Loading the game…
⌘K
Boston College beat The Citadel 69–60 at home on Nov 4, 2024.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  CIT | 28 | 32 | 60 |
  BC | 37 | 32 | 69 |
The Citadel BulldogsBoston College Eagles| CIT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brody Fox | 32 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 6-10 | 0-1 |
| Sola Adebisi | 30 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 3-6 | 0-2 |
| Cameron Glover | 27 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 3-8 | 1-4 |
| Paxton Davidson | 24 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-6 |
| John Adams | 20 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Keynan Davis | 24 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 2-6 | 1-5 |
| Kam Roberts | 14 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-6 | 0-1 |
| Colby McAllister | 14 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-4 |
| Christian Moore | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Eze Wali | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Totals | 60 | 29 | 11 | 20-52 | 3-24 |
| BC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger McFarlane | 32 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 3-8 | 0-1 |
| Donald Hand Jr. | 31 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 4-14 | 3-8 |
| Chad Venning | 29 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 4-9 | 0-1 |
| Elijah Strong | 29 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 5-7 | 1-2 |
| Chas Kelley III | 19 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0-4 | 0-1 |
| Dion Brown | 18 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-5 | 1-3 |
| Joshua Beadle | 17 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2-5 | 0-1 |
| Jayden Hastings | 11 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Luka Toews | 11 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Fred Payne | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Totals | 69 | 39 | 10 | 21-54 | 5-18 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
CIT offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · BC defense in 4 (1 by a clear margin)
BC offense ranks better in 3 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · CIT defense in 1
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 360 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
CITBCExpected pace: about 67 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 360 teams, 1st = best.
No props posted for this game yet. Books usually post them the day of the game; see the full props board.
CIT offenseper gameBC defenseRank among 360 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
CITForAgainst47% of CIT's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
BCForAgainst46% of BC's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
CIT 0series3 BC| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | CIT 47 | BC 76 | BC+29 | +29 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2024 | CIT 60 | BC 69 | BC+9 | +9 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2023 | BC 75 | CIT 71 | BC+4 | +4 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
