Loading the game…
⌘K
Purdue beat Rutgers 68–50 at Rutgers on Jan 9, 2025.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  PUR | 33 | 35 | 68 |
  RUTG | 24 | 26 | 50 |
Purdue BoilermakersRutgers Scarlet Knights| PUR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith | 39 | 16 | 3 | 14 | 6-10 | 1-4 |
| Fletcher Loyer | 36 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 6-14 | 1-6 |
| Caleb Furst | 32 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Trey Kaufman-Renn | 20 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 6-8 | 0-0 |
| C.J. Cox | 17 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2-5 | 1-4 |
| Camden Heide | 22 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3-8 | 0-4 |
| Gicarri Harris | 17 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1-4 | 1-3 |
| Myles Colvin | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Raleigh Burgess | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 68 | 32 | 18 | 28-56 | 4-24 |
| RUTG | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ace Bailey | 32 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 5-15 | 4-9 |
| Dylan Harper | 28 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2-9 | 0-3 |
| Lathan Sommerville | 21 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Jamichael Davis | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Jeremiah Williams | 14 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Tyson Acuff | 25 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2-7 | 2-5 |
| Emmanuel Ogbole | 19 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Jordan Derkack | 16 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-1 |
| Dylan Grant | 15 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3-3 | 1-1 |
| P.J. Hayes | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-3 | 0-3 |
| Totals | 50 | 35 | 11 | 17-52 | 7-23 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
PUR offense ranks better in 3 of 4 matchups (3 by a clear margin) · RUTG defense in 1
RUTG offense ranks better in 4 of 4 matchups · PUR defense in 0
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
PURRUTGExpected pace: about 68 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
PURRUTGNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Dylan Harper's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braden Smith | 35.7 | 15.4 | 4.8 | 8.6 |
| Fletcher Loyer | 30.7 | 14.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Trey Kaufman-Renn | 30.1 | 17.8 | 6.3 | 2.3 |
| Camden Heide | 20.9 | 5.4 | 3.7 | 0.5 |
| Myles Colvin | 20.5 | 6.1 | 3.2 | 0.7 |
| Gicarri Harris | 16.2 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| C.J. Cox | 14.9 | 5.5 | 2.3 | 0.8 |
| Caleb Furst | 13.7 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.3 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ace Bailey | 33.4 | 19.1 | 7.6 | 0.7 |
| Dylan Harper | 32.9 | 21.1 | 5.2 | 4.5 |
| Jeremiah Williams | 24.9 | 7.6 | 3.5 | 2.1 |
| Jordan Derkack | 23.3 | 7.3 | 4.1 | 2.5 |
| Lathan Sommerville | 19.4 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 0.6 |
| Jamichael Davis | 18.1 | 4.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 |
| Zach Martini | 16.4 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 0.4 |
| Emmanuel Ogbole | 13.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 0.1 |
PUR offenseper gameRUTG defenseRank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
PURForAgainst49% of PUR's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
RUTGForAgainst44% of RUTG's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
PUR 7series3 RUTG| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2025 | PUR 81 | RUTG 65 | PUR+16 | +16 |
| Mar 4, 2025 | RUTG 71 | PUR 100 | PUR+29 | +29 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | PUR 68 | RUTG 50 | PUR+18 | +18 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2024 | RUTG 68 | PUR 96 | PUR+28 | +28 |
| Jan 28, 2024 | PUR 68 | RUTG 60 | PUR+8 | +8 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2023 | RUTG 65 | PUR 70 | PUR+5 | +5 |
| Jan 2, 2023 | RUTG 65 | PUR 64 | RUTG+1 | +1 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2022 | RUTG 72 | PUR 84 | PUR+12 | +12 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2021 | PUR 68 | RUTG 70 | RUTG+2 | +2 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2020 | PUR 76 | RUTG 81 | RUTG+5 | +5 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
