Rhode Island vs Fordham — College Basketball, Mar 7, 2026

Fordham beat Rhode Island 61–49 at home on Mar 7, 2026.

FinalSat, Mar 7Conference game

Rhode Island Rams

16-16 · 6-9 on the road

49

Fordham Rams

14-15 · 10-8 at home

61

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
URI	28	21	49
FOR	25	36	61

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Rhode Island Rams

• Jahmere TrippF

  18 pts · 5 reb · 1 ast
  6-14 FG

  4-10 3PT
• Tyler CochranG

  12 pts · 8 reb · 2 ast · 4 stl
  5-15 FG

  2-8 3PT
• Jonah HintonG

  9 pts · 1 reb · 3 ast
  2-11 FG

  1-10 3PT

Fordham Rams

• Dejour ReavesG

  17 pts · 4 reb · 1 ast
  4-9 FG

  1-3 3PT
• Rikus SchulteF

  12 pts · 13 reb · 3 ast · Double-double
  5-9 FG

  0-1 3PT
• Abass BodijaF

  10 pts · 4 reb
  3-6 FG

Box score◷History

every player+

URI	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Tyler Cochran	37	12	8	2	4	0	2	5-15	2-8	0-2	—
Jahmere Tripp	33	18	5	1	1	0	5	6-14	4-10	2-3	—
Jonah Hinton	33	9	1	3	1	0	3	2-11	1-10	4-4	—
Keeyan Itejere	32	4	5	0	2	1	0	2-4	0-0	0-0	—
Myles Corey	19	2	2	2	1	1	1	1-2	0-0	0-0	—
RJ Johnson	26	4	2	4	0	0	2	2-2	0-0	0-0	—
Alex Crawford	12	0	0	0	1	0	2	0-4	0-3	0-0	—
Jalen Harper	4	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Drissa Traore	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Jimmy Ball	1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		49	24	12	10	2	15	18-53	7-32	6-9

FOR	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Dejour Reaves	36	17	4	1	1	0	3	4-9	1-3	8-8	—
Rikus Schulte	35	12	13	3	2	0	2	5-9	0-1	2-4	—
Akira Jacobs	21	7	6	2	0	0	1	2-4	1-3	2-2	—
Marcus Greene	6	3	0	1	1	0	0	1-5	1-4	0-0	—
Jameson O'Toole	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Christian Henry	31	6	5	5	2	0	2	2-8	1-4	1-3	—
Abass Bodija	28	10	4	0	0	0	2	3-6	0-0	4-4	—
Roor Akhuar	23	3	2	0	3	0	1	1-3	1-3	0-0	—
Louis Lesmond	17	3	3	1	0	0	3	1-2	1-2	0-0	—
Totals		61	37	13	9	0	14	19-46	6-20	17-21

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

URIFOR

34.0%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 18-53, home 19-46.

41.3%

21.9%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 7-32, home 6-20.

30.0%

66.7%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 6-9, home 17-21.

81.0%

26

Rebounds

40

7

Offensive rebounds

10

12

Assists

13

16

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

17

10

Steals

9

2

Blocks

0

14

Points in the paint

22

4

Fast-break points

6

20

Fouls?Fewer is better.

13

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

URI offensevsFOR defense

URI offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · FOR defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

50.1%

#228

49.9%

Stronger#95

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.7%

#315

15.2%

Stronger#129

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

31.0%

#159

26.8%

Stronger#29

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.7%

#101

20.7%

slight#44

FOR offensevsURI defense

FOR offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · URI defense in 3 (2 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

48.6%

#296

50.4%

Stronger#125

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

14.6%

#184

18.5%

Stronger#11

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

34.1%

#63Stronger

31.8%

#241

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.6%

#355

30.0%

slight#311

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

URIFOR

+2.6 132ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions143rd +1.9

106.2 245thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions265th 105.1

103.7 52ndDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)47th 103.3

65.8 293rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)342nd 64.2

Expected pace: about 65 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  FOR offensive rebounding

  FOR offense 34.1% (63rd) vs URI defense allowing 31.8% (241st)
  +178 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

URI

SBU

JOES

DUQ

FOR

2 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

FOR

VCU

LAS

URI

2 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

URI · last 10

16-16 · 2 days rest

• Mar 4 vs DUQW 64–52
• Feb 28 vs JOESL 55–61
• Feb 26 @ SBUL 76–94
• Feb 21 @ LASL 46–59
• Feb 17 vs SLUW 81–76
• Feb 14 vs FORL 66–70
• Feb 10 @ GWL 70–75
• Feb 7 vs RICHW 82–77
• Feb 1 @ DUQL 61–76
• Jan 27 @ DAYW 81–76

4-6 in these

FOR · last 10

14-15 · 2 days rest

• Mar 4 @ LASL 84–87
• Feb 28 @ VCUL 63–82
• Feb 21 vs DAVW 63–59
• Feb 18 vs LUCW 62–59
• Feb 14 @ URIW 70–66
• Feb 10 @ JOESW 68–64
• Feb 7 vs SBUL 67–70
• Feb 3 vs VCUL 59–63
• Jan 31 @ GWW 79–65
• Jan 28 vs LASW 64–58

6-4 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.