Northeastern vs Vermont — College Basketball, Nov 30, 2024

Vermont beat Northeastern 68–64 at home on Nov 30, 2024.

FinalSat, Nov 30

Northeastern Huskies

17-15 · 8-8 on the road

64

Vermont Catamounts

19-12 · 12-3 at home

68

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
NE	22	42	64
UVM	35	33	68

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Northeastern Huskies

• Rashad KingG

  27 pts · 7 reb · 3 stl
  11-20 FG

  0-2 3PT
• Youri FritzF

  9 pts · 10 reb · 3 ast
  2-2 FG
• Harold WoodsG

  8 pts · 3 reb
  4-13 FG

  0-2 3PT

Vermont Catamounts

• TJ HurleyG

  23 pts · 2 reb
  6-14 FG

  3-6 3PT
• Jace RoquemoreG

  13 pts · 5 reb · 2 ast
  4-5 FG

  2-3 3PT
• Ileri Ayo-FaleyeF

  10 pts · 7 reb · 2 ast · 7 blk
  3-5 FG

  1-2 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

NE	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Rashad King	40	27	7	0	3	1	3	11-20	0-2	5-6	—
Harold Woods	32	8	3	0	1	0	1	4-13	0-2	0-0	—
Masai Troutman	23	7	4	1	1	0	2	2-9	0-2	3-4	—
LA Pratt	20	2	1	0	1	0	0	1-6	0-3	0-0	—
Collin Metcalf	6	0	0	0	1	0	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Youri Fritz	27	9	10	3	1	1	0	2-2	0-0	5-9	—
Alexander Nwagha	17	4	1	0	3	0	0	2-2	0-0	0-0	—
Ryan Williams	17	4	3	2	1	0	0	1-10	1-6	1-1	—
Luca Soroa Schaller	10	3	1	1	2	0	1	1-2	0-0	1-2	—
Sam Thomson	8	0	0	0	1	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		64	30	7	15	2	8	24-64	1-15	15-22

UVM	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Jace Roquemore	34	13	5	2	0	0	2	4-5	2-3	3-4	—
TJ Hurley	33	23	2	0	1	1	5	6-14	3-6	8-9	—
Ileri Ayo-Faleye	33	10	7	2	0	7	3	3-5	1-2	3-4	—
Shamir Bogues	27	7	4	1	1	0	4	3-7	0-1	1-2	—
Noah Barnett	17	0	3	0	1	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Seth Joba	20	3	7	1	0	0	3	1-3	1-3	0-0	—
Sean Blake	18	9	1	1	1	0	1	4-7	0-2	1-3	—
Sam Alamutu	15	3	5	3	0	0	1	0-2	0-1	3-4	—
Gavin Perryman	3	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		68	35	10	4	8	19	21-43	7-18	19-26

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

NEUVM

37.5%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 24-64, home 21-43.

48.8%

6.7%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 1-15, home 7-18.

38.9%

68.2%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 15-22, home 19-26.

73.1%

33

Rebounds

39

14

Offensive rebounds

8

7

Assists

10

8

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

20

15

Steals

4

2

Blocks

8

42

Points in the paint

26

7

Fast-break points

3

21

Fouls?Fewer is better.

19

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 360 (#1 = best)

NE offensevsUVM defense

NE offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · UVM defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

51.1%

#156

48.8%

Stronger#83

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.1%

#264

14.0%

slight#262

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.4%

#130

25.8%

Stronger#23

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

19.3%

#329

19.7%

Stronger#48

UVM offensevsNE defense

UVM offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · NE defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

49.0%

#268

50.3%

Stronger#146

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.3%

#197

15.8%

Stronger#112

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

26.2%

#286

31.4%

slight#263

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

21.5%

#262

21.1%

Stronger#84

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

NEUVM

+0.7 163rdNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions187th −0.7

105.3 225thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions297th 101.8

104.7 103rdDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)70th 102.5

66.6 237thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)352nd 63.4

Expected pace: about 65 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

No pairing is lopsided: each unit meets one ranked within a few spots of it.

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

NE

FIU

FGCU

CSUB

UVM

5 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

UVM

DEL

FAIR

NE

5 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

NE · last 10

17-15 · 5 days rest

• Nov 24 vs CSUBL 60–68
• Nov 23 @ FGCUW 59–55
• Nov 22 @ FIUW 60–58
• Nov 16 vs CCSUW 80–62
• Nov 13 vs HARVW 78–56
• Nov 10 vs PRINL 76–79
• Nov 4 @ BUW 80–72
• Mar 9 @ STBK2023–24L 65–75
• Mar 2 @ DREX2023–24L 59–73
• Feb 29 @ DEL2023–24L 67–73

5-5 in these

UVM · last 10

19-12 · 5 days rest

• Nov 24 @ FAIRL 66–67
• Nov 23 vs DELW 75–71
• Nov 19 vs BUFW 78–67
• Nov 15 @ IONAL 59–62
• Nov 9 @ MRMKL 51–65
• Nov 6 @ AUBL 43–94
• Nov 4 @ UABW 67–62
• Mar 22 @ DUKE2023–24L 47–64
• Mar 16 vs UML2023–24W 66–61
• Mar 12 vs UNH2023–24W 66–59

5-5 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.