Wagner vs Georgetown — College Basketball, Nov 26, 2024

Georgetown beat Wagner 66–41 at home on Nov 26, 2024.

FinalTue, Nov 26

Wagner Seahawks

8-15 · 5-9 on the road

41

Georgetown Hoyas

16-15 · 13-6 at home

66

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
WAG	20	21	41
GTWN	28	38	66

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Wagner Seahawks

• Javier EzquerraG

  8 pts · 2 reb · 4 ast
  3-12 FG

  2-6 3PT
• Keyontae LewisF

  7 pts · 8 reb
  3-9 FG

  1-1 3PT
• Zaire WilliamsG

  7 pts · 2 reb · 2 ast
  2-6 FG

  2-5 3PT

Georgetown Hoyas

• Malik MackG

  16 pts · 3 reb · 2 ast
  4-10 FG

  2-3 3PT
• Micah PeavyNA

  15 pts · 3 reb · 3 ast · 5 stl
  4-9 FG

  3-5 3PT
• Jordan BurksF

  10 pts · 3 reb
  4-5 FG

Box score◷History

every player+

WAG	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Javier Ezquerra	38	8	2	4	2	0	4	3-12	2-6	0-0	—
Keyontae Lewis	29	7	8	0	1	1	3	3-9	1-1	0-0	—
Zaire Williams	23	7	2	2	0	0	0	2-6	2-5	1-2	—
Di'Andre Howell-South	23	3	5	2	1	0	1	1-6	1-2	0-0	—
Zavier Fitch	15	2	4	0	0	0	1	0-3	0-1	2-2	—
Tyje Kelton	25	3	2	0	0	0	0	1-6	1-4	0-0	—
R.J. Greene	20	7	4	0	0	1	6	2-5	0-0	3-4	—
Ja'Kair Sanchez	16	4	0	2	2	0	0	2-2	0-0	0-0	—
Churchill Bounds	11	0	3	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		41	30	10	6	2	15	14-50	7-19	6-8

GTWN	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Micah Peavy	34	15	3	3	5	1	3	4-9	3-5	4-7	—
Malik Mack	29	16	3	2	0	0	1	4-10	2-3	6-8	—
Jayden Epps	29	3	2	2	3	0	0	1-5	1-4	0-0	—
Thomas Sorber	28	9	7	6	2	3	2	4-6	1-2	0-0	—
Drew Fielder	23	8	4	2	1	0	0	4-4	0-0	0-0	—
Jordan Burks	15	10	3	0	1	0	2	4-5	0-0	2-2	—
Kayvaun Mulready	12	4	2	1	1	0	1	1-4	0-3	2-2	—
Julius Halaifonua	12	0	1	0	0	1	0	0-3	0-2	0-0	—
Curtis Williams Jr.	8	0	1	0	1	0	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Drew McKenna	4	0	1	0	0	1	0	0-2	0-2	0-0	—
Austin Montgomery	2	1	0	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	1-2	—
Caleb Williams	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Hashem Asadallah	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		66	28	16	14	6	10	22-51	7-22	15-21

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

WAGGTWN

28.0%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 14-50, home 22-51.

43.1%

36.8%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 7-19, home 7-22.

31.8%

75.0%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 6-8, home 15-21.

71.4%

31

Rebounds

36

11

Offensive rebounds

12

10

Assists

16

18

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

11

6

Steals

14

2

Blocks

6

12

Points in the paint

28

15

Fast-break points

11

17

Fouls?Fewer is better.

11

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 360 (#1 = best)

WAG offensevsGTWN defense

WAG offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · GTWN defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

43.4%

#359

49.4%

Stronger#105

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.7%

#295

17.0%

Stronger#63

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.6%

#124

28.6%

slight#115

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

20.7%

#291

22.3%

Stronger#112

GTWN offensevsWAG defense

GTWN offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups · WAG defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.5%

#196

50.6%

slight#160

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

15.0%

#177

16.1%

Stronger#100

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.5%

#129

25.0%

Stronger#14

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.1%

#342slight

30.3%

#343

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

WAGGTWN

−10.3 308thNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions117th +3.5

94.1 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions220th 105.5

104.4 99thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)62nd 102.0

60.2 359thPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)193rd 67.6

Expected pace: about 64 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  GTWN 2-point shooting

  GTWN offense 52.1% (131st) vs WAG defense allowing 51.4% (196th)
  +65 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

SMTWTFSSMGame

WAG

BU

GTWN

6 days rest5th straight road game

SMTWTFSSMGame

GTWN

MSM

WAG

5 days rest5th straight home game

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

WAG · last 10

8-15 · 6 days rest

• Nov 19 @ BUW 60–58
• Nov 16 @ HALLL 28–54
• Nov 13 @ SJUL 45–66
• Nov 6 @ RUTGL 52–75
• Mar 21 @ UNC2023–24L 62–90
• Mar 19 @ HOW2023–24W 71–68
• Mar 12 @ MRMK2023–24W 54–47
• Mar 9 @ CCSU2023–24W 66–56
• Mar 6 @ SHU2023–24W 60–57
• Mar 2 vs FDU2023–24L 54–57

5-5 in these

GTWN · last 10

16-15 · 5 days rest

• Nov 20 vs MSMW 79–51
• Nov 16 vs NDL 63–84
• Nov 9 vs FAIRW 69–57
• Nov 6 vs LEHW 85–77
• Mar 13 @ PROV2023–24L 56–74
• Mar 9 @ SJU2023–24L 78–86
• Mar 5 vs PROV2023–24L 58–71
• Mar 2 vs XAV2023–24L 93–98
• Feb 27 @ VILL2023–24L 47–75
• Feb 24 @ DEP2023–24W 77–76

4-6 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.