Loading the game…
⌘K
Purdue beat Nebraska 104–68 at home on Jan 12, 2025.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  NEB | 28 | 40 | 68 |
  PUR | 45 | 59 | 104 |
Nebraska CornhuskersPurdue Boilermakers| NEB | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juwan Gary | 29 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 4-10 | 0-5 |
| Brice Williams | 29 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 2-8 | 0-2 |
| Berke Buyuktuncel | 25 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3-5 | 2-4 |
| Rollie Worster | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2-4 | 0-2 |
| Braxton Meah | 15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Sam Hoiberg | 23 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 3-3 | 1-1 |
| Connor Essegian | 22 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 6-13 | 3-10 |
| Andrew Morgan | 17 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Ahron Ulis | 15 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-1 |
| Gavin Griffiths | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Cale Jacobsen | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Jeffrey Grace III | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 68 | 18 | 15 | 26-54 | 6-27 |
| PUR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith | 30 | 8 | 3 | 14 | 3-8 | 2-6 |
| Trey Kaufman-Renn | 27 | 15 | 6 | 7 | 7-9 | 0-0 |
| Fletcher Loyer | 24 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 7-12 | 5-6 |
| C.J. Cox | 23 | 23 | 4 | 2 | 9-11 | 5-7 |
| Caleb Furst | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Myles Colvin | 18 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 5-9 | 4-8 |
| Gicarri Harris | 15 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2-3 | 2-3 |
| Camden Heide | 14 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Raleigh Burgess | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Brian Waddell | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-1 |
| Will Berg | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Sam King | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Jace Rayl | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Jack Lusk | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 104 | 30 | 32 | 41-65 | 19-33 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
NEB offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · PUR defense in 2 (1 by a clear margin)
PUR offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · NEB defense in 2 (1 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
NEBPURExpected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
NEBPURNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Brice Williams's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brice Williams | 30.8 | 19.4 | 3.6 | 2.4 |
| Juwan Gary | 26.8 | 11.7 | 4.5 | 1.0 |
| Rollie Worster | 26.0 | 8.7 | 4.2 | 2.7 |
| Berke Buyuktuncel | 23.3 | 7.6 | 6.5 | 1.4 |
| Connor Essegian | 23.3 | 11.3 | 2.8 | 0.9 |
| Sam Hoiberg | 18.7 | 3.1 | 2.3 | 1.5 |
| Andrew Morgan | 17.4 | 8.1 | 4.9 | 0.7 |
| Braxton Meah | 15.9 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 0.8 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith | 35.9 | 15.7 | 4.5 | 8.5 |
| Fletcher Loyer | 31.1 | 13.5 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
| Trey Kaufman-Renn | 29.3 | 17.9 | 6.1 | 2.2 |
| Camden Heide | 21.7 | 5.8 | 3.7 | 0.5 |
| Myles Colvin | 20.1 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 0.7 |
| Gicarri Harris | 15.8 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 1.1 |
| Caleb Furst | 15.7 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 0.3 |
| C.J. Cox | 15.3 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 0.8 |
NEB offenseper gamePUR defenseRank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
NEBForAgainst48% of NEB's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
PURForAgainst49% of PUR's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
NEB 1series7 PUR| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | PUR 74 | NEB 58 | PUR+16 | +16 |
| Feb 10, 2026 | PUR 80 | NEB 77 | PUR+3 | +3 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2025 | NEB 68 | PUR 104 | PUR+36 | +36 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2024 | PUR 72 | NEB 88 | NEB+16 | +16 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2023 | NEB 55 | PUR 73 | PUR+18 | +18 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2022 | PUR 65 | NEB 62 | PUR+3 | +3 |
| Jan 14, 2022 | NEB 65 | PUR 92 | PUR+27 | +27 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2021 | PUR 75 | NEB 58 | PUR+17 | +17 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
