Stonehill vs Mercyhurst — College Basketball, Mar 7, 2026

Mercyhurst beat Stonehill 56–51 at home on Mar 7, 2026.

FinalSat, Mar 7Conference game

Stonehill Skyhawks

9-20 · 4-14 on the road

51

Mercyhurst Lakers

13-17 · 9-3 at home

56

RecapPropsStatsHead to head

Line score◷History

Team	1st	2nd	Final
STO	19	32	51
MERC	23	33	56

Top performersiEach team's three leading scorers in this game, with rebounds and assists. The full box score is below.◷History

Stonehill Skyhawks

• Davante HackettG

  21 pts · 5 reb
  6-16 FG

  2-7 3PT
• Chas StinsonG

  9 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
  2-8 FG

  0-2 3PT
• Ridvan TuticF

  7 pts · 8 reb
  3-5 FG

Mercyhurst Lakers

• Cameron JohnsonF

  17 pts · 5 reb
  7-11 FG

  3-4 3PT
• Bernie Blunt IIIG

  13 pts · 7 reb · 1 ast
  4-11 FG

  1-4 3PT
• Jake LemelmanG

  10 pts · 2 reb · 1 ast
  3-12 FG

  0-3 3PT

Box score◷History

every player+

STO	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Hermann Koffi	37	6	2	2	0	0	0	3-9	0-5	0-0	—
Rex Sunderland	36	4	4	1	4	0	1	2-4	0-1	0-2	—
Davante Hackett	27	21	5	0	1	2	3	6-16	2-7	7-8	—
Chas Stinson	26	9	3	1	2	1	0	2-8	0-2	5-9	—
Ethan Meuser	17	0	4	0	0	0	4	0-4	0-2	0-0	—
Ridvan Tutic	26	7	8	0	0	1	0	3-5	0-0	1-2	—
Raymond Espinal-Guzman	12	4	5	0	0	0	0	2-3	0-1	0-0	—
Anthony Holden	12	0	0	0	0	0	1	0-1	0-1	0-0	—
Trenton Ruth	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Pearse McGuinn	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		51	31	4	7	4	9	18-50	2-19	13-21

MERC	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Qadir Martin	31	8	9	3	1	3	1	3-7	1-2	1-2	—
Cameron Johnson	29	17	5	0	1	1	1	7-11	3-4	0-0	—
Bernie Blunt III	29	13	7	1	2	0	4	4-11	1-4	4-5	—
Jake Lemelman	28	10	2	1	0	0	0	3-12	0-3	4-4	—
Christian Gamble	18	0	3	1	1	0	0	0-3	0-3	0-0	—
Deshaun Jackson Jr.	27	6	4	2	1	0	1	2-8	0-0	2-2	—
Kaden Fuhrmann	19	2	0	3	0	0	0	1-3	0-2	0-0	—
Sean Lang	11	0	3	0	0	0	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	—
James Thomas	8	0	1	0	0	0	0	0-2	0-0	0-0	—
Totals		56	34	11	6	4	7	20-57	5-18	11-13

Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.

Team statsiTeam stats: green marks the better side; a longer bar is a bigger number, not always a better one.◷History

STOMERC

36.0%

Field goals?Made-attempted: away 18-50, home 20-57.

35.1%

10.5%

Three-pointers?Made-attempted: away 2-19, home 5-18.

27.8%

61.9%

Free throws?Made-attempted: away 13-21, home 11-13.

84.6%

34

Rebounds

40

3

Offensive rebounds

8

4

Assists

11

10

Turnovers?Fewer is better.

9

7

Steals

6

4

Blocks

4

32

Points in the paint

22

11

Fast-break points

8

17

Fouls?Fewer is better.

14

This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).

See the model’s call (graded) →

Going into the game · matchup numbers, form, rest+

Offense vs defense: the four factorsiEach offense's league rank against the defense it faces in shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws; longer = better.◷History

ranks betterranks worseStronger72+ places apartleague middleLonger bar = better rank of 361 (#1 = best)

STO offensevsMERC defense

STO offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · MERC defense in 4 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

46.0%

#347

49.6%

Stronger#81

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

16.9%

#326

16.4%

Stronger#62

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

27.3%

#282

30.2%

Stronger#168

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.2%

#357

29.6%

slight#301

MERC offensevsSTO defense

MERC offense ranks better in 1 of 4 matchups (1 by a clear margin) · STO defense in 3 (3 by a clear margin)

Shooting · effective FG%?Field-goal percentage with threes counted at 1.5; the defense's number is what it allows.

48.7%

#293

48.0%

Stronger#40

Turnovers · per 100 plays?Turnovers the offense commits (fewer is better) and the turnovers the defense forces.

12.7%

#38Stronger

11.8%

#343

Offensive rebounding %?Share of its own misses the offense rebounds; the defense's number is what it allows.

25.4%

#327

27.2%

Stronger#44

Free throw rate?Free throws made per field-goal attempt; the defense's number is what it allows.

18.0%

#358

20.4%

Stronger#37

Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.

Key numbers and mismatchesiHeadline ratings, then the biggest mismatches between one team's offense and the other's defense.◷History

STOMERC

−9.7 302ndNet rating?Points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions206th −1.9

94.2 355thOffensive rating?Points scored per 100 possessions303rd 103.0

103.9 59thDefensive rating?Points allowed per 100 possessions (rank 1 = allows least)73rd 104.9

66.9 243rdPace?Possessions per game (rank 1 = fastest)338th 64.5

Expected pace: about 66 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.

Where one side has the better of it

• 
  MERC turnovers

  MERC offense 12.7% (38th) vs STO defense allowing 11.8% (343rd)
  +305 spots

ContextiEach team's last ten days going into this game (filled = home, outline = road; travel distance is not tracked)◷History

last 10 days

TFSSMTWTFGame

STO

MERC

LEM

MERC

2 days rest

TFSSMTWTFGame

MERC

CCSU

STO

FDU

STO

2 days rest

homeroadday offthis gameFrom the schedule; travel distance is not tracked.

STO · last 10

9-20 · 2 days rest

• Mar 4 @ LEMW 81–71
• Feb 28 vs MERCL 72–75
• Feb 21 vs LEMW 77–68
• Feb 19 @ NHVNL 51–64
• Feb 14 vs WAGL 57–68
• Feb 12 @ CHSTL 55–68
• Feb 7 @ LIUL 54–61
• Feb 5 @ FDUL 58–74
• Jan 31 @ LEMW 65–54
• Jan 29 vs FDUW 58–57

4-6 in these

MERC · last 10

13-17 · 2 days rest

• Mar 4 vs FDUW 70–61
• Feb 28 @ STOW 75–72
• Feb 26 @ CCSUL 78–80
• Feb 21 vs LIUW 91–83
• Feb 19 vs WAGL 80–83
• Feb 12 @ LEML 57–58
• Feb 7 @ FDUL 52–55
• Jan 31 @ CHSTL 74–78
• Jan 29 vs NHVNW 70–51
• Jan 25 vs CHSTW 61–59

5-5 in these

From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.