRES	27	42	69

Top performersHistory

Radford Highlanders

Jarvis MossG
24 pts · 7 reb · 2 ast
8-13 FG
6-10 3PT
Truth HarrisG
15 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
4-6 FG
2-2 3PT
TJ NeSmithF
10 pts · 2 reb
4-5 FG

Presbyterian Blue Hose

Kobe StewartG
28 pts · 5 reb · 2 ast
11-15 FG
6-9 3PT
Iverson KingG
14 pts · 3 reb
5-9 FG
1-2 3PT
Kaleb ScottF
11 pts · 3 reb · 3 ast
5-9 FG

Box scoreHistory

every player

RAD	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Jarvis Moss	35	24	7	2	1	0	0	8-13	6-10	2-2	—
Brandon Maclin	29	9	3	1	1	0	2	3-5	1-3	2-3	—
Truth Harris	25	15	2	1	1	0	2	4-6	2-2	5-6	—
Josiah Harris	22	2	5	0	1	0	2	1-5	0-0	0-0	—
Isaiah Gaines	21	2	4	2	0	1	2	1-2	0-0	0-1	—
Ibu Yamazaki	21	9	0	0	0	1	0	4-5	1-1	0-0	—
David Early	18	9	0	0	0	0	1	3-5	0-1	3-3	—
TJ NeSmith	14	10	2	0	1	0	0	4-5	0-0	2-2	—
Zion Walker	13	2	2	3	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	2-2	—
Tony Felder	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		82	25	9	5	2	9	28-47	10-17	16-19

PRES	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Iverson King	32	14	3	0	0	0	2	5-9	1-2	3-3	—
Kaleb Scott	32	11	3	3	0	0	1	5-9	0-0	1-4	—
Jamahri Harvey	32	8	2	1	1	1	0	2-8	2-6	2-2	—
Kobe Stewart	30	28	5	2	0	0	1	11-15	6-9	0-0	—
Kory Mincy	28	3	1	4	3	0	3	1-4	1-4	0-0	—
Quadir Pettaway	12	2	1	3	0	0	1	0-2	0-2	2-2	—
Jaylen Peterson	12	1	4	0	1	1	1	0-0	0-0	1-2	—
Triston Wilson	10	0	2	0	0	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Carl Parrish	9	2	2	0	0	0	0	1-3	0-2	0-0	—
Houston Jones	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		69	23	13	5	2	10	25-51	10-25	9-13

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsHistory

RADPRES

59.6%

Field goals

49.0%

58.8%

Three-pointers

40.0%

84.2%

Free throws

69.2%

25

Rebounds

25

7

Offensive rebounds

11

9

Assists

13

9

Turnovers

11

5

Steals

5

2

Blocks

2

34

Points in the paint

28

9

Fast-break points

11

12

Fouls

16

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest

Offense vs defense: the four factorsHistory

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 360 (#1 = best)

RAD offensevsPRES defense

RAD offense ranks better in 3 of 4 matchups (3 by a clear margin) · PRES defense in 1

Shooting · effective FG%

50.8%

#168Stronger

52.5%

#256

Turnovers · per 100 plays

15.4%

#203

15.5%

slight#141

Offensive rebounding %

34.2%

#53Stronger

31.3%

#260

Free throw rate

31.1%

#10Stronger

28.1%

#308

PRES offensevsRAD defense

PRES offense ranks better in 4 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · RAD defense in 0

Shooting · effective FG%

51.2%

#146slight

51.2%

#191

Turnovers · per 100 plays

14.3%

#114Stronger

14.6%

#210

Offensive rebounding %

29.6%

#191slight

30.1%

#201

Free throw rate

21.3%

#272slight

28.2%

#313

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesHistory

RADPRES

+0.7 162ndNet rating232nd −3.3

111.6 83rdOffensive rating168th 107.6

110.9 267thDefensive rating266th 110.8

64.1 347thPace296th 65.6

Expected pace: about 65 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

RAD getting to the line
RAD offense 31.1% (10th) vs PRES defense allowing 28.1% (308th)
+298 spots
PRES 3-point shooting
PRES offense 36.0% (64th) vs RAD defense allowing 35.7% (288th)
+224 spots
RAD offensive rebounding
RAD offense 34.2% (53rd) vs PRES defense allowing 31.3% (260th)
+207 spots
RAD 3-point shooting
RAD offense 35.3% (95th) vs PRES defense allowing 34.4% (219th)
+124 spots
PRES turnovers
PRES offense 14.3% (114th) vs RAD defense allowing 14.6% (210th)
+96 spots

ContextHistory

last 10 days

RAD

CHSO

LONG

PRES

2 days rest

PRES

HPU

CHSO

RAD

2 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

RAD · last 10

17-13 · 2 days rest

Jan 22 vs LONGL 74–77
Jan 18 @ CHSOL 54–58
Jan 15 vs GWEBW 79–75
Jan 11 @ UPSTW 80–67
Jan 4 vs WINW 87–67
Jan 2 @ HPUL 58–76
Dec 22 @ SCL 48–74
Dec 17 @ CSUL 68–78
Dec 14 @ UTAHL 63–81
Dec 8 vs BUCKW 74–70

4-6 in these

PRES · last 10

11-18 · 2 days rest

Jan 22 vs CHSOW 71–61
Jan 18 @ HPUL 66–77
Jan 11 vs UNCAL 87–96
Jan 8 @ UPSTL 67–77
Jan 4 @ GWEBL 61–63
Jan 2 vs LONGW 68–60
Dec 30 @ SCL 59–69
Dec 21 vs MANL 81–86
Dec 15 @ MIAL 75–94
Dec 3 @ FAMUL 63–66

2-8 in these

Player props

No lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number

Radford Highlanders

Presbyterian Blue Hose

RAD rotation · last 15 games

Player	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast
Jarvis Moss	29.1	12.7	2.4	1.9
Brandon Maclin	27.1	8.5	4.9	2.0
Josiah Harris	23.3	8.6	8.1	0.3
Ibu Yamazaki	22.9	5.9	3.2	0.5
Truth Harris	21.5	8.6	2.4	1.5
Isaiah Gaines	21.2	5.2	5.2	1.1
David Early	14.2	6.1	1.3	0.8
TJ NeSmith	13.3	3.3	2.7	0.2

PRES rotation · last 15 games

Player	Min	Pts	Reb	Ast
Kobe Stewart	35.2	12.3	4.9	2.7
Kory Mincy	32.1	14.9	3.1	3.2
Jamahri Harvey	26.9	7.6	2.4	0.7
Jonah Pierce	25.8	13.3	8.3	1.5
Kaleb Scott	24.2	8.6	5.3	0.8
Jaylen Peterson	21.6	6.1	6.3	0.9
Carl Parrish	19.3	5.9	2.6	0.8
Iverson King	17.6	5.5	2.4	0.5

Team rankings (2024–25)History

RAD offenseper gamePRES defense

Effective FG%

168th50.8%

52.5%256th

Turnover %

203rd15.4%

15.5%141st

Offensive rebound %

53rd34.2%

31.3%260th

Free throw rate

10th31.1%

28.1%308th

Points

204th71.5

72.7190th

Field goal %

161st44.5%

46.5%294th

2-point %

240th49.7%

52.9%262nd

3-point %

95th35.3%

34.4%219th

Free throw %

54th75.9%

71.7%151st

Rebounds

189th34.4

34.2163rd

Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.

Scoring by halfHistory

per game, last 17 games · the tick is the league's average team

RADForAgainst

1st half

39.5

34.6

2nd half

40.9

44.3

Game

80.4

78.9

49% of RAD's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.

PRESForAgainst

1st half

33.0

36.1

2nd half

41.2

39.2

Game

74.2

75.2

44% of PRES's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.

Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.

SeriesHistory

10 meetings

RAD 7series3 PRES

Last 10PRRRPRPRRR

Avg total

146.7

combined points

Avg margin

RAD 7.1

per meeting

Biggest win

RAD +19

Jan 7, 2026

Last meeting

PRES won

Mar 6, 2026

Every meetingHistory

2026RAD 2-1 PRES

Date	Road	Home	Winner	Margin
Mar 6, 2026	PRES 91	RAD 85	PRES+6	+6
Jan 31, 2026	RAD 93	PRES 84	RAD+9	+9
Jan 7, 2026	PRES 61	RAD 80	RAD+19	+19

2025RAD 2-1 PRES

Date	Road	Home	Winner	Margin
Mar 7, 2025	PRES 69	RAD 74	RAD+5	+5
Feb 22, 2025	PRES 80	RAD 73	PRES+7	+7
Jan 25, 2025	RAD 82	PRES 69	RAD+13	+13

2024RAD 1-1 PRES

Date	Road	Home	Winner	Margin
Feb 10, 2024	RAD 73	PRES 76	PRES+3	+3
Jan 27, 2024	PRES 58	RAD 73	RAD+15	+15

2023RAD 1-0 PRES

Date	Road	Home	Winner	Margin
Feb 1, 2023	RAD 67	PRES 59	RAD+8	+8

2022RAD 1-0 PRES

Date	Road	Home	Winner	Margin
Dec 31, 2022	PRES 51	RAD 69	RAD+18	+18

Radford vs Presbyterian — College Basketball, Jan 25, 2025

Line scoreHistory

Top performersHistory

Box scoreHistory

Team statsHistory

Offense vs defense: the four factorsHistory