Pittsburgh beat Stanford 83–68 at home on Jan 4, 2025.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | 38 | 68 | |
| 38 | 45 | 83 |
| STAN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaylen Blakes | 36 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 2-5 | 2-4 |
| Maxime Raynaud | 29 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 7-10 | 3-5 |
| Oziyah Sellers | 28 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-1 |
| Aidan Cammann | 20 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Ryan Agarwal | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0-6 | 0-4 |
| Chisom Okpara | 15 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 3-6 | 2-3 |
| Benny Gealer | 13 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0-4 | 0-3 |
| Evan Stinson | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Tallis Toure | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Anthony Batson Jr. | 10 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-3 |
| Jaylen Thompson | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Cameron Grant | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Totals | 68 | 17 | 15 | 18-51 | 9-28 |
| PITT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaland Lowe | 37 | 16 | 3 | 5 | 5-14 | 2-5 |
| Guillermo Diaz Graham | 33 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 5-8 | 2-5 |
| Ishmael Leggett | 32 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 9-13 | 0-4 |
| Cameron Corhen | 31 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 4-8 | 0-0 |
| Zack Austin | 21 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-2 |
| Jorge Diaz Graham | 15 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-2 |
| Brandin Cummings | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Papa Amadou Kante | 9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Amsal Delalic | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Marlon Barnes Jr. | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Amdy Ndiaye | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 83 | 31 | 12 | 31-55 | 7-19 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
STAN offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups · PITT defense in 2
PITT offense ranks better in 3 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · STAN defense in 1 (1 by a clear margin)
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
Expected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
No lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Maxime Raynaud's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxime Raynaud | 34.5 | 20.8 | 11.9 | 1.7 |
| Jaylen Blakes | 32.2 | 15.2 | 3.5 | 5.2 |
| Oziyah Sellers | 32.0 | 14.2 | 3.1 | 0.7 |
| Ryan Agarwal | 27.2 | 7.7 | 5.4 | 2.0 |
| Benny Gealer | 20.2 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Aidan Cammann | 20.2 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 1.3 |
| Chisom Okpara | 17.2 | 5.8 | 2.4 | 0.8 |
| Evan Stinson | 13.2 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaland Lowe | 34.4 | 17.5 | 4.8 | 6.2 |
| Ishmael Leggett | 33.7 | 17.5 | 6.1 | 2.7 |
| Cameron Corhen | 28.5 | 11.1 | 5.7 | 1.2 |
| Zack Austin | 27.8 | 9.8 | 3.8 | 0.3 |
| Guillermo Diaz Graham | 23.9 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 1.5 |
| Damian Dunn | 22.1 | 11.1 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Brandin Cummings | 18.0 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 0.9 |
| Amsal Delalic | 16.2 | 4.0 | 2.8 | 1.1 |
Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
46% of STAN's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
44% of PITT's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2026 | PITT+1 | +1 | ||
| Feb 25, 2026 | STAN+8 | +8 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2025 | PITT+15 | +15 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.