Loading the game…
⌘K
East Tennessee State beat The Citadel 83–76 at a neutral site on Mar 7, 2026.
| Team | 1st | 2nd | Final |
|---|---|---|---|
  CIT | 32 | 44 | 76 |
  ETSU | 36 | 47 | 83 |
The Citadel BulldogsEast Tennessee State Buccaneers| CIT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braxton Williams | 38 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 7-14 | 3-8 |
| Sola Adebisi | 36 | 23 | 5 | 4 | 10-15 | 1-4 |
| Christian Moore | 31 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1-5 | 0-2 |
| Carter Kingsbury | 27 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 0-2 |
| Eze Wali | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-1 |
| Dante Kearse | 16 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 3-4 | 2-3 |
| Keynan Davis | 14 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3-8 | 2-5 |
| Marcos Gonzales | 7 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Logan Applegate | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Simeon German | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 76 | 27 | 16 | 29-58 | 8-26 |
| ETSU | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Taylor II | 35 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 5-12 | 1-5 |
| Jordan McCullum | 28 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 6-10 | 0-2 |
| Blake Barkley | 27 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 10-11 | 3-3 |
| Cam Morris III | 23 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Allen Strothers | 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1-1 | 1-1 |
| Maki Johnson | 29 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
| Jaylen Smith | 24 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 3-4 | 1-1 |
| Isaiah Sutherland | 10 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1-5 | 1-5 |
| Milton Matthews III | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Gabe Sisk | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Totals | 83 | 24 | 17 | 31-55 | 10-25 |
Starters first, then by minutes. +/- is the team's point margin while he was on the floor.
This game's box score totals; green marks the better side (fewer turnovers and fouls are better).
CIT offense ranks better in 0 of 4 matchups · ETSU defense in 4 (4 by a clear margin)
ETSU offense ranks better in 2 of 4 matchups (2 by a clear margin) · CIT defense in 2
Season box-score numbers; ranks of 361 teams. A defense ranks well for allowing less and forcing more turnovers.
CITETSUExpected pace: about 66 possessions a team (the two teams' average). Rank among 361 teams, 1st = best.
CITETSUNo lines posted yet: research the rotation against any number
Braxton Williams's full breakdown holds the game-by-game chart, hit-rate splits and filters, the what-if line and market curve, every book and the line history, closing lines, the projected range, teammates and matchup tools. Checking your player views…
Checking your player views…| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sola Adebisi | 35.7 | 11.1 | 5.9 | 1.3 |
| Braxton Williams | 33.1 | 17.1 | 3.7 | 2.1 |
| Carter Kingsbury | 31.4 | 7.9 | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| Eze Wali | 26.5 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 2.5 |
| Christian Moore | 25.7 | 12.2 | 3.3 | 0.8 |
| Logan Applegate | 18.1 | 7.1 | 2.3 | 1.3 |
| Marcos Gonzales | 13.3 | 3.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Dante Kearse | 9.8 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.6 |
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian Taylor II | 33.1 | 14.9 | 3.2 | 2.7 |
| Blake Barkley | 30.8 | 15.5 | 7.2 | 1.5 |
| Cam Morris III | 27.0 | 14.1 | 6.1 | 1.7 |
| Jaylen Smith | 23.7 | 7.3 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| Jordan McCullum | 22.7 | 8.3 | 3.2 | 0.9 |
| Allen Strothers | 22.7 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Maki Johnson | 22.4 | 5.7 | 3.3 | 0.8 |
| Gabe Sisk | 12.2 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 0.7 |
CIT offenseper gameETSU defenseRank among 361 teams, 1st = best; a longer bar is a better rank. A defense ranks well for allowing less: lower shooting percentages, fewer points and rebounds, more turnovers forced.
CITForAgainst47% of CIT's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
ETSUForAgainst46% of ETSU's points come in the first half, 47% for the average team.
Average points per game in each period, from box scores, over a team's last 17 games; overtime is pooled into the second half and the game. History, not a forecast: a team that leads late plays differently than one that trails, and a small window swings.
CIT 1series9 ETSU| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2026 | CIT 76 | ETSU 83 | ETSU+7 | +7 |
| Jan 23, 2026 | CIT 55 | ETSU 84 | ETSU+29 | +29 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2025 | ETSU 74 | CIT 49 | ETSU+25 | +25 |
| Mar 1, 2025 | ETSU 81 | CIT 66 | ETSU+15 | +15 |
| Jan 11, 2025 | CIT 52 | ETSU 70 | ETSU+18 | +18 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2024 | ETSU 81 | CIT 63 | ETSU+18 | +18 |
| Feb 3, 2024 | CIT 60 | ETSU 62 | ETSU+2 | +2 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2023 | CIT 70 | ETSU 78 | ETSU+8 | +8 |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ETSU 96 | CIT 74 | ETSU+22 | +22 |
| Date | Road | Home | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2022 | CIT 84 | ETSU 76 | CIT+8 | +8 |
From box scores. Ratings are per 100 possessions (possessions estimated from box scores). Prop lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM and Caesars; hit rates are past games against a number, not a forecast or a pick. For information only, not betting advice. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER.
